Predicting Prosociality in Primates: Socio-Ecological Influences and a Framework of Inter-Brain Neural Synchronization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.88.4.01Keywords:
prosociality, comparative behavior, inter-brain neural synchronization, neural systems, machine learningAbstract
Prosocial co-operation is critical for evolution and survival on Earth and has crucially shaped the development of Homo sapiens. Inter-brain neural synchronization (IBNS) has been shown to enhance prosocial co-operation in mammals and avians. The selection pressures which led to the development of IBNS throughout primate evolution are currently unknown. This paper aims to expand the understanding of IBNS in non-human primates by reviewing the literature on various primate populations that display prosocial behaviors that could correlate with IBNS. Binary logit modelling using machine learning methods was applied to social, ecological, morphological, and biological (SEMB) variables correlated with prosocial behaviors to obtain probabilities of prosociality. Our results suggest that select SEMB variables such as daily socialisation, food-sharing and hierarchy structure are strong predictors of prosocial behaviors in primates. We provide a framework that offers testable hypotheses for the existence of IBNS in primates based on the correlations between SEMB variables and prosocial behaviors. We also offer ideas of the ecological/behavioral forces that may correlate with neural activation patterns of primate IBNS. Through comparison to Homo sapiens models, these findings suggest IBNS in primates may exist beyond cercopithecids and may be evoked by similar socio-ecological contexts. However, some key neurological distinctions between the two groups exist, influencing which distinct patterns of behavior may evoke IBNS (relative to their socio-ecological context).
Downloads
References
Abraham E, Hendler T, Shapira-Lichter I, Kanat-Maymon Y, Zagoory-Sharon O, Feldman R. 2014. Father’s brain is sensitive to childcare experiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(27): 9792–9797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402569111
View in Google Scholar
Abraham E, Hendler T, Shapira-Lichter I, Kanat-Maymon Y, Zagoory-Sharon O, Feldman R. 2014. Father’s brain is sensitive to childcare experiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(27): 9792–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402569111
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402569111
Allison, P. D. 1999. Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press.
View in Google Scholar
Amici F, Widdig A, MacIntosh AJ, Francés VB, Castellano-Navarro A, Caicoya AL, Karim-ullah K, Maulany RI, Ngakan PO, Hamzah AS, Majolo B. 2020. Dominance style only partially predicts differences in neophobia and social tolerance over food in four macaque species. Sci Rep 10(1): 22069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79246-6
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79246-6
Barton RA, Byrne RW, Whiten A. 1996. Ecology, Feeding Competition and Social Structure in Baboons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38(5): 321– 29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4601210
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050248
Beeler JA, Kisbye Dreyer J. 2019. Synchronicity: the role of midbrain dopamine in whole-brain coordination. eNeuro 6(2): ENEURO.0345–18.2019. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0345-18.2019
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0345-18.2019
Ben Mocha Y, Scemama de Gialluly S, Griesser M, Markman S. 2023. What is cooperative breeding in mammals and birds? Removing definitional barriers for comparative research. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 98(6): 1845–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12986
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12986
Boehm C. 1993. Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Curr Anthropol 34(3): 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/204166
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204166
Boesch C. 2009. The real chimpanzee: sex strategies in the forest. Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627132
Boinski S, Garber PA .2000. On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar
Boyd R, Richerson PJ. 2009. Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1533): 3281–88. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0134
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0134
Brattstrom BH. 1974. The evolution of reptilian social behavior. Am Zool 14(1): 35– 49. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.35
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.35
Brosnan SF, De Waal FB. 2002. A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Hum Nat 13: 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1017-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1017-2
