Exploring Proximities in Coworking Spaces: Evidence from Italy


  • Ilaria Mariotti Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-6914
  • Mina Akhavan Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU)




coworking space, coworker, proximity measures, Italy


Since the mid-2000s, the rising phenomenon of coworking spaces (CSs) has provided a flexible and mainly affordable solution for freelancers, entrepreneurs, small firms and start-ups, which may had experienced the issues of isolation when working from home, to work in a shared workplace, interact, socialize and share knowledge. This article explores the phenomenon of CSs within the theoretical framework of proximity measures a là Boschma (2005) – cognitive, organisational, social and institutional – that underpin the aspects of innovation, interaction and knowledge exchange. Though some studies on CSs have indirectly studied the different aspects of proximity, only a few of them focused on the importance of proximity measures at the workspace. With the aim to fill the gap in the literature, an empirical study was applied to Italy with 549 active CSs in 2018. The data was collected through an on-line questionnaire, addressed to a sample of 326 coworkers, focusing mainly on the set of questions devoted to understanding whether coworkers have exploited the proximity typologies in their CSs, have experienced increases in their revenues and well-being. The results are critically discussed, and some insights on policy implications are proposed.


Download data is not yet available.


AKHAVAN, M. and MARIOTTI, I. (2018), ‘The Effects of Coworking Spaces on Local Communities in the ItalianContext’, Territorio 87, pp. 85–92. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2018-087014
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2018-087014

ALLEN, T.J., TOMLIN, B. and HAUPTMAN, O. (2008), ‘Combining organisational and physical location to manage knowledge dissemination’, International Journal of Technology Management, 44 (1/2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.020706
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.020706

AVDIKOS, V. and KALOGERESIS, A. (2017), ‘Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: evidence from the design sector in Greece’, Area, 49 (1), pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12279
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12279

AYDALOT, Ph. (1986), (ed.), Miliex innovateurs en Europe, Paris: GREMI.
Google Scholar

BALLAND, P.A. (2012), ‘Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry’, Regional Studies, 46 (6), pp. 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529121

BALLAND, P.-A., BOSCHMA, R. and FRENKEN, K. (2015), ‘Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics’, Regional Studies, 49 (6), pp. 907–920.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.883598

BECATTINI, G. (1990), ‘The Marshallian industrial district as socio-economic notion’, [in:] PYKE, F., BECATTINI, G., SENGENBERGER, W. (eds.), Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy, Geneve: International institute for Labour Studies.
Google Scholar

BILANDZIC, M. and FOTH, M. (2013), ‘Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning’, Library Hi Tech, 31 (2), pp. 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040

BLAGOEV, B., COSTAS, J. and KÄRREMAN, D. (2019), ‘«We are all herd animals»: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces’, Organization, 135050841882100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008

BOSCHMA, R. (2005), ‘Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment’, Regional Studies, 39 (1), pp. 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887

BOUNCKEN, R.B. and REUSCHL, A.J. (2018), ‘Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship’, Review of Managerial Science, 12 (1), pp. 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y

CAPDEVILA, I. (2013), Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2414121 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121 (2016/05/25)
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121

CAPELLO, R. (2007), Regional Economics, Routledge, London and New York.
Google Scholar

COHEN, D. and PRUSAK, L. (2001), In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1145/358974.358979
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358974.358979

COOKE, P. (2002), Knowledge Economies: clusters, learning and cooperative advantage, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203445402
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203445402

DAVIES, A. and TOLLERVEY, K. (2013), The Style of Coworking: Contemporary Shared Workspaces, Munich: Prestel Verlag.
Google Scholar

Di MARINO, M. and LAPINTIE, K. (2017), ‘Emerging Workplaces in Post-Functionalist Cities’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1297520
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1297520

DOLFSMA, W. and SOETE, L. (eds.) (2006), Understanding the Dynamics of a Knowledge Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845429898
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845429898

ETZIONI, A. (1994), The Spirit of Community: The reinvention of American society, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar

FONNER, K.L. and STACHE L.C. (2012), ‘All in a day’s work, at home: teleworkers’ management of micro role transitions and the work–home boundary’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 27 (3), pp. 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00290.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00290.x

GANDINI, A. (2015), ‘The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review’, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15 (1), pp. 193–205.
Google Scholar

GARRETT, L.E., SPREITZER, G.M. and BACEVICE, P.A. (2017), ‘Co-constructing a Sense of Community at Work: The Emergence of Community in Coworking Spaces’, Organization Studies, 38 (6), pp. 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354

GASPAR, J. and GLAESER, E.L. (1998), ‘Information technology and the future of cities’, Journal of Urban Economics, 43 (1), pp. 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2031
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2031

GERTLER, M.S. (2008), ‘Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context’, [in:] AMIN, A. and ROBERTS, J., (eds.) Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization, pp. 203–226, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545490.003.0009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545490.003.0009

