This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-20. Read the most recent version.

AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland

Authors

Marcin Feltynowski University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, ul. POW 3/5, 90-255 Łódź, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4919-2851
Agnieszka Rzeńca University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, ul. POW 3/5, 90-255 Łódź, Poland
Piotr Rzeńca Office of Spatial Planning of the Lodz Voivodship, al. Piłsudskiego 12, 90-051 Łódź, Poland
Wiktor Wróblewski Lodz University of Technology, Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning, ul. Stefana Żeromskiego 116, 90-543 Łódź, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07

Crossmark check for up

Keywords:

urban parks, park attractiveness, urban amenities, the AHP and TOPSIS methods

Abstract

Urban parks are significant elements that improve the quality of life in built-up areas. This research aims to identify the most attractive park in Lodz, Poland, using a set of assessment indicators. In our opinion, the decision-making process in assessing the attractiveness of urban parks may be assisted by Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Two methods were chosen from the MCDA group, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The research shows that the proposed methods reveal which park needs support and calls for investment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AZIMIFARD, A., MOOSAVIRAD, S. H. and ARIAFAR, S. (2018), ‘Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran’s steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods’, Resources Policy, 57, pp. 30−44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.002
Google Scholar

BAYCAN-LEVENT, T., VREEKER, R. and NIJKAMP, P. (2009), ‘A Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Green Spaces in European Cities’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 16 (2), pp. 193−213.
Google Scholar

BERDIE, A. D., OSACI, M., MUSCALAGIU, I. and BARZ, C. (2017), ‘A combined approach of AHP and TOPSIS methods applied in the field of integrated software systems’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 200. https://10.1088/1757-899X/200/1/012041
Google Scholar

BIERNACKA, M. and KRONENBERG, J. (2018), ‘Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces’, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 36, pp. 22−33. https://10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007
Google Scholar

CHEN, W. Y. and WANG, D. T. (2013), ‘Economic development and natural amenity: An econometric analysis of urban green spaces in China’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, pp. 435−442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.08.004
Google Scholar

CHENG, A. S. and MATTOR, K. M. (2006), ‘Why won’t they come? Stakeholder perspectives on collaborative national forest planning by participation level’, Environmental Management, 38, pp. 545−561.
Google Scholar

CZEMBROWSKI, P. and KRONENBERG, J. (2016), ‘Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 146, pp. 11−19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.10.005
Google Scholar

CZEMBROWSKI, P., KRONENBERG, J. and CZEPKIEWICZ, M. (2016), ‘Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing’, Ecological Economics, 130, pp. 166−175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.004
Google Scholar

de GROOT, R. S., WILSON, M. A. and BOUMANS, R. M. J. (2002), ‘A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services’, Ecological Economics, 41, pp. 393−408.
Google Scholar

DEGÓRSKA, B. and DEGÓRSKI, M. (2017), ‘Green Infrastructure as a Very Important Quality Factor in Urban Areas - Warsaw Case Study’, Europa XXI, 32, pp. 51−70.
Google Scholar

DENG, H., YEH, Ch. H. and WILLIS, R. J. (2000), ‘Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights’, Computers & Operations Research, 27 (10), pp. 963−973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6
Google Scholar

DONAHUE, M. L., KEELER, B. L., WOOD, S. A., FISHER, D. M., HAMPSTEAD, Z. A. and MCPHERSON, T. (2018), ‘Using social media to understand drivers of urban park visitation in the Twin Cities, MN’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, pp. 1−10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.006
Google Scholar

FELTYNOWSKI, M. (2023), ‘Urban green spaces in land-use policy – types of data, sources of data and staff – the case of Poland’, Land Use Policy, 127, 106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106570
Google Scholar

GLAESER, E. L., KOLKO, J. and SAIZ, A. (2001), ‘Consumer city’, Journal of Economic Geography, 1 (1), pp. 27−50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.27
Google Scholar

GLAESER, E. L., KOLKO, J. and SAIZ, A. (2003), ‘Consumers and Cities’, Research in Urban Policy, 9, pp. 177−183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3520(03)09005-6
Google Scholar

GRAY, J.and LÄMMERHIRT, D.(2017), Data And The City: New report on how public data is fostering civic engagement in urban regions, Cambridge: St John’s Innovation Centre.
Google Scholar

GUILFORD, J.P.(1942), Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Google Scholar

GUO, S., YANG, G., PEI, T., MA, T., SONG, C., SHU, H., DU, Y. and ZHOU, Ch. (2019), ‘Analysis of factors affecting urban park service area in Beijing: Perspectives from multi-source geographic data’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, pp. 103−117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.016
Google Scholar

HANINE, M., BOUTKHOUM, O., TIKNIOUINE, A. and AGOUTI, T. (2016), ‘Application of an integrated multicriteria decision making AHPTOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection’, Springer Plus, 5, p.263. https://10.1186/s40064-016-1888-z
Google Scholar

HUANG, J. (2008), ‘Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection’, 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2008.4670971
Google Scholar

HWANG, Ch.L.and YOON, K.(1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. A State of the Art Survey, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar

KITCHIN, R.(2014), The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar

KOBRYŃ, A. (2014), Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenią, Warszawa: Difin.
Google Scholar

MARKUSEN, A. (2006), ‘Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists’, Environment and Planning A, 38 (10), pp. 1921−1940. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38179
Google Scholar

MCNEUR, C. (2016), ‘Parks, People, and Property Values: The Changing Role of Green Spaces in Antebellum Manhattan’, Journal of Planning History, 16 (2), pp. 98−111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513216657563
Google Scholar