Burkart JM, Allon O, Amici F, Fichtel C, Finkenwirth C, Heschl A, Huber J, Isler K, Kosonen ZK, Martins E, Meulman EJ, Richiger R, Rueth K, Spillmann B, Wiesendanger S, van Schaik SP. 2014. The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nat Commun 5(1), 4747. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5747
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5747
Campbell MW, de Waal FB. 2014. Chimpanzees empathize with group mates and humans, but not with baboons or unfamiliar chimpanzees. Proc Biol Sci 281(1782), 20140013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0013
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0013
Cerrito P, Gascon E, Roberts AC, Sawiak SJ, Burkart JM. 2024. Neurodevelopmental timing and socio-cognitive development in a prosocial cooperatively breeding primate (Callithrix jacchus). Sci Adv 10(44), eado3486. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado3486
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado3486
Cerrito P, Spear JK. 2022. A milk-sharing economy allows placental mammals to overcome their metabolic limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119(10), e2114674119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114674119
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114674119
Chaudhary N, Salali GD, Thompson J, Rey A, Gerbault P, Stevenson EG, Dyble M, E. Page A, Smith D, Mace R, Vinicius L. 2016. Competition for Cooperation: variability, benefits and heritability of relational wealth in hunter-gatherers. Sci Rep 6(1): 29120. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29120
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29120
Clark G, Henneberg M. 2021. Cognitive and behavioral modernity in Homo erectus: Skull globularity and hominin brain evolution. Anthropol Rev 84(4): 467–85. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0030
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0030
Clay Z, de Waal FB. 2013. Bonobos respond to distress in others: consolation across the age spectrum. PloS one 8(1): e55206. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055206
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055206
Concato J, Peduzzi P, Holford TR., Feinstein AR. 1995. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 48(12): 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2
Cortes C, Mohri M. 2004. Confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 17.
View in Google Scholar
Crick J, Suchak M, Eppley TM, Campbell MW, De Waal FB. 2013. The roles of food quality and sex in chimpanzee sharing behavior (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour 150(11): 1203–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003087
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003087
Darwin C. 1888. The descent of man: and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, Albemarle Street.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.106688
De Waal FB, Suchak M. 2010. Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1553): 2711–22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0119
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0119
De la Fuente MF, Sueur C, Garber PA, Bicca‐Marques JC, Souto A, Schiel N. 2022. Foraging networks and social tolerance in a cooperatively breeding primate (Callithrix jacchus). J Anim Ecol 91(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13609
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13609
De Waal F. 2011. Empathy in primates and other mammals. In: J Decety (ed.). Empathy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262016612.003.0006
De Waal FB, van Roosmalen A. 1979. Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5: 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302695
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302695
De Waal FB, Leimgruber K, Greenberg AR. 2008. Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA105(36): 13685–89. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807060105
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807060105
De Waal FB. 1989. Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. J Hum Evol 18(5): 433–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(89)90074-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(89)90074-2
De Waal, FB, Luttrell, LM, Canfield, ME. 1993. Preliminary data on voluntary food sharing in brown capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol, 29(1), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350290108
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350290108
Decety J. 2010. The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Dev Neurosci 32(4): 257–67. https://doi.org/10.1159/000317771
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000317771
Dissanayake E. 1999. Antecedents of musical meaning in the mother-infant dyad. In: B Cooke and F Turner (eds.). Biopoetics: Evolutionary Explorations in the Arts. Lexington, Kentucky: ICUS. 367–97.
