How do pairs matched in physical attractiveness form if people are unaware of their own attractiveness?

Krzysztof Kościński

doi:10.2478/v10044-010-0007-y

Authors

Krzysztof Kościński Institute of Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University; Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-010-0007-y

Keywords:

assortative mating, self-assessment, methodology

Abstract

The correlation of physical attractiveness in romantic partners has been widely documented. However, it has also repeatedly been demonstrated that people are largely unaware of their own attractiveness, which raises the question about the mechanism responsible for the within-pair matching. One hitherto unexplored possibility is that low accuracy in attractiveness self-assessments results from methodological drawbacks. Participants were usually asked to rate their attractiveness on a numeric scale, and independent judges evaluated them on the basis of facial photographs. We hypothesized that the accuracy of self-assessment may be increased if (1) participants and judges evaluate the same characteristic, e.g., both groups assess facial attractiveness, (2) own attractiveness is estimated in a comparative manner (with reference to attractiveness of other individuals) rather than by