A violent structure. Southern perspective on the practice of forensic anthropology as a public service

Katarzyna Górka

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.85.4.02

Authors

Katarzyna Górka Department of Anthropology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-5810

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.85.4.02

Keywords:

forensic anthropology, human rights, Global South, Brazil, infrastructure, violence, structural violence, theory

Abstract

Global South perspective rarely reaches the academic vanguard. While they represent over 80% of the world population, the voices from less developed regions often are ignored in academic debate. This fact produces an important disequilibrium in relation to the dissemination of knowledge, sharing of experiences and exchange of thoughts and, consequently, undermines and hinders the development of scientific disciplines. Forensic anthropology is no exception in this trend.

The present article brings up the subject of the context of forensic anthropology in Brazil to demonstrate the interconnection of the professional situation of this discipline, its structural and bureaucratic limitations and their effect on the perpetuation of human rights violation. Various aspects of daily practice of forensic anthropology in a context devoid of basic resources generate a setting that affects both the victims and their families. Despite an outstanding performance and dedication of professionals, structural limitations often substantially affect the effectiveness of their service. The present article discusses these aspects in a conceptual framework of the relation between the practice of forensic anthropology and human rights violation. In this research, Brazil serves as a case-study, an intensively studied subject that brings interpretations that can be applied in a broader context.

The article aims at opening a broader, international debate that would increase the visibility of the relationship between the practice of forensic anthropology and the structure generating and/or maintaining violence in a specific economic and legislative context especially present in the countries of the so-called global South.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adovasio JM. 2011. An “outsider” look at forensic anthropology. In: Dirkmaat DC, editor. A Companion to Forensic Anthropology. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Blackwell, 683–689.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118255377.ch34

Albanese J, Saunders SR. 2006. Is It Possible to Escape Racial Typology in Forensic Identification? In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and forensic medicine: Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 281–316.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-099-7_12

Baraybar JP, Blackwell R. 2014. Where are they? Missing forensics and memory. Ann Anthropol Pract 38(1):22–42.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/napa.12040

Bethard JD, DiGangi EA. 2020. Letter to the Editor–Moving Beyond a Lost Cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry Estimates in the United States. Forensic Sci Int 65(5):1791–1792.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14513

Bufacci V. 2007. Violence by omission. In: Bufacci V, editor. Violence and social justice. Cork, UK: University College, 48–65.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246416_4

Calmon M. 2019. Forensic anthropology and missing persons: A Brazilian perspective. Forensic Sci Int 298:425.e1-425.e6.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.032

Christensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ. 2019. Forensic Anthropology: Current Methods and Practice, 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815734-3.00005-1

Clifford Boyd C, Boyd CD. 2018. Forensic Anthropology: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119226529

Clifford Boyd C, Boyd CD. 2011. Theory and the Scientific Basis for Forensic Anthropology. J Forensic Sci 56(6):1407–1415.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01852.x

Collyer FM. 2018. Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, Global South. Curr Sociol 66(1):56–73.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020

Cunha E, Cattaneo C. 2006. Forensic anthropology: The state of the art. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic anthropology and forensic medicine: Complementary sciences from recovery to cause of death. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press, 39–56.
View in Google Scholar

Cunha E, Ubelaker DH. 2020. Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review. Forensic Sci Res 5(2):89–97.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060

Cunha E. 2010. Some reflections on the popularity of forensic anthropology today. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol 22:190–193.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13219-010-0025-8

Davilla J. 2013. Dictatorships in Latin America. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
View in Google Scholar

de Lima Amaral EF. 2013. Brazil: internal migration. In: Ness I, editor. The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration; Hoboken – NJ, United States: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–7.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm075

DiGangi EA, Bethard JD. 2021. Uncloaking a Lost Cause: Decolonizing ancestry estimation in the United States. Am J Phys Anthropol 175:422–436.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24212

Dirkmaat DC, Cabo LL, Ousley SD, et al. 2008. New perspectives in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol 137(S47):33–52.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20948

Dunn RR, Spiros MC, Kamnikar KR, et al. 2020. Ancestry estimation in forensic anthropology: A review. WIREs Forensic Sci 2:e1369.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1369

Ferllini R. 1999. The role of forensic anthropology in human rights issues. In: Fargrieve S, editor. Forensic osteological analysis: A book of case studies. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 287–301.
View in Google Scholar

FMB. 2020. Institutos médico-legais: Segundo CFM, Brasil apresenta discrepâncias de acesso. Federação Médica Brasileira. Available at: http://portalfmb.org.br/2016/10/19/institutos-medico-legais-segundo-cfm-brasil-apresenta-discrepancias-de-acesso-so/ [Accessed 31 October 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Galtung J. 1969. Violence, peace, and peace research. J Peace Res. 6(3):167–191.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301

Gaspar Neto VV. 2017. Biological anthropology in Brazil: A preliminary overview. Vibrant – (Brasília) 14(3):e14303.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412017v14n3p034

Górka K, Plens CR. 2021. In search of identity – the field of forensic anthropology in Brazil. J Forensic Sci 66(1):44–55.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14566

Górka K, Plens CR. 2020. Na fronteira Brasil – Polônia: cooperação acadêmica em Antropologia Forense a serviço dos Direitos Humanos. Revista Historia Debates e Tendências Passo Fundo 20(3):14–27.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5335/hdtv.20n.3.11647

Hughes SC. 2001. The Involvement of the Forensic Anthropologist in Human Rights Issues. Master’s thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4136 [Accessed 13 September 2021].
View in Google Scholar

IBGE. 2020. IBGE divulga estimativa da população dos municípios para 2020. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadística. Available at: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-sala-de-imprensa/2013-agencia-de-noticias/releases/28668-ibge-divulga-estimativa-da-populacao-dos-municipios-para-2020 [Accessed 5 November 2020].
View in Google Scholar