View in Google Scholar
Dissanayake E. 2004. Motherese is but one part of a ritualized, multimodal, temporally organized, affiliative interaction. Behav Brain Sci 27(4): 512–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0432011X
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0432011X
Doody JS, Burghardt GM, Dinets V. 2013. Breaking the social–non‐social dichotomy: a role for reptiles in vertebrate social behavior research?. Ethology 119(2): 95– 103. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12047
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12047
Dubois C, Call J, DeTroy S, Schütte S, Haun DB, Van Leeuwen EJ, Kaufhold SP. 2021. Chimpanzees behave prosocially in a group-specific manner. Sci Adv 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7982
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7982
du Prel JB, Hommel G, Röhrig B, Blettner M. 2009. Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(19): 335–39. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335
Dubuc C, Hughes KD, Cascio J, Santos L R. 2012. Social tolerance in a despotic primate: Co‐feeding between consortship partners in rhesus macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 148(1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22043
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22043
Falk D. 2004. Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese? Behav Brain Sci 27(4): 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000111
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000111
Fishburn FA, Murty VP, Hlutkowsky CO, MacGillivray CE, Bemis LM, Murphy ME, Huppert TJ, Perlman SB. 2018. Putting our heads together: interpersonal neural synchronization as a biological mechanism for shared intentionality. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 13(8): 841–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy060
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy060
Froese T, Loh CL, Putri F. 2024. Inter-brain desynchronization in social interaction: a consequence of subjective involvement?. Front Hum Neurosci 18: 1359841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1359841
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1359841
Garber PA. 1987. Foraging Strategies among Living Primates. Annu Rev Anthropol 16: 339– 64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155875
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.002011
Gardner MJ, Altman DG. 1986. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 292(6522): 746–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746
Gvirts-Probolovski HZ, Dahan A. 2021. The potential role of dopamine in mediating motor function and interpersonal synchrony. Biomedicines 9(4): 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040382
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040382
Gvirts-Provolovski HZ, Perlmutter R. 2021. How can we prove the causality of inter-brain synchronization? Front Hum Neurosci 15: 651949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.651949
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.651949
Haas R, Watson J, Buonasera T, Southon J, Chen JC, Noe S, Smith K, Viviano Llave C, Eerkens J, Parker G. 2020. Female hunters of the early Americas. Sci Adv 6(45): eabd0310. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0310
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0310
Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M. 2000. Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59(4): 771–85. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1377
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1377
Harrell FE. 2001. Volume 608: Regression modelling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. 219–74. Springer.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7_10
Harrod EG, Coe CL, Niedenthal PM. 2020. Social structure predicts eye contact tolerance in nonhuman primates: evidence from a crowd-sourcing approach. Sci Rep 10(1): 6971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63884-x
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63884-x
Hart D. 2007. Predation on Primates: A Biogeographical Analysis. In: S Gursky-Doyen, & KAI Nekaris (eds.). Primate anti-predator strategies. New York, New York: Springer.
View in Google Scholar
Hasson U, Frith CD. 2016. Mirroring and beyond: coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371(1693): 20150366. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0366
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0366
Hayashi M, Matsuzawa T. 2017. Mother–infant interactions in captive and wild chimpanzees. Infant Behav Dev 48: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.008
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.11.008
Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. 2018. Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biometrical journal. Biom Z 60(3): 431–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700067
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700067
Henazi SP, Barrett L. 1999. The value of grooming to female primates. Primates 40: 47–59. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02557701.pdf
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557701
Hensher DA, Stopher PR. 1979. Behavioural Travel Modelling. 1st edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156055
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156055
Hintz WD, Lonzarich DG. 2018. Maximizing foraging success: the roles of group size, predation risk, competition, and ontogeny. Ecosphere 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2456
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2456
Hirter KN, Miller EN, Stimpson CD, Phillips KA, Hopkins WD, Hof PR, Sherwood CC, Lovejoy CO, Raghanti MA. 2021. The nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum exhibit greater dopaminergic innervation in humans compared to other primates. Brain Struct Funct 226(6): 1909–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02300-0
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02300-0
Hoffmann S, Trost L, Voigt C, Leitner S, Lemazina A, Sagunsky H, Abels M, Kollmansperger S, Maat AT, Gahr M. 2019. Duets recorded in the wild reveal that interindividually coordinated motor control enables cooperative behavior. Nat Commun 10(1): 2577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10593-3
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10593-3
Hohn TI, Lin B, Miller CM, Foxfoot IR, Venkataraman VV, Ruckstuhl KE, Nguyen N, Fashing PJ. 2024. Post-Conflict Behaviors of Wild Gelada Monkeys (Theropithecus gelada) at Guassa, Ethiopia. Int J Primatol, 45(5), 1083–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00438-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-024-00438-2
Hu Y, Hu Y, Li X, Pan Y, Cheng X. 2017. Brain-to-brain synchronization across two persons predicts mutual prosociality. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12(12): 1835–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx118
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx118
Isler K, van Schaik CP. 2012. Allomaternal care, life history and brain size evolution in mammals. J Hum Evol, 63(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.03.009
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.03.009
Jaeggi AV, Van Schaik CP. 2011. The evolution of food sharing in primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65(11): 2125–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1221-3
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1221-3
Jafari M, Ansari-Pour N. 2019. Why, when and how to adjust your p values? Cell J 20(4): 604–07. https://doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2019.5992
View in Google Scholar
Janson CH. 1994. The last ape: pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Am Sci 82(4): 388–89.
