Dialogue with the community in the planning process. How to use the participatory approach as a planning tool for the community’s benefit?

Authors

  • Aseem Deuskar Polytechnic University of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Turin, Italy image/svg+xml
  • Ketevan Khozrevanidze Mersin University, Çiftlikköy, Mersin Ünv., 33110 Yenişehir/Mersin, Turkey image/svg+xml
  • Zeynep Ozeren Polytechnic University of Turin, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Turin, Italy image/svg+xml
  • Iga Paradowska University of Łódź, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kopcińskiego 31, 90-142 Łódź, Poland image/svg+xml

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRYSON, J. (2004), ‘What to do when Stakeholders matter’, Public Management Review, 6 (1), pp. 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
Google Scholar

CARDI (2012), 10 guidelines for writing policy recommendations, Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland.
Google Scholar

CROWE, S., CRESSWELL, K., ROBERTSON, A., HUBY, G., AVERY, A., and SHEIKH, A. (2011), ‘The case study approach’, BMC medical research methodology, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Google Scholar

EDEN, G., SHARMA, S., ROY, D., JOSHI, A., NOCERA, J. A. and RANGASWAMY, N. (2019), ‘Field trip as method: a rapid fieldwork approach’, [in] Proceedings of the 10th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364183.3364188
Google Scholar

ERDIAW-KWASIE, M. O., and BASSON, M. (2018), ‘Reimaging socio-spatial planning: Towards a synthesis between sense of place and social sustainability approaches’, Planning Theory, 17 (4), pp. 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1473095217736793
Google Scholar

GUREL, E., and TAT, M. (2017), ‘SWOT Analysis: A Theoretical Review’, The Journal of International Social Research, 10 (51), pp. 994–1006. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
Google Scholar

JACKSON, G. and MORPETH, N. (1999), ‘Local Agenda 21 and Community Participation in Tourism Policy and Planning: Future or Fallacy’, Current Issues in Tourism, 2 (1), pp. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683509908667841
Google Scholar

PRETO, I., MCCALL, M. K., FREITAS, M. and DOURADO, L. (2016), ‘Participatory Mapping of the Geography of Risk: Risk Perceptions of Children and Adolescents in Two Portuguese Towns’, Children, Youth and Environments, 26 (1), pp. 85–110. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.26.1.0085
Google Scholar

WESTON, J. and WESTON, M. (2013), ‘Inclusion and Transparency in Planning Decision-Making: Planning Officer Reports to the Planning Committee’, Planning Practice & Research, 28 (2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.704736
Google Scholar

JORGE, J. P., OLIVEIRA, V., SANTOS, L. L., VIANA, A. S. and MALHEIROS, C. (2022), ‘The Spatial Planning System in Portugal’, Theoretical Framework Report on European Spatial Planning of Tourism Destinations.
Google Scholar

KAIKA, M. (2017), ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’: the New Urban Agenda as immunology … or … what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with «smart cities» and indicators’, Environment and Urbanization, 29 (1), pp. 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816684763
Google Scholar

KALLET, R. H. (2004), ‘How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper’, Respiratory Care, 49 (10), pp. 1229–1232.
Google Scholar

NANCY, J. L. (1991), ‘The inoperative community’, [in] CONNOR, P. (ed.), Theory and history of literature, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–42.
Google Scholar

VAN CAUWENBERGH, N., CIURÓ, A. B., and AHLERS, R. (2018), ‘Participatory processes and support tools for planning in complex dynamic environments: a case study on web-GIS based participatory water resources planning in Almeria, Spain’, Ecology and Society, 23 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09987-230202
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-11-17

How to Cite

Deuskar, A., Khozrevanidze, K., Ozeren, Z., & Paradowska, I. (2022). Dialogue with the community in the planning process. How to use the participatory approach as a planning tool for the community’s benefit?. European Spatial Research and Policy. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/esrap/article/view/15347

Funding data

  • Erasmus+
    Grant numbers 2019-1-PL01-KA203-064946