ICMP. 2020. Legal Frameworks and Rights. International Commission for Missing Persons. Available at: https://www.icmp.int/the-missing/legal-frameworks-andrights/ [Accessed 25 May 2020].
View in Google Scholar

IPEA. 2019. Atlas da violência. Instituto de Pesquisa Económica Aplicada. Available at: https://www.ipea.gov.br/atlasviolencia/dados-series/20 [Accessed 17 November 2021].
View in Google Scholar

King R. 2011. Power and Networks in Worldwide Knowledge Coordination: The Case of Global Science. High Educ Policy 24:359–376.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.9

Klepinger LL. 2006. Fundamentals of Forensic Anthropology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470007729

Legarin M. 2010. Brazil must investigate and punish crimes committed under military dictatorship. Available at: https://cejil.org/comunicado-de-prensa/brazil-must-investigate-and-punish-crimes-committed-under-military-dictatorship/ [Accessed 20 October 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Loveman BE. 2018. Military Government in Latin America, 1959–1990. In: Vinson B, editor. Oxford Bibliographies in “Latin American Studies”. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766581/obo-9780199766581-0015.xml [Accessed 20 October 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Martinez M, Sá C. 2020. Highly Cited in the South: International Collaboration and Research Recognition Among Brazil’s Highly Cited Researchers. J Stud Int Educ 24(1):39–58.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888890

Mazur M, Górka K, Alemán Aguilera I.2022. Smile photograph analysis and its connection with focal length as one of identification methods in forensic anthropology and odontology. Forensic Sci Int 335:111285.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111285

Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. 2021a. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/desaparecidos/cadastro-nacional [Accessed 6 October 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. 2021b. Available at: https://www.gov.br/mj/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/ministerio-da-justicae-seguranca-publica-lanca-campanha-decoleta-de-dna-para-auxiliar-familias-nabusca-de-pessoas-desaparecidas [Accessed 6 October 2022].
View in Google Scholar

Miranda GE, Freitas SG, Maia LVA, et al. 2016. An unusual method of forensic human identification: use of selfie photographs. Forensic Sci Int 263:14–17.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.028

Odeth LE. 2010. A comparative analysis of Global North and Global South economies. J Sustain Dev Afr 12(3):338–348.
View in Google Scholar

Passalacqua NV, Pilloud MA, Congram D. 2021. Forensic Anthropology as a Discipline. Biology 10:691.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10080691

Peters MA. 2006. The rise of global science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations. Eur J Educ 41(2):225–244.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00257.x

Potter H. 2018. A Lei da Anistia e o esquecimento dos crimes da ditadura militar. Available at: https://www.dw.com/pt-br/a-lei-da-anistia-e-o-esquecimento-doscrimes-da-ditadura-militar/a-45082182 [Accessed 20 October 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Ross AH, Pilloud M. 2021. The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: A call for reform. Am J Phys Anthropol 176(4):672–683.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24384

Ross AH, Williams SE. 2021. Ancestry Studies in Forensic Anthropology: Back on the Frontier of Racism. Biology 10:602.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070602

Sabzalieva E, Martinez M, Sá C. 2020. Moving Beyond “North” and “South”: Global Perspectives on International Research Collaborations. J Stud Int Edu 24(1):3–8.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319889882

SENASP. 2012. Diagnostico da Perícia Criminal no Brasil. [pdf]. Ministério da Justiça, Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Pública. Available at: https://www.mpma.mp.br/arquivos/CAOPCEAP/Diagn%C3%B3stico%20Per%C3%ADcia%20Criminal%20no%20Brasil.pdf [Accessed 8 September 2021].
View in Google Scholar

Silva RF, Franco A, Seixas JR, et al. 2016. Positive identification of a decomposed human body through forensic anthropology and smile photographs a case report. Eur J Forensic Sci 3(4):1–4.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ejfs.205494

Silva RF, Pereira SD, Prado FB, et al. 2008. Forensic odontology identification using smile photograph analysis-case reports. J Forensic Odontostomatol 26(1):12–7. PMID: 22689352.
View in Google Scholar

SINALID. 2022. Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público. Available at: https://www.cnmp.mp.br/portal/institucional/comissoes/comissao-de-defesa-dos-direitos-fundamentais/sinalid/informacoes-sobre-o-sistema [Accessed 2 October 2022].
View in Google Scholar

Smay D, Armelagos G. 2000. Galileo Wept: A critical assessment of the use of race in Forensic Anthropology. Transform Anthropol 9(2):19–29.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/tran.2000.9.2.19

Squires K, García-Mancuso R. 2021. Ethical challenges associated with the study and treatment of human remains in anthropological sciences in the 21st century. Revista Argentina de Antropologia Biológica 23(2):1–22.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/18536387e034

Trindade Filho, A. 2018. Instituto de Pesquisa de DNA Forense, Polícia Civil do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Personal communication, 29.05.2018.
View in Google Scholar

UN. 2020. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights [Accessed 15 September 2021].
View in Google Scholar

UNIFESP. 2021. Grupo de Trabalho Perus identifica segundo desaparecido político. Boletim da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Available at: https://www.unifesp.br/boletins-anteriores/item/3642-grupo-de-trabalho-perus-identifica-segundo-desaparecido-politico [Accessed 17 November 2021].
View in Google Scholar

UNODC. 2019. Global Study on Homicide: Homicide trends, patterns and criminal justice response [pdf]. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes. Vienna. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet2.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2020].
View in Google Scholar

Winburn AP, Clemmons CMJ. 2021. Objectivity is a myth that harms the practice and diversity of forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synergy 3:100196.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100196