View in Google Scholar
Kano T, Mulavwa M. 1984. Feeding ecology of the pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba. In: R Susman (ed.). The pygmy chimpanzee: Evolutionary biology and behavior. Boston, Massachusetts: Springer. 233–74.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0082-4_10
Kiffner C, Paciência FM, Henrich G, Kaitila R, Chuma IS, Mbaryo P, Knauf S, Kioko J, Zinner D. 2022. Road-based line distance surveys overestimate densities of olive baboons. PloS one 17(2): e0263314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263314
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263314
Kim J, Bang H. 2016. Three common misuses of P values. Dent Hypotheses 7(3): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/2155-8213.190481
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2155-8213.190481
Kingsbury L, Huang S, Wang J, Gu K, Golshani P, Wu YE, Hong W. 2019. Correlated neural activity and encoding of behavior across brains of socially interacting animals. Cell 178(2): 429–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.022
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.022
Kinreich S, Djalovski A, Kraus L, Louzoun Y, Feldman R. 2017. Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions. Sci Rep 7(1): 17060. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17339-5
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17339-5
Kopp KS, Liebal K. 2018. Conflict resolution in socially housed Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii). PeerJ 6: e5303. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5303
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5303
Koski SE, Sterck EHM. 2010. Empathic chimpanzees: A proposal of the levels of emotional and cognitive processing in chimpanzee empathy. Eur J Dev Psychol 7(1): 38–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620902986991
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620902986991
Kreider JJ, Kramer BH, Komdeur J, Pen I. 2022. The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders. Evol Lett 6(6): 450–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.307
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.307
Kurihara Y, Takahashi T, Osu R. 2024. The topology of interpersonal neural network in weak social ties. Sci Rep 14(1): 4961. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55495-7
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55495-7
Kuroshima H, Fujita K. 2018. Affective States, Motivation, and Prosocial Behaviour in Primates. In: LD Di Paolo, F Di Vincenzo, F De Petrillo (eds.). Evolution of Primate Social Cognition. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research, Vol. 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_3
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93776-2_3
Legg EW, Ostojić L, Clayton NS. 2015. Food sharing and social cognition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 6(2): 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1329
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1329
Lester DB, Rogers TD, Blaha CD. 2010. Acetylcholine-dopamine interactions in the pathophysiology and treatment of CNS disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther 16(3): 137–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00142.x
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00142.x
Li L, Wang H, Luo H, Zhang X, Zhang R, Li X. 2020. Interpersonal Neural Synchronization During Cooperative Behavior of Basketball Players: A fNIRS-Based Hyperscanning Study. Front Hum Neurosci 14: 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00169
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00169
Liu T, Duan L, Dai R, Pelowski M, Zhu C. 2021. Team-work, team-brain: exploring synchrony and team interdependence in a nine-person drumming task via multi-participant hyperscanning and inter-brain network topology with fNIRS. NeuroImage 237: 118147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118147
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118147
Lopresti-Goodman SM, Villatoro-Sorto B. 2022. The benefits and challenges of conducting primate research in different settings. Animals 13(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010133
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010133
Lotter LD, Kohl SH, Gerloff C, Bell L, Niephaus A, Kruppa JA, Dukart J, Schulte-Rüther M, Reindl V, Konrad K. 2023. Revealing the neurobiology underlying interpersonal neural synchronization with multimodal data fusion. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105042
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105042
Love TM. 2014. Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 119: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011
Lu H, Wang X, Zhang Y, Huang P, Xing C, Zhang M, Zhu X. 2023. Increased inter-brain synchronization and neural efficiency of the frontal cortex to enhance human coordinative behavior: A combined hyper-tES and fNIRS study. NeuroImage 282: 120385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120385
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120385
Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T. 2012. Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 279(1736): 2151–56. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2468
