Open Innovations and Living Labs: Promises or Challenges to Regional Renewal

Ilari Karppi

doi:10.2478/v10105-012-0015-6

Authors

Ilari Karppi Regional Studies, School of Management, University of Tampere, FI-33014, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-012-0015-6

Keywords:

industrial renewal, spaces of innovation, new work

Abstract

The paper brings to the foreground modes and strategies of organising purposeful action that may be conductive to local and regional actors’ successful coping in the more and more competitive environment. The paper is pragmatist by its approach in a sense that it emphasises preconditions and possibilities for making ideas work. However, to do this is a difficult task. In the maze of multifaceted information flows and revolutionary technologies for reaching them enterprises and public actors need to find and construct better structured information that really helps them to operate. The paper introduces two sets of case activities that build on open innovation and living lab approaches in their attempts to make the boundaries between organisations and their environment more permeable. Its findings support the structuralist idea that spatial attributes matter more than as a mere venue, platform, or even container of social action. The venues studied in the paper are unique: one of the oldest still remaining factory buildings in the innermost core of the city of Tampere and a re-used loghouse in a peri-urban landscape outside the city. They both serve now as true exploratory spaces with no functional or institutional lock-ins stemming from them to bond their present-day users.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AHLAVA, A. and EDELMA N, H. (2008), Urban Design Management. A Guide to Good Practice (translated from Urban Design Management. Opas käytäntöön, 2007), London: Taylor and Francis.
Google Scholar

ANDERSEN, K. V., HANSEN, H. K., ISAKSEN, A. and RAUNIO, M. (2010), ‘Nordic City Regions in the Creative Class Debate – Putting the Creative Class Thesis to a T est’, Industry and Innovation, 17 (2), pp. 215–240.
Google Scholar

ARNKIL, R., JÄRVENSIVU, A., KOSKI, P. and PIIRAINEN, T. (2010), Exploring Quadruple Helix. Outlining User-oriented Innovation Models, Tampere: University of Tampere, Institute for Social Research, Work Research Centre.
Google Scholar

BURT, R. (1995), Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Second printing, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

CHESBROUGH, H. (2003), Open Innovation: New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar

CLARK, T. N. (2007), ‘Making Culture into Magic: How Can It Bring Tourists and Residents?’, International Review of Public Administration, 12 (1), pp. 13–25.
Google Scholar

CLARK, P. (2009), European Cities and Towns 400-2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

CONZEN, M. R. G. (2004), Thinking about Urban Form. Papers on Urban Morphology, 1932–1998, ed. by M. P. CONZEN, Bern: Peter Lang A.G.
Google Scholar

DREAM CITY (2011), http://thedreamcity.com/
Google Scholar

FEENBERG, A. (2010), Between Reason and Experience. Essays in Technology and Modernity, Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

FLANAGAN, O. (2009), The Really Hard Problem. Meaning in a Material World, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

FORSBERG, G., GRIMSRUD, G. M., JAKOBSEN, L., JANSDOTTER, M. and STUBBERUD, K. V. (2006), Gränsfall. Platsens betydelse för omställning och utveckling i en gränsregion. Border case. Place and the Restructuring and Development of a Border Region, Stockolm: Nordregio.
Google Scholar

FRIEDMAN, T. (2007), Litteä maailma. 2000-luvun lyhyt historia (translated from The World is Flat. A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century [updated and expanded], 2006), Helsinki: Otava.
Google Scholar

GALLIVAN, M. and SRITE, M. (2005), ‘Information Technology and Culture: Identifying Fragmentary and Holistic Perspectives on Culture’, Information and Organization, 15, pp. 295–338.
Google Scholar

HÄNNINENA., and LEINO, J. (2011), ‘Mistä jatkajia yrittäjien työlle?’ (Who to continue entrepreneurs’ work?), Suomen Asiakastieto, Majakka, 1, pp. 30–39.
Google Scholar

HEALEY, P. and THOMAS, H. (1991), ‘Knowledge, Skills and Their Validation: Knowing Why, As Well As Knowing What and How’, [in:] THOMAS, H. and HEALEY, P. (eds.), Dilemmas of Planning Practice, Aldershot: Avebury Technical, pp. 193–199.
Google Scholar

HUB Tampere (2011), http://hubtampere.wordpress.com/in-english/
Google Scholar

HUIZINGH, E. K. R. E. (2011), ‘Open Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives’, Technovation, 31, pp. 2–9.
Google Scholar

HYNYNEN, A. and KOLEHMAINEN, J. (2011), ‘Keskikokoinen metapolis? Näköaloja osaamisvetoiseen kehittämiseen Seinäjoella’ (Mid-size metapolis? Perspectives to Knowledgedriven Development in the City of Seinäjoki), University of Tampere Sente Working Papers, 32.
Google Scholar

