New Geographies of Work: Re-Scaling Micro-Worlds

Authors

  • Hans-Joachim Bürkner Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Flakenstr. 29–31, 15537 Erkner, Germany
  • Bastian Lange University of Leipzig, Institute of Geography, Johannisallee 19a, 04103 Leipzig, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-900X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.03

Keywords:

scale, flat ontology, new work, alternative workplaces, collaboration, social innovation

Abstract

The recently emerging new types of collaborative work and unconventional workplaces indicate that shifting social and economic practices have odd spatial implications. The diversity of work, mostly based on hybrid social and economic logics, has brought forth a number of new contextualised spatial constructs in recent years: makerspaces, fab labs, open workshops, and co-working spaces now require detailed analytical reconstruction and conceptualisation. This article is a theoretical discussion of the nature of fluid and contingent spatialisation against the backdrop of binary explanatory categories (e.g. local-global; proximity-distance). Drawing upon modernised concepts of horizontal scaling, we propose a perspective on hybrid work which focuses on contingent multiple, multidirectional and temporal scalings created by a variety of users while developing their own micro-worlds of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AVDIKOS, V. and KALOGERESIS, A. (2016), ‘Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: evidence from the design sector in Greece’, Area, 49 (1), pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12279
Google Scholar

BATHELT, H. and GLÜCKLER, J. (2003), ‘Toward a relational economic geography’, Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (2), pp. 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/3.2.117
Google Scholar

BRINKS, V. (2019), ‘«And Since I Knew About the Possibilities There …»: The Role of Open Creative Labs in User Innovation Processes’, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 110 (4), pp. 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12353
Google Scholar

BUDGE, K. (2019), ‘The ecosystem of a makerspace: Human, material and place-based interrelationships’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 5 (1), pp. 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.5.1.77_1
Google Scholar

BÜRKNER, H.-J. and LANGE, B. (2016), Configurations of Value Creation in Open Workshops, [in:] WULFSBERG, J.P., REDLICH, T. and MORITZ, M. (eds.), 1. interdisziplinäre Konferenz zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung, Hamburg: Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, pp. 307–316.
Google Scholar

CASTELLS, M. (2000), The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Google Scholar

CASTELLS, M. (2010), ‘Globalisation, Networking, Urbanisation: Reflections on the Spatial Dynamics of the Information Age’, Urban Studies, 47 (13), pp. 2737–2745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010377365
Google Scholar

CHATTERTON, P. and PUSEY, A. (2019), ‘Beyond capitalist enclosure, commodification and alienation: Postcapitalist praxis as commons, social production and useful doing’, Progress in Human Geography, 44 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518821173
Google Scholar

DEMARIA, F., KALLIS, G. and BAKKER, K. (2019), ‘Geographies of degrowth: Nowtopias, resurgences and the decolonization of imaginaries and places, ENE: Nature and Space, 2 (3), pp. 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619869689
Google Scholar

DURANTE, G. and TURVANI, M. (2018), ‘Coworking, the Sharing Economy, and the City: Which Role for the ‘Coworking Entrepreneur’?’, Urban Science, 2 (3), pp. 1–21, https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/2/3/83 https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030083
Google Scholar

FABBRI, J. and CHARUE-DUBOC, F. (2013), ‘The Role of Physical Space in Collaborative Workplaces Hosting Entrepreneurs’, [in:] VAUJANY, F.-X. and MITEV, N. (eds.), Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Springer, pp. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304094.0015
Google Scholar

FARIAS, I. (2010), ‘Introduction: decentring the object of urban studies’, [in:] FARIAS, I. and BENDER, T. (eds.), Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–24.
Google Scholar

FAULCONBRIDGE, J.R. (2006), ‘Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms’, Journal of Economic Geography, 6 (4), pp. 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi023
Google Scholar

FLORIDA, R. (2005), Cities and the creative class, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203997673
Google Scholar

GIBSON-GRAHAM, J.K. (2008), ‘Diverse economies: performative practices for ‘other worlds’’, Progress in Human Geography 32 (5), pp. 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821
Google Scholar

GIBSON-GRAHAM, J.K., CAMERON, J. and HEALY, S. (2013), Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming Our Communities, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676064.001.0001
Google Scholar

GRABHER, G. and IBERT, O. (2018), ‘Schumpeterian Customers? How Active Users Co-create Innovations’, [in:] CLARK, G.L., FELDMAN, M.P., GERTLER, M.S. and WÓJCIK, D. (eds.), The New Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755609.013.36
Google Scholar

GRAHAM, M., HJORTH, I. and LEHDONVIRTA, V. (2017), ‘Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (2), pp. 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Google Scholar

GRANOVETTER, M. (1985), ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), pp. 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Google Scholar

HARVEY, D. (1989), The Condition of Modernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

HEROD, A. and WRIGHT, M.W. (2002), ‘Placing Scale: An Introduction’, [in:] HEROD, A. and WRIGHT, M.W. (eds.), Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773406.ch
Google Scholar

HIELSCHER, S. and SMITH, A. (2014), ‘Community-based digital fabrication workshops: A review of the research literature’, Falmer: University of Sussex, SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2014-08. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742121
Google Scholar