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2468
Marcoulides KM, Raykov T. 2019. Evaluation of variance inflation factors in regression models using latent variable modeling methods. Educ Psychol Meas 79(5): 874–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418817803
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164418817803
Melis AP, Semmann D. 2010. How is human cooperation different? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1553): 2663–74. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0157
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0157
Miall DS, Dissanayake E. 2003. The poetics of babytalk. Human Nature 14: 337–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1010-4
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1010-4
Mine JG, Slocombe KE, Willems EP, Gilby IC, Yu M, Thompson ME, Muller MN, Wrangham RW, Townsend SW, Machanda ZP. 2022. Vocal signals facilitate cooperative hunting in wild chimpanzees. Sci Adv 8(30). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo5553
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo5553
Montesinos López OA, Montesinos López A, Crossa J. 2022. Multivariate statistical machine learning methods for genomic prediction. Springer Nature. 71–108.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89010-0_3
Mu Y, Guo C, Han S. 2016. Oxytocin enhances inter-brain synchrony during social coordination in male adults. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 11(12): 1882–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw106
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw106
Murray E, Wise S, Rhodes S. 2011. What Can Different Brains Do with Reward? In: Gottfried, J editor. Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor & Francis.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b10776-6
Newson R. 2006. Efficient calculation of jackknife confidence intervals for rank statistics. J Stat Softw 15: 1–10 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v015.i01
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v015.i01
Ogawa Y, Shimada S. 2023. Inter-subject EEG synchronization during a cooperative motor task in a shared mixed-reality environment. Virt World 2(2): 129–143. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds2020008
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds2020008
Okada KI, Takeya R, Tanaka M. 2022. Neural signals regulating motor synchronization in the primate deep cerebellar nuclei. Nat Commun 13(1): 2504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30246-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30246-2
Ong WS, Madlon-Kay S, Platt ML. 2021. Neuronal correlates of strategic cooperation in monkeys. Nat Neurosci 24(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00746-9
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00746-9
Palagi E, Dall’Olio S, Demuru E, Stanyon R. 2014. Exploring the evolutionary foundations of empathy: consolation in monkeys. Evol Hum Behav 35(4): 341–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.04.002
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.04.002
Palagi E, Norscia I. 2015. The season for peace: reconciliation in a despotic species (Lemur catta). PloS one 10(11): e0142150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142150
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142150
Pandit SA, van Schaik CP. 2003. A model for leveling coalitions among primate males: toward a theory of egalitarianism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55: 161–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0692-2
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0692-2
Pearson A, Polly PD. 2023. Temporal lobe evolution in extant and extinct Cercopithecoidea. J Mamm Evol 30(3), 683– 694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-023-09664-6
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-023-09664-6
Pearson A, Polly PD. 2024. Temporal lobe evolution in Hominidae and the origin of human lobe proportions. Am J Biol Anthropol 185(4), e25027. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.25027
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.25027
Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. 1995. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol 48(12): 1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8
Pinheiro M. 2022. Egalitarian sharing explains food distributions in a small-scale society. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 25(3). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4835
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4835
Platt ML, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. 2016. Adaptations for social cognition in the primate brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371(1687), 20150096. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0096
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0096
Polit DF, Beck CT. 2010. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud 47(11): 1451–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
Previc FH. 2009. The dopaminergic mind in human evolution and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581366
