Extended MR with Nesting of Predicate Expressions as a Basic Logic for Social Phenomena

Aleksander Parol; Krzysztof  Pietrowicz; Joanna Szalacha-Jarmużek

doi:10.18778/0138-0680.2021.09

Authors

Aleksander Parol Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Department of Philosophy, ul. Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7700-1800
Krzysztof Pietrowicz Nicolaus Copernicus University, Institute of Sociology, ul. Fosa Staromiejska 1a, 87-100 Torun, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-4672
Joanna Szalacha-Jarmużek Nicolaus Copernicus University, Institute of Sociology, ul. Fosa Staromiejska 1a, 87-100 Torun, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6445-8385

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.2021.09

Keywords:

logic for social sciences, positional logic, realisation operator, social phenomena

Abstract

In this article, we present the positional logic that is suitable for the formalization of reasoning about social phenomena. It is the effect of extending the Minimal Realisation (MR) logic with new expressions. These expressions allow, inter alia, to consider different points of view of social entities (humanistic coefficient). In the article, we perform a metalogical analysis of this logic. Finally, we present some simple examples of its application.

References

[1] F. Bianchi, F. Squazzoni, Agent–based Models in Sociology, WIREs Computational Statistics, vol. 7 (2015), pp. 284–306, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wics.1356
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1356

[2] M. Gianluca, Agent–based Models and Methodological Individualism: Are They Fundamentally Linked?, L’Année Sociologique, vol. 70(1) (2020), pp. 197–229, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/anso.201.0197
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.201.0197

[3] G. C. Homans, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, no. 40 in Social Forces, Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York (1961), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2574301
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2574301

[4] T. Jarmużek, A. Parol, On Some Language Extension of Logic MR: A Semantic and Tableau Approach, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 68(4) (2020), pp. 345–366, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rf20684-16
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf20684-16

[5] T. Jarmużek, A. Pietruszczak, Completenes of Minimal Positional Calculus, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 13 (2004), pp. 147–162, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2004.009
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2004.009

[6] D. Jemielniak, Socjologia 2.0: o Potrzebie Łączenia Big Data z Etnografią Cyfrową, Wyzwaniach Jakościowej Socjologii Cyfrowej i Systematyzacji Pojęć (Sociology 2.0: On the Need to Combine Big Data with Digital Ethnography, the Challenges of Qualitative Digital Sociology, and Definitions’ Systematization), Studia Socjologiczne, vol. 229(2) (2018), pp. 7–29, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24425/122461
Google Scholar

[7] J. Malinowski, K. Pietrowicz, J. Szalacha-Jarmużek, Logic of Social Ontology and Łoś Operator, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 29 (2020), pp. 239–258, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2020.005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2020.005

[8] R. Maris, The Logical Adequacy of Homans’ Social Theory, American Sociological Review, vol. 35(6) (1970), pp. 1069–1081, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2093383
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2093383

[9] D. O’Sullivan, M. Haklay, Agent–Based Models and Individualism: Is the World Agent–Based?, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 32(8) (2000), pp. 1409–1425, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a32140
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a32140

[10] F. Znaniecki, The Object Matter of Sociology, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 32 (1927), pp. 529–584, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/214184
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/214184