Czy „formowanie się pojęć u zwierząt” może być weryfikowalną hipotezą empiryczną?

Maciej Blaszak

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.58.09

Authors

Maciej Blaszak Instytut Filozofii, UAM, Szamarzewskiego 89 Poznań

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.58.09

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess whether experimental research in cognitive ethology has indeed made sense of the claim that animals have concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheney D.L., R.M. Seyfarth , 1990, How monkeys see the world, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226218526.001.0001

Cheney D.L., R.M. Seyfarth, 1992, Precis o f 'How monkeys see the world’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, 135
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067911

Dawkins M.S., 1993, Through Our Eyes Only? The search for animal consciousness, W.H. Freeman, New York
View in Google Scholar

Dennett D.C., 1983, Intentional systems in cognitive ethology: The ’Panglossian paradigm’ defended, Behav. and Brain Sciences, 6, 343
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00016393

Fodor J., 1991,. A -Theory o f Content, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA
View in Google Scholar

Gould S.J., R. Lewontin, 1979, The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of Adaptationalist Program, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 205, 581
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086

Griffin D.R., 1992, Animal Minds, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
View in Google Scholar

Hubel D.H., T.tf. Wiesel, 1968, Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex, Journal of Physiology, 195, 215
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455

Komatsu L.K., 1992, Recent Views of Conceptual Structure, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 500
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.500

Krebs J., 1990, Animal Language, [w:] Images and Understanding, H. Barlow, C. Blackmore, M. Weston-Smith (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Kripke S., 1972, Naming and necessity, [w:] Semantics of Natural Language, D. Davidson, G. Harman (Eds), D. Riedel, Dordrecht
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9

Lea S., 1984, In what sense do pigeons learn concepts?, [w:] Animal Cognition, H. Roitblat, T. Bever, H. Terrace (Eds), Erlbaum, New Jersey
View in Google Scholar

Marr D., 1982, Vision, W.H. Freeman, New York
View in Google Scholar

Millikan R.G., 1984, Language, Thought and other Biological Categories, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA
View in Google Scholar

Millikan R.G., 1995, Biosemantics. Explanation in Biopsychology, [w:] Philosophy of psychology. Debates on Psychological Explanation, vol. 1, C. Macdonald, G. Macdonald (Eds), Blackwell, Oxford
View in Google Scholar

Neisser U., 1989, From direct perception to conceptual structure, [w:] Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, U. Neisser (Ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
View in Google Scholar

Putnam H., 1975, The meaning of ’meaning", [w:] Language, mind and knowledge, K. Gunderson (Ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Sc., vol. 7, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota
View in Google Scholar

Rlstau C., (Ed.), 1990, Cognitive ethology: The minds o f other animals, Erlbaum, New Jersey
View in Google Scholar

Seyfarth R.M., D.L. Cheney, 1992, Do monkeys understand their relations? [w:] Machiavellian Intelligence, R.W. Byrne, A. Whiten (Eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford
View in Google Scholar

Smith E., 1989, Concepts and Induction, [w:] Foundations of Cognitive Science, M. Posner, (Ed.) The MIT Press, Cambridge MA
View in Google Scholar