MEEROW, S. and NEWELL, J. P. (2017), ‘Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, pp. 62−75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
Google Scholar

MENKE, P. (2016), ‘Grüne Infrastruktur – Konzepte und Strategien zur Förderung eines Bewusstseins für den Wert von Stadtgrün’, Standort, 40 (2), pp. 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-016-0424-2
Google Scholar

MILLER, G. A. (1994), ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’, Psychological Review, 101 (2), pp. 343–352.
Google Scholar

NILSSON, H., NORDSTRÖM, E. M. and ÖHMAN, K. (2016), ‘Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS’, Forests, 7 (5), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
Google Scholar

NORDSTRÖM, E. M., ERIKSSON, L. O. and ÖHMAN, K. (2010), ‘Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden’, Forest Policy and Economics, 12, pp. 562−574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006
Google Scholar

OLEKSIEJUK, E.and JANKOWSKA, A.(2007), Zieleń miejska – naturalne bogactwo miasta. Lasy w miastach Unii Europejskiej – zasady gospodarowania i ochrona, Toruń: Polskie Zrzeszenie Inżynierów i Techników Sanitarnych Oddział Toruń.
Google Scholar

ONDER, E. and DAG, S. (2013), ‘Combining Analytical Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Approaches for Supplier Selection in a Cable Company’, Journal of Business, Economics & Finance, 2 (2), pp. 56−74.
Google Scholar

ÖNÜT, S. and SONER, S. (2008), ‘Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment’, Waste Management 28 (9), pp. 1552−1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019
Google Scholar

OZTURK, D. and BATUK, F. (2011), ‘Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for Spatial Decision Problems’, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/2011/Gi4DM/PDF/PP12.pdf [accessed on: 27.02.2022].
Google Scholar

PIETRZYK-KASZYŃSKA, A., CZEPKIEWICZ, M. and KRONENBERG, J. (2017), ‘Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, pp. 85−95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012
Google Scholar

PODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A., PRZYWOJSKA, J. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2022), ‘A Public Value-Based, Multilevel Evaluation Framework to Examine Public Bike-Sharing Systems. Implications for Cities’ Sustainable Transport Policies’, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 23 (2), pp. 180−194. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2022-0016
Google Scholar

PODGÓRNIAK-KRZYKACZ, A. and TRIPPNER-HRABI, J. (2021), ‘Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9 (2), pp. 651−662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003.
Google Scholar

PRAKASH, Ch. and BARUA, M. K. (2015), ‘Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment’, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, pp. 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.03.001
Google Scholar

Public Space Charter (in Polish: Karta Przestrzeni Publicznej) (2009). http://www.tup.org.pl/down-load/KartaPrzestrzeniPublicznej.pdf [accessed on: 10.01.2022].
Google Scholar

ROKHSARI, S. and SADEGHI-NIARAKI, A. (2015), ‘Urban Network Risk Assessment Based on Data Fusion Concept using Fuzzy-AHP, TOPSIS and VIKOR in GIS Environment’, Iranian Journal of Operations Research, 6 (2), pp. 73−86.
Google Scholar

SAATY, T.L.and VARGAS, L.G.(2012), Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: Springer.
Google Scholar

SAATY, T.L.(1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill.
Google Scholar

SAATY, T. L. (2007), ‘Multi-decisions decision-making: In addition to wheeling and dealing, our national political bodies need a formal approach for prioritization’, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, pp. 1001−1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.023
Google Scholar

SAATY, T. L. (2008), ‘Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process’, International Journal Services Sciences, 1 (1), pp. 83−98.
Google Scholar

SAATY, T.L.and KEARNS, K.P.(1985), Analytical Planning. The Organization of System, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar

SENDZIMIR FOUNDATION, A Report From the Project ‘Count on Green’. https://uslugiekosystemow.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/report_count_on_green.pdf [accessed on: 20.01.2022].
Google Scholar

SOKOŁOWICZ, M. (2017), ‘Udogodnienia miejskie – element publicznego wymiaru zasobów mieszkaniowych’, Folia Oeconomica Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, 6 (332), pp. 125−142. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.332.09
Google Scholar

TOŁWIŃSKI, T. (1963), Urbanistyka. Tom III Zieleń w urbanistyce, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

WRÓBLEWSKI, W. and KROC, T. (2022), ‘Współczesne podejście do terenów zieleni w mieście a ich utrzymanie i rozwój w Łodzi’, Builder, 294 (1), pp. 9−11. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.5802
Google Scholar

XIAO, Y., LI, Z. and WEBSTER, Ch. (2016), ‘Estimating the mediating effect of privately-supplied green space on the relationship between urban public green space and property value: Evidence from Shanghai, China’, Land Use Policy, 54, pp. 439−447. https://10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.001
Google Scholar

YAMU, C. and FRANKHAUSER, P. (2015), ‘Spatial accessibility to amenities, natural areas and urban green spaces: using a multiscale, multifractal simulation model for managing urban sprawl’, Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 42 (6), pp. 1054−1078. https://10.1068/b130171p
Google Scholar

YUE, Z. (2011), ‘A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS’, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (4), pp. 1926−1936.
Google Scholar

ZACHARIASZ, A. (2006), Zieleń jako współczesny czynnik miastotwórczy ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli parków publicznych, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30 — Updated on 2023-12-20

Versions

How to Cite

Feltynowski, M., Rzeńca, A., Rzeńca, P., & Wróblewski, W. (2023). AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland. European Spatial Research and Policy, 30(1), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07 (Original work published June 30, 2023)