Primate Information Network (and publications therein). Wisconsin National Primate Centre. (n.d.). Retrieved 2023. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/
View in Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
View in Google Scholar
Raghanti MA, Edler MK, Stephenson AR, Munger EL, Jacobs B, Hof PR, Sherwood CC, Holloway RL, Lovejoy CO. 2018. A neurochemical hypothesis for the origin of hominids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(6): E1108–E1116. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719666115
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719666115
Ramakrishnan A, Ifft PJ, Pais-Vieira M, Byun YW, Zhuang KZ, Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. 2015. Computing arm movements with a monkey brainet. Sci Rep 5(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10767
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10767
Reimers L, Diekhof EK. 2015. Testosterone is associated with cooperation during inter-group competition by enhancing parochial altruism. Front Neurosci 9: 183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00183
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00183
Rennung M, Göritz AS. 2016. Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony. Z Psychol 224(3): 168–18. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252
Rilling JK. 2014. Comparative primate neuroimaging: insights into human brain evolution. Trends Cogn Sci 18(1): 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.013
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.013
Rose MC, Styr B, Schmid TA, Elie JE, Yartsev MM. 2021. Cortical representation of group social communication in bats. Science, 374(6566): eaba9584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9584
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9584
Sáez I, Zhu L, Set E, Kayser A, Hsu M. 2015. Dopamine modulates egalitarian behavior in humans. Curr Biol 25(7): 912–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.071
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.071
Samuni L, Preis A, Mielke A, Deschner T, Wittig RM, Crockford C. 2018. Social bonds facilitate cooperative resource sharing in wild chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 285(1888): 1471–2954. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1643
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1643
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance (and publications therein) (n.d.). Retrieved 2023. https://ielc.libguides.com/sdzg/main/journals_databases/databases
View in Google Scholar
Saniotis A, Grantham JP, Kumaratilake J, Henneberg M, Mohammadi K. 2021. Going Beyond Brain Size. Anthropologie 59(1): 101–06. https://doi.org/10.26720/anthro.20.08.10.1
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26720/anthro.20.08.10.1
Sapolsky RM. 1990. Adrenocortical function, social rank, and personality among wild baboons. Biol Psychiatry 28(10): 862–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(90)90568-M
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(90)90568-M
Sapolsky RM. 2005. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science 308(5722): 648–52. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106477
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106477
Sevastidis J. 2024. Primate_Var_List_2025.xlsx (Version 3). The University of Adelaide. https://doi.org/10.25909/25895407.v3
View in Google Scholar
Sevastidis J. 2025. Full List of Correlations for Predicting Prosociality in Primates: Socio-Ecological Influences and a Framework of Inter-Brain Neural Synchronization (Version 1). The University of Adelaide. https://doi.org/10.25909/28735580
View in Google Scholar
Shultz S, Dunbar RI. 2022. Socioecological complexity in primate groups and its cognitive correlates. Phil Trans R Soc B 377(1860). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0296
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0296
Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Henrich J, Lambeth SP, Shapiro S. 2013. Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers. Anim Behav 85(5): 941–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.014
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.014
Sinha N, Maszczyk T, Wanxuan Z, Tan J, Dauwels J. 2016. EEG hyperscanning study of inter-brain synchrony during cooperative and competitive interaction. In 2016 Conf Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern (SMC) 4813–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844990
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844990
Sterelny K. 2021. The Pleistocene social contract: Culture and cooperation in human evolution. Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197531389.001.0001
Strum SC. 1981. Processes and products of change: baboon predatory behavior at Gilgil, Kenya. In: S Harding, & G Teleki (eds.). Omnivorous primates: Gathering and hunting in human evolution. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. 255–302.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/hard92188-009
Swedell L. 2012. Primate sociality and social systems. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10).