HOLLOWAY, J. (2010), Crack Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.
Google Scholar

HUBER, F. (2012a), ‘On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity: Personal Knowledge Relationships of R&D Workers in the Cambridge Information Technology Cluster’, Regional Studies, 46 (9), pp. 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
Google Scholar

HUBER, F. (2012b), ‘On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity: Personal Knowledge Relationships of R&D Workers in the Cambridge Information Technology Cluster’, Regional Studies, 46 (9), pp. 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.569539
Google Scholar

KLEIBRINK, A. and SCHMIDT, S. (2015), ‘Communities of Practice as New Actors: Innovation Labs Inside and Outside Government’, [in:] European Commission (ed.), Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2015, Luxemburg: Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union, pp. 64–73.
Google Scholar

KRUEGER, R., SCHULZ, C. and GIBBS, D. (2018), ‘Institutionalizing alternative economic spaces? An interpretivist perspective on diverse economies’, Progress in Human Geography, 42 (4), pp. 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517694530
Google Scholar

LANGE, B. (2011), ‘Accessing Markets in Creative Industries: Professionalisation and social-spatial strategies of Culturepreneurs in Berlin’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23 (3), pp. 259–279.
Google Scholar

LANGE, B. and BÜRKNER, H.-J. (2018), ‘Open workshops as sites of innovative socio-economic practices: approaching urban post-growth by assemblage theory’, Local Environment, 23 (7), pp. 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1418305
Google Scholar

LEITNER, H. and MILLER, B. (2007), ‘Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 32, pp. 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00236.x
Google Scholar

LIEDTKE, C., BAEDEKER, C., HASSELKUß, M., ROHN, H. and GRINEWITSCHUS, V. (2015), ‘User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: an experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, pp. 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.070
Google Scholar

MACK, E. and MAYER, H. (2016), ‘The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Urban Studies, 53 (10), pp. 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547
Google Scholar

MACKINNON, D. (2011), ‘Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics’, Progress in Human Geography, 35 (1), pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510367841
Google Scholar

MARSTON, S.A. (2000), ‘The social construction of scale’, Progress in Geography 24 (2), pp. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200674086272
Google Scholar

MARSTON, S.A., JONES III, J.P. and WOODWARD, K. (2005), ‘Human geography without scale’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 30, pp. 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
Google Scholar

MARTIN, R., BERNDT, C., KLAGGE, B. and SUNLEY, P. (2005), ‘Spatial proximity effects and regional equity gaps in the venture capital market: Evidence from Germany and the United Kingdom’, Environment and Planning, 37 (7), pp. 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3714
Google Scholar

McKEEVER, E., ANDERSON, A. and JACK, S. (2014), ‘Social embeddedness in entrepreneurship research: the importance of context and community’, [in:] CHELL, E. and KARATAŞ-ÖZKAN, M. (eds.), Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 222–236. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809245.00022
Google Scholar

McROBBIE, A. (2015), Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries, London: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

MOORE, A. (2008), ‘Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice’, Progress in Human Geography, 32 (2), pp. 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507087647
Google Scholar

MORISET, B. (2013), Building new places of the creative economy: The rise of coworking spaces, Utrecht: Utrecht University, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00914075
Google Scholar

PORTER, M.E. (1998), ‘Clusters and the new economics of competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76 (6), pp. 77–90.
Google Scholar

PRATT, A.C. (2013), ‘Space and Place’, [in:] TOWSE, R. and HANDKE, C. (eds.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004876.00013
Google Scholar

QUAN-HAASE, A. and MARTIN, K. (2013), ‘Digital curation and the networked audience of urban events: Expanding La Fiesta de Santo Toma ́s from the physical to the virtual environment’, International Communication Gazette, 75 (1), pp. 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513491910
Google Scholar

RECKWITZ, A. (2006), Das hybride Subjekt: eine Theorie der Subjektkulturen von der bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne, Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Google Scholar

SCHMID, B. (2019a), ‘Degrowth and postcapitalism: Transformative geographies beyond accumulation and growth’, Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12470
Google Scholar

SCHMID, B. (2019b), ‘Repair’s diverse transformative geographies: lessons from a maker community in Stuttgart’, Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 19 (2), pp. 229–251.
Google Scholar

SCHNEIDER, C. and LÖSCH, A. (2019), ‘Visions in assemblages: Future-making and governance in FabLabs’, Futures, 109, pp. 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.08.003
Google Scholar

SMITH, A. (2017), ‘Social Innovation, Democracy and Makerspaces’, Falmer: University of Sussex’, SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2017-10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2986245
Google Scholar

SMITH, N. (2002), ‘Scale Bending and the Fate of the National’, [in:] SHEPPARD, E.S. and MCMASTER, R.B. (eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999141.ch10
Google Scholar

SOUKUP, C. (2006), ‘Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web’, New Media & Society, 8 (3), pp. 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061953
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Bürkner, H.-J., & Lange, B. (2020). New Geographies of Work: Re-Scaling Micro-Worlds. European Spatial Research and Policy, 27(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.03