A night on the town: when the importance of mate acquisition overrides intrasexual competition

Abraham P. Buunk; Karlijn Massar

doi:10.2478/anre-2014-0021

Authors

Abraham P. Buunk Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
Karlijn Massar Work & Social Psychology, Maastricht University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2014-0021

Keywords:

mate choice, mating, sex differences

Abstract

It is argued that, while men may be intrasexually more competitive than women, to attract potential mates, men will, more than women, associate with same-sex friends who are attractive to the opposite sex. Therefore, more than women, men will choose more physically attractive and dominant companions in a mating context than in a neutral context. In Study 1 among 262 participants a mating scenario (going to a party) and a neutral scenario (seeing a movie) were developed, and it was shown that the mating scenario did indeed induce more a mating context than the neutral scenario. In Study 2 among 167 participants the hypotheses were tested by examining the preferences for a companion in both scenarios. The findings from Study 2 supported the predictions. In response to the mating as compared to the neutral scenario, men, but not women, found the attractiveness of a companion more important, preferred a more socially dominant companion, and found the social dominance of a companion more important. Men as well as women preferred in general companions who were less attractive than themselves, but preferred a more attractive companion in a mating than in a neutral context. The effects for social dominance were in general more pronounced among individuals high in sociosexual orientation (SOI). To conclude especially mens’ attitude towards same sex others in a mating context may be driven by the desire to associate, rather than to compete, with same-sex others who are attractive to the opposite sex.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainsworth SE, Maner JK. 2012. Sex begets violence: mating motives, social dominance, and physical aggression in men. J Pers Soc Psychol 103:819–29.

Benenson JF, Saelen C, Markovits H, McCabe S. 2008. Sex Differences in the value of parents versus same-sex peers. Evol Psychol 6:13–28.

Benenson, JF, Markovits H, Fitzgerald C, Geoffroy D, Flemming J, Kahlenberg SM, Wrangham RW. 2009. Males’ greater tolerance of same-sex peers. Psychol Sci 20:184–90.

Bleske, A.L., & Shackelford, T.K. (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combating mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Pers Relationship 8:407–24.

Bleske-Rechek AL, Buss DM. 2001. Opposite-sex friendship: sex differences and similarities in initiation, selection, and dissolution. PSPB 27:1310–23.

Buunk AP, Fisher M. 2009. Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 7:37–48.

Buunk AP, Ybema JF. 2003. Feeling bad, but satisfied: The effects of upward and downward comparison with other couples upon mood and marital satisfaction. Br J Soc Psychol 42:613–28.

Campbell A. 2002. A mind of her own: the evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chagnon NA. 1988. Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–92.

Chagnon N. 1977. Yanomamo: the Fierce People. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Cummins D. 2005. Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In: DM Buss, editor. The handbook of evolutionary psychology Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. 676–97.

Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

Gangestad SE, Simpson JA. 1990. Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. J Pers 58:69–96.

Geary DC. 2005. Evolution of paternal investment. In: DM Buss, editor. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. 483–505.

Geary DC. 1999. Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Geary DC, Byrd-Craven J, Hoard MK, Vigil J, Numtee C. 2003. Evolution and development of boys’ social behavior. Dev Rev 23:444–70.

Gilby IC, Brent LJN, Wroblewski EE, Rudicell RS, Hahn BH, Goodall J, Pusey AE 2013. Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:373–81.

Goodall J. 1986. Social rejection, exclusion, and shunning among the Gombe chimpanzees. Ethology and Sociobiology 7:227–36.

Häfner M. 2004. How dissimilar others may still resemble the self: assimilation and contrast after social comparison. J Consum Psychol 14:187–96.

Hall JA. 2010. Sex differences in friendship expectations: a meta-analysis. J Soc Pers Relat 28:723–74.

Low BS. 2000. Why sex matters: a Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Massar K, Buunk AP, Rempt S. 2012. Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Pers Individ Differ 52:106-09.

Schmitt DP. 2005. Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In: DM Buss, editor. The handbook of evolutionary psychology Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. 258–91.

Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. 1991. Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 60:870–83.

Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. 1992. Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. J Pers 60:31–51.

Simpson J, Wilson C, Winterheld H. 2004. Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In: J Harvey, A Wenzel, and S Sprecher, editors. The handbook of sexuality in close relationships .Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 87–112.

Simpson JA, Gangestad SW, Christensen PN Leck K. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:159–72.

Tesser A. 1988. Towards a self evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In: L Berkowitz, editor. Advances is experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press. 181–227.

Tesser A, Campbell J, Smith M. 1984. Friendship choice and performance: self-evaluation maintenance in children. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:561–74.

Vaillancourt T, Sharma A. 2011. Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behav 37:569–77.

Van Vugt M, De Cremer D. Janssen DP. 2007. Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male warrior hypothesis. Psychol Sci 18:19–23.

Vigil JM. 2007. Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature 18:143–61.

Wrangham R, Peterson D. 1996. Demonic males: apes and the origins of human violence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.

Young AF, Gabriel S, Schlager OM. 2014. Does this friend make me look fat? Appearance-related comparisons within women’s close friendships. Basic Appl Soc Psych 36:145–54.