View in Google Scholar
Szymanski C, Pesquita A, Brennan AA, Perdikis D, Enns JT, Brick TR, Müller V, Lindenberger U. 2017. Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation. NeuroImage 152: 425–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013
Tai YM, Chen MM, Zhang YH, Ma AX, Wang H, Wang X. 2022. Social Rank or Social Bonds: Which one Facilitates Coalition Formation in Male Tibetan Macaques? Biology 11(9): 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091269
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091269
Tennie C, Jensen K, Call J. 2016. The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees. Nat Commun 7(1): 13915. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13915
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13915
Titus AL, Knoll K, Sertich JJ, Yamamura D, Suarez CA, Glasspool IJ, Ginouves JE, Lukacic AK, Roberts EM. 2021. Geology and taphonomy of a unique tyrannosaurid bonebed from the upper Campanian Kaiparowits Formation of southern Utah: implications for tyrannosaurid gregariousness. PeerJ 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11013
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11013
Tokuyama N, Furuichi T. 2016. Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Anim Behav 119: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.021
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.021
Tomasello M. 2023. Differences in the Social Motivations and Emotions of Humans and Other Great Apes. Hum Nat 34(4): 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09464-0
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09464-0
Tombak KJ, Wikberg EC, Rubenstein DI, Chapman CA. 2019. Reciprocity and rotating social advantage among females in egalitarian primate societies. Anim Behav 157: 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.010
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.010
Townsend C, Ferraro JV, Habecker H, Flinn MV. 2023. Human cooperation and evolutionary transitions in individuality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 378(1872). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0414
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0414
Treves A. 2000. Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav 60(6): 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1528
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1528
Trumble BC, Smith EA, O’Connor KA, Kaplan HS, Gurven MD. 2013. Successful hunting increases testosterone and cortisol in a subsistence population. Proc R Soc B 281(1776): 20132876. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2876
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2876
Tseng PH, Rajangam S, Lehew G, Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. 2018. Interbrain cortical synchronization encodes multiple aspects of social interactions in monkey pairs. Sci Rep 8(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22679-x
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22679-x
Turner JB, Turner RJ. 2013. Social Relations, Social Integration, and Social Support. In: CS Aneshensel, JC Phelan, A Bierman (eds.). Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_17
Valencia AL, Froese T. 2020. What binds us? Inter-brain neural synchronization and its implications for theories of human consciousness. Neurosci Conscious 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa010
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa010
van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. 2011. “mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.” J Stat Softw 45(3): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V045.I03
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
van Houwelingen G, van Dijke M. 2023. Investing to gain others’ trust: Cognitive abstraction increases prosocial behavior and trust received from others. Plos one 18(4): e0284500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284500
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284500
van Schaik CP. 1989. The Ecology of Social Relationships Amongst Female Primates. In: V Standen, & R Foley (eds.). Comparative Socioecology: the Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
View in Google Scholar
Wang J, Meng F, Xu C, Zhang Y, Liang K, Han C, Gao Y, Yu X, Li Z, Zeng X, Ni J. 2025. Simultaneous intracranial recordings of interacting brains reveal neurocognitive dynamics of human cooperation. Nat Neurosci 28(1): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01824-y
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01824-y
Wass SV, Whitehorn M, Haresign IM, Phillips E, Leong V. 2020. Interpersonal neural entrainment during early social interaction. Trends Cogn Sci 24(4): 329–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006
Webb CE, Romero T, Franks B, De Waal FB. 2017. Long-term consistency in chimpanzee consolation behaviour reflects empathetic personalities. Nat Commun 8(1): 292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00360-7
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00360-7
Wendland JR, Lesch KP, Newman TK, Timme A, Gachot-Neveu H, Thierry B, Suomi SJ. 2006. Differential functional variability of serotonin transporter and monoamine oxidase a genes in macaque species displaying contrasting levels of aggression-related behavior. Behav Genet 36: 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-9017-8
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-9017-8
Wever MC, van Houtum LA, Janssen LH, Will GJ, Tollenaar MS, Elzinga BM. 2021. Neural signatures of parental empathic responses to imagined suffering of their adolescent child. NeuroImage, 232. 117886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117886
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117886
Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
Williams L, Shultz S, Jensen K. 2022. The primate workplace: Cooperative decision-making in human and non-human primates. Front Ecol Evol 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.887187
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.887187
Wise SP. 2020. The evolution of the prefrontal cortex in early primates and anthropoids. In JH Kaas editor. Evolutionary neuroscience 2nd edition. Elsevier Academic Press. 669–707.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820584-6.00028-3
Yamamoto S. 2017. Primate empathy: three factors and their combinations for empathy-related phenomena. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 8(3), 10.1002/wcs.1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1431
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1431
Zhang W, Rose MC, Yartsev MM. 2022. A unifying mechanism governing inter-brain neural relationship during social interactions. Elife 11 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70493.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70493
Zhang W, Yartsev MM. 2019. Correlated neural activity across the brains of socially interacting bats. Cell 178(2): 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.023
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.023
Zhu P, Liu W, Zhang X, Li M, Liu G, Yu Y, Li Z, Li X, Du J, Wang X, Grueter CC. 2023. Correlated evolution of social organization and lifespan in mammals. Nat Commun 14: 372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-35869-7
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-35869-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