GOLD, M. and MUSTAFA, M. (2013), ‘«Work always wins»: client colonisation, time management and the anxieties of connected freelancers’, New Technology, Work and Employment, 28 (3), pp. 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12017
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12017

HARDEMAN, S., FRENKEN, K., NOMALER, Ö. and TERWAL, A. (2012), ‘A proximity approach to territorial science systems’, EUROLIO Conference on ‘Geography of Innovation’, 24–26 January 2012, Saint-Etienne, France.
Google Scholar

HOWELL, T. and BINGHAM, C. (2019), Coworking spaces: working alone, together, Kenan Institute Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.kenaninstitute.unc.edu/index.php/publication/coworking-spaces-working-alone-together/
Google Scholar

JOHNS, T. and GRATTON, L. (2013), ‘The Third Wave of Virtual Work – Harvard Business Review’, Harvard Business Review, 5 (I), pp. 1–16.
Google Scholar

JOROFF, M.L. (2002), ‘Workplace mind shifts’, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 4 (3), pp. 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010210811886
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010210811886

KIM, J. and KAPLAN, R. (2004), ‘Physical and Psychological Factors in Sense of Community: New Urbanist Kentlands and Nearby Orchard Village’, Environment and Behaviour, 36 (3), pp. 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503260236

KWIATKOWSKI, A. and BUCZYNSKI, B. (2011), Coworking: How freelancers escape the coffee shop office, Fort Collins, Colorado, US: Cohere Coworking.
Google Scholar

MARIOTTI, I. and DI MATTEO, D. (2020), ‘Coworking in emergenza Covid-19: quali effetti per le aree periferiche?’, EyesReg, 10 (2): http://www.eyesreg.it/2020/coworking-in-emergenza-covid-19-quali-effetti-per-le-aree-periferiche/
Google Scholar

MARIOTTI, I., PACCHI, C. and Di VITA, S. (2017), ‘Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects’, Journal of Urban Technology, 24 (3), pp. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556

MARSHALL, A. (1925), Principles of Economics, 8th edition, London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

MERKEL, J. (2015), ‘Coworking in the city’, Ephemera | theory & politics in organisation, 15 (1), pp. 121–139.
Google Scholar

MORISET, B. (2014), ‘Building new places of the creative economy: The rise of coworking spaces’, 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 Utrecht University, Utrecht, 23–25 January 2014.
Google Scholar

MORISET, B. and MALECKI, E.J. (2009), ‘Organization versus space: The paradoxical geographies of the digital economy’, Geography Compass, 3 (1), pp. 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00203.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00203.x

MORRISON, A. (2018), ‘A typology of places in the knowledge economy: Towards the fourth place’, International symposium on new metropolitan perspectives, pp. 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_50
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_50

NEEF, D. (ed.) (1998), The Knowledge Economy, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Google Scholar

OLDENBURG, R. (1989), The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community, New York: Paragon House.
Google Scholar

PARRINO, L. (2015), ‘Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange’, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13 (3), pp. 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47

RAFFAELE, C. and CONNELL, J. (2016), ‘Telecommuting and Co-Working Communities: What Are the Implications for Individual and Organizational Flexibility?’, [in:] SUSHIL, CONNELL, J. and BURGESS, J. (eds.), Flexible Work Organizations, pp. 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2834-9_2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2834-9_2

ROBELSKI, S., KELLER, H., HARTH, V. and MACHE, S. (2019), ‘Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (13), 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132379
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132379

ROVAI, A.P. (2002), ‘Building Sense of Community at a Distance’, International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 3 (1), pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79

SALVADOR, E., MARIOTTI, I. and CONICELLA, F. (2013), ‘Science park or innovation cluster? Similarities and differences in physical and virtual firms’ agglomeration phenomena’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19 (6), pp. 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2012-0108
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2012-0108

SPINUZZI, C. (2012), ‘Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26 (4), pp. 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070

SPINUZZI, C., BODROŽIĆ, Z., SCARATTI, G. and IVALDI, S. (2019), ‘«Coworking Is About Community»: But What Is «Community» in Coworking?’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33 (2), pp. 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816357
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816357

TORRE, A. (2010), ‘Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des proximités’, Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine (3), pp. 409–438. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.103.0409
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.103.0409

TORRE, A. and GILLY, J.-P. (2000), ‘On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics’, Regional Studies, 34 (2), pp. 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050006087
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400050006087

WEBER, A. (1909/1929), Theory of the Location of Industries, trans. by FRIEDRICH, C.J. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar




How to Cite

Mariotti, I., & Akhavan, M. (2020). Exploring Proximities in Coworking Spaces: Evidence from Italy. European Spatial Research and Policy, 27(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.02