Flexible manufacturing network creation. An alternative strategy to combat increased competition in the Single Market?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.4.2.02Keywords:
geography of manufacturing, industrial policyAbstract
In the recent years there has been (a) an increase in competition due to the creation of the Single Market, (b) a need for components instead of single sub-assemblies and (c) a dramatic economic success in the Third ltaly. All three events have made the creation of flexible manufacturing networks an interesting altemative to improve competitiveness among small- and medium-sized companies in areas where such networks do not exist yet. This article looks at what is already known about the creation of flexible manufacturing networks. Besides some common aspects, like determinants, life-cycles, support organisations and network brokers, it gives a description of three empirical models. These are the industrial districts or Third Italy model, the Danish model and the Appalachian Center for Economic Networks model. Their functioning and pros and cons are explained to help areas willing to run a network creation scheme.
Downloads
References
AMIN, A. and THOMAS, D. (1996), The negotiated economy: state and civic institutions in Denmark, "Economy and Society", 25: 255-281.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000012
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), (1995), Facilitating the formation of flexible manufacturing networks in rural, Southeastern Ohio, five Year Report, Athens: ACENet.
Google Scholar
BENNETI, R. J. and McCOSHAN, A. (1993), Enterprise and human resource development: local capacity building, London: Paul Chapman.
Google Scholar
BIRLEY, S., CROMIE, S. and MYERS, A. (1991), Entrepreneurial networks: their emergence in Ireland and overseas, "International Small Business Journal", 9: 56-74.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026624269100900404
BAGNASCO, (1977), Tre ltalie: la problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Bolonga: II, Mulino.
Google Scholar
BONADUCE, A. and MILLER, L. M. (1996), What makes co-operation happen? A look at interfirm relationships in the clusters of Emilia Romagna, "Firm Connections", 4: 10-12.
Google Scholar
BOSWORTH, B. and ROSENFELD, S. (1992), Significant others: exploring the potential of manufacturing networks, Regional Technology Strategies, Chapel Hill.
Google Scholar
BUTLER, J. E. and HANSEN, G. S. (1991), Network evolution, entrepreneurial success and regional development, "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development", 3: 1-16.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629100000001
CHASTON, I. (1996), Critical events and process gaps in the Danish Technological lnstitute SME Structural Networking Model, "International Small Business Journal", 14: 71-84.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242696143004
Commission of European Communities (CEC), (1996), Good practice in technology transfer. How to run transnational networks of innovation support organisations, CEC, DG 13/D, Luxembourg.
Google Scholar
FELSENSTEIN, D. (1992), The spatial linkage patterns of lsraeli firms: implications for regional industrial development, "Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geografie", 83: 105-119.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1992.tb01760.x
GARMISE, S. O. (1995), Economic development strategies in Emilia-Romagna, [in:] RHODES, M. (ed.), The regions and the new Europe: patterns in core and periphery development, European Policy Research Unit Series, Manchester: Manchester University Press: 136-164.
Google Scholar
GREENWOOD, R. (1992), Trade liberalization and the creation of regional production systems in peripheral localities: threats and opportunities for Newfoundland, lnstitute of Island Studies, Prince Edward Island.
Google Scholar
HARRISON, B.(1992), lndustrial districts: old wine in new bottles? "Regional Studies", 26: 469-483.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409212331347121
JACOBSON, O. and ANDRÉOSSO-O'CALLAGHAN, B. (1996), lndustrial economics and organization: a European perspective, London: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
JENSEN-BUTLER, C. (1992), Rural industrialisation in Denmark and the role of public policy, "Urban Studies", 29: 881-904.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080861
JOHANNISSON, B., ALEXANDERSON, O., NOWICKI, K. and SENNESETH, K. (1994), Beyond anarchy and organization: entrepreneurs in contextual networks, "Entrepreneurship and Regional Development", 6: 329-356.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629400000020
KAMANN, F. D-J. (1991), The distribution of dominance in networks and its spatial implication, [in:] BERGMAN, E., MAIER, G. and TEDTLING, F. (ed.), Regions reconsidered: economic networks, innovation, and local development in industrialized countries, London: Mansell: 35-57.
Google Scholar
LISTON, C. (1996), Worldwide connections: a status report on interfirm collaboration programmes, "Firm Connections", 4: 1, 6-7.
Google Scholar
MARSHALL, A. (1920), Principles of economics, 8th ed., London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
MIDMORE, P., RAY, C. and TREGEAR, A. (1995), The South Pembrokeshire LEADER project: an evaluation, Aberystwyth: University of Wales, Department of Agricultural Sciences.
Google Scholar
RATNER, S. (1995), Flexible manufacturing networks in the wood products industry: a background paper, St. Albans: Yellow Wood Association.
Google Scholar
RATNER, S. (1995), Flexible manufacturing networks in the wood products industry: a background paper, St. Albans: Yellow Wood Association.
Google Scholar
ROSENFELD, S. (1996), Neither bird nor plane: but is it a cluster or a network? "Finn Connections", 4: 2, 8.
Google Scholar
ROSENFELD, S. A. (1990), Technology, innovation and rural development: lessons from ltaly and Denmark, Washington: The Aspen Institute, Rural Economic Policy Programme.
Google Scholar
SCHAEFER, N. V. and ROY, J. A. (1993), The power of clusters and business networks can make your business competitive in world markets: synopsis of conference, University of New Brunswick, Centre for International Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Fredericton.
Google Scholar
SCHMITZ, H. and MUSYCK, B. (1994), lndustrial districts in Europe: policy lessons for developing countries? "World Development", 22: 889-910.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90060-4
SZARKA, J. (1990), Networking and small firms, "International Small Business Journal", 8: 10-22.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026624269000800201
TAYLOR, M. J. (1975), Organisational growth, spatial interaction and locational decisionmaking, "Regional Studies", 9: 313-323.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237500185361
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), (1994), The transformation of policy in the new world economy: networks and collaborative policy design, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/polrec.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), A market driven approach to flexible manufacturing networks, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/markfmn.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), Creating flexible manufacturing networks in North America: the co-evolution of technology and industrial organization, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/fmncrea.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), Creating high performance communities through the development of learning consortia, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/learncon.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), Network theory and practice, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/nettheory.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), Networked approach to improving business assistance policy in small, rural communities, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/busassist.html.
Google Scholar
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks (ACENet), Revitalizing regional economies by providing a telecommunications infrastructure which supports small manufacturing firms, Athens: Ohio, http://www.seorf.ohiou.edu/~xx001/hide/PAPERS/smallman.html.
Google Scholar
Commission of European Communities (CEC): Definition of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), Luxembourg: CEC, DG 23, http://www.cec.lu/en/comm/dg23/guide_en/definit.htm.
Google Scholar
HATCH, C. R. (1995a), The network brokers handbook: at a glance. Gaithersburg: Manufacturing Extension Partnership, http://www.mep.nist.gov/centers/resources/tools/networks/glance.html.
Google Scholar
HATCH, C. R. (1995b), The network brokers handbook: section one, Gaithersburg: Manufacturing Extension Partnership, http://www.mep.nist.gov/centers/resources/tools/networks/section1.html.
Google Scholar
HUGHES, G., Business support programme for Welsh speakers in Wales, Cardiff: University of Wales, Centre for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, http://infopole1.soca.cf.ac.uk:80/bn/bn.html.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.