Knowledge for spatial policy: the role of strategic research

Johan WISSERHOF

doi:10.18778/1231-1952.5.1.02

Authors

Johan WISSERHOF Catholic University of Nijmegen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.5.1.02

Keywords:

spatial policy, strategie research

Abstract

The direct contribution of research to the preparat i on of spatial poilicy in the Netherlands is relatively small. The policy-making processes rely heavily on the utilisation of 'in-stock' knowledge. The knowledge stock, however, has been built up partly by strategie research. Strategie research, therefore, is an indirect source of knowledge for spatial policy. Strategie research is defined as systematic investigation to acquire knowledge that may contribute to the solution of medium- or long-term societal problems.
In this paper, the question is posed how strategic research can be conducted in such a way that it contributes to the knowledge stock for spatial policy. The answer is sought in a multiperspective, interdisciplinary and actor-oriented researeh approach. Such an approach in a way complies with the multiple perspectives of policy-makers on societal problems: Technical, Organisational and Personal/Political (T+O+P). The information needs of policy-makers are not only problem-oriented (the T perspeetive) but also actor-oriented (the O and P perspectives).
A conceptual framework for strategic research is presented which includes multiple perspectives on spatial developments. Five perspectives for spatial research are distinguished: the social construction of spatial developments, the institutionalisation of interests, regional restructuring, societal steering by policy-makers, and the performance of policy. Each of these perspectives involves interdisciplinary and actor-oriented research. The conceptual framework is briefly exemplified by applications in the study of rural regions. Finally, the actual contribution of the conceptual framework to the knowledge stock for spatial policy is discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLISON, G. T. (1971), Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban missile crisis, Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Google Scholar

ARTS, G. J. M. (1991), Kennis en ruimtelijk beleid: Naar kennismanagement in de ruimtelijke ordening [Knowledge and spatial policy], Zeist: Kerckebosch.
Google Scholar

ARTS, G. J. M. and ALPHEN, H. J. M. van (eds) (1996), Omgaan met kennis in de ruimtelijke ordening, Den Haag: Netwerk RO.
Google Scholar

GALLE, M. M. A. (1988), Constructie van de beleidstheorie van direct nut voor de beleidspraktijk? "Beleid en maatschappij'', 15(1): 45-54.
Google Scholar

GELDOF, G. D. (1992), Beleidsanalyse in de studie Hoenwaard, [in:] WENTHOLT, L. R. (ed.), Beleidsanalyse in het waterbeheer, Klvl, STOWA.
Google Scholar

GOVERDE, H. J. M., Wisserhof, J., Dijkstra, E. K. and Tilmans, R. A. M. (1997), Bestuurlijke evaluatie Strategische Groenprojecten Natuurontwikkeling, Wageningen: IBN-DLO, rapport 269.
Google Scholar

HAGERSTRAND, T. (1991), The problem of utilising scientific (natural science) understanding in societal planning and decision-making, [in:] JOHANSSON, I. (ed.), Water awareness in societal planning and decision-making, Stockholm: Swedish Council for Building Research.
Google Scholar

HARVEY, D. (1989), The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change, Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

HEIDE, H. ter (1992a), Strategisch onderzoek voor strategische planning: functies van kennis in het ruimtelijk beleid, Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit, Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen.
Google Scholar

HEIDE, H. ter (1992b), Knowledge management in strategic planning: the case of the Dutch Fourth Report, "Knowledge and Policy", 5(2): 29-44.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692804

HEIDE, H. ter, COOLSMA, C. and KRAGT, R. H. (1980), Toward strategies for improving the relation between research and policy, the Hague: National Physical Planning Agency, Publication 80-2.
Google Scholar

HOEKVELD, G. A. (1971), De geografische beschouwingswijze, [in:] BRUIJNE, G. A. de, HOEKVELD, G. A. and SCHAT, P. A. (eds), Op zoek naar een geografisch wereldbeeld, Roermond: Romen: 11-35.
Google Scholar

HORREVOETS, M. S. G. and HEIDE, H. ter (1992), Kenniseconomie: aanzetten tot doelmatigheidsvergroting in de ruimtelijke kennishuishouding, Den Haag: PRO-voorstudie 32.
Google Scholar

KIEVJT, J. de (1993), Handelen en ruimte: interactie tussen overheidsmaatregelen en maatschappelijk proces [Actions which shape the built environment], Amsterdam: Thesis.
Google Scholar

LINSTONE, H. A. (ed.), (1984), Multiple perspectives for decision making: bridging the gap between analysis and action, New York: North-Holland.
Google Scholar

LOHUIZEN, C. W. W. van (1986), Knowledge management and policy-making, "Knowledge", 8(1): 12-38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708600800102

LOHUIZEN, C. W. W. van and DAAMEN, J. C. (1976), Onderzoeken ruimtelijkbeleid, Delft: Planologisch Studiecentrum TNO.
Google Scholar

MARSDEN, T. (1996), Rural geography trend report: the social and political bases of rural restructuring, "Progress in Human Geography", 20(2): 246-258.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000209

MARSDEN, T., MURDOCH, J., LOWE, P., MUNTON R. and FLYNN A. (1993), Constructing the countryside. Restructuring rural areas, 1, London: UCL Press.
Google Scholar

MURDOCH, J. and MARSDEN, T. (1994), Reconstituting rurality: class, community and power in the development process. Restructuring rural areas, 2, London: UCL Press.
Google Scholar

PUTT, A. D. and SPRINGER, J. F. (1989), Policy research: concepts, methods, and applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar

VELDMAN, J. (1982), Proposal for a theoretical basis for the human geography of rural areas, [in:] CLARK, G., GROENENDIJK, J. and THISSEN, F. (eds), The changing countryside, s. I.; s.n.: 17-26.
Google Scholar

WERLEN, B. (1993), Society, action and space: an alternative human geography, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar