Grzegorczyk Algebras Revisited

Michał M. Stronkowski

doi:10.18778/0138-0680.47.2.05

Authors

Michał M. Stronkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.47.2.05

Keywords:

Grzegorczyk algebras, free Boolean extensions of Heyting algebras, stable homomorphisms

Abstract

We provide simple algebraic proofs of two important facts, due to Zakharyaschev and Esakia, about Grzegorczyk algebras.

References

[1] G. Bezhanishvili and N. Bezhanishvili, An algebraic approach to canonical formulas: modal case, Studia Logica 99 (2011), pp. 93–125.
Google Scholar

[2] G. Bezhanishvili, N. Bezhanishvili and R. Iemhoff, Stable canonical rules, Journal of Symbolic Logic 81 (2016), pp. 284–315.
Google Scholar

[3] W. J. Blok, Varieties of interior algebras, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (1976), URL=http://www.illc.uva.nl/Research/Dissertations/HDS-01-Wim_Blok.text.pdf
Google Scholar

[4] W. J. Blok and Ph. Dwinger, Equational classes of closure algebras. I, Indagationes Mathematicae 37 (1975), pp. 189–198.
Google Scholar

[5] A. Chagrov and M. Zakharyaschev, Modal logic, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.
Google Scholar

[6] A. Chagrov and M. Zakharyashchev, Modal companions of intermediate propositional logics, Studia Logica 51 (1992), pp. 49–82.
Google Scholar

[7] L. L. Esakia, On the theory of modal and superintuitionistic systems, [in:] V. A. Smirnov (ed.), Logical inference, Nauka, Moscow (1979), pp. 147–172 (in Russian).
Google Scholar

[8] L. L. Esakia, On the variety of Grzegorczyk algebras, [in:] Studies in nonclassical logics and set theory, Nauka, Moscow (1979), pp. 257–287 (in Russian).
Google Scholar

[9] S. Ghilardi, Continuity, freeness, and filtrations, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 20 (2010), pp. 193–217.
Google Scholar

[10] S. Givant and P. Halmos, Introduction to Boolean algebras, Springer, New York, 2009.
Google Scholar

[11] A. Grzegorczyk, Some relational systems and the associated topological spaces, Fundamenta Mathematicae 60 (1967), pp. 223–231.
Google Scholar

[12] D. C. Makinson, On the number of ultrafilters of an infinite boolean algebra, Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 15 (1969), pp. 121–122.
Google Scholar

[13] L. L. Maksimova and V. V. Rybakov, The lattice of normal modal logics, Algebra and Logic 13 (1974), pp. 105–122.
Google Scholar

[14] J. C. C. McKinsey and A. Tarski, On closed elements in closure algebras, Annals of Mathematics 47 (1946), pp. 122–162.
Google Scholar

[15] A. Y. Muravitsky, The embedding theorem: its further developments and consequences. Part I, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2006),pp. 525–540.
Google Scholar

[16] M. M. Stronkowski, Free Boolean extensions of Heyting algebras, Advances in Modal Logic, Budapest, 2016, pp. 122–126 (Extended abstract).
Google Scholar

[17] M. M. Stronkowski, On the Blok-Esakia theorem for universal classes, arXiv:1810.09286.
Google Scholar

[18] F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev, On the Blok-Esakia theorem, [in:] G. Bezhanishvili (ed.), Leo Esakia on Duality in Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2014), pp. 99–118.
Google Scholar

[19] M. Zakharyaschev, Canonical formulas for K4. Part I. Basic results Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1992), pp. 1377–1402.
Google Scholar