JACQUES, R. (1996), Manufacturing the Employee. Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Centuries, London: Sage.
Google Scholar

JANIS, I. L. (1982), Groupthink. Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Second Edition, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar

KARPPI, I. (2012), ‘Towards Associative Meaningfulness. A Community Development Close-up. Forthcoming’, [in:] TODISCO, E., KULTALAHTI, J. and KULTALAHTI, O. (eds.), Dynamics of Globalisation: Methodological, Economic and Social Aspects, Rome: la Sapienza University.
Google Scholar

KARPPI, I. and PIHLAJAMAA, P. (2010), ‘Venues of Industrial Renewal’, [in:] RANTANEN, K. (ed.), Living Industrial Past, Museum Centre Vapriikki, Tampere Museums Publications 110, Finnish Labour Museum Werstas,1, Tampere, pp. 90–109.
Google Scholar

KARPPI, I. and TAKALA, A. (2007), ‘North-European Bio-locations: Different Paths to Success’, Structural Change in Europe [Cities and Regions Facing up to Change], 5, pp. 74–79.
Google Scholar

KARPPI, I. and TAKALA, A. (2008), ‘Overwhelmed by Globalization? Revival of a Small Town Central Business District and the Sense of Locality’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 15, pp. 99–54.
Google Scholar

KOSTIAINEN, J. (2002), Urban Economic Development Policy in the Network Society, Tampere: Tekniikan akateemisten liitto TEK.
Google Scholar

KULTALAHTI, O. (2001), ‘From Heavy Industries to a High-Tech Centre: Mobility of Educated Labour in Tampere’, Espace, Populations, Societes, 3, pp. 297–309.
Google Scholar

LANIER, J. (2011), You Are Not a Gadget. A Manifesto [with updated material], London: Penguin.
Google Scholar

LUUKKO, T. (2010), ‘Täydellinen tila synnyttää uutta’ (Perfect space regenerates), Rajapinta, 3. http:/rajapinta.tut.fi/text/artikkelit/2010/3/Taydellinen_tila_synnittaa_uutta
Google Scholar

NOOTEBOOM, B. (2001), Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

OLDS, K. and THRIFT, N. (2005), ‘Cultures on the Brink: Reengineering the Soul of Capitalism – on a G lobal Scale’, [in:] ONG, A. and COLLIER, S. (eds.), Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 270–290.
Google Scholar

PAAKKUNAINEN, K. (2007), Alkaisinko yrittäjäksi? Tutkimus nuorten yrittäjyyspoliittisista kirjoituksista ja asenteista (Becoming an entrepreneur? Youth’s essays and attitudes on entrepreneurial policy), Helsinki: Yksityisyrittäjäin säätiö, Kerhokeskus - koulutyön tuki ry & Nuorisotutkimusverkosto.
Google Scholar

PINKER, S. (2006), ‘The Biology of Fiction’, [in:] WELLS, R. H. and McFADDEN, J. (eds.), Human Nature. Fact and Fiction, London: Continuum, pp. 27–39.
Google Scholar

POLANYI, M. and PROSCH, H. (1977), Meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

RASILA, T. (2004), Venture-to-Capital. A New Framework for Growth Venturing and Professional Ownership, Tampere, Tampere University of Technology.
Google Scholar

REICH, R. B. (1992), The Work of Nations. Preparing Ourselves for the 21st Century Capitalism, New York: Vintage.
Google Scholar

REICH, R. B. (2001), The Future of Success, London: William Heinemann.
Google Scholar

SACK, R. D. (1997), Homo Geographicus. A Framework for Action, Awareness and Moral Concern, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

SENNETT, R. (2002), Työn uusi järjestys. Miten uusi kapitalismia kuluttaa ihmisen luonnetta, (translated from The Corrosion of Character, 1999), Tampere: Vastapaino.
Google Scholar

SENNETT, R. (2009), The Craftsman, London: Penguin.
Google Scholar

SMITH, S. J. (1993), ‘Social Landscapes: Continuity and Change’, [in:] JOHNSTON, R. J. (ed.), The Challenge for Geography. A Changing World: A Changing Discipline, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 54–75.
Google Scholar

SUUNTAAMO (2011), http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/livinglab/suuntaamo-tampere-central-region-living-lab
Google Scholar

SYLVERS, E. (2011), ‘Fiat Turns Its Back on Italian Employer Group’, International Herald Tribune, 4th October.
Google Scholar

VIRILIO, P. (2007), The Original Accident (translated from L’accident original, 2005), Cambridge: Polity.
Google Scholar

VIRTANEN, M. (1987), Tehtaasta studioon (From factory to studio), Helsinki: Hanki ja Jää.
Google Scholar

YLÄ-ANTTILA, K. (2010), Verkosto kaupunkirakenteen analyysin ja suunnittelun välineenä (Network as a tool for analysing and planning urban form), Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.
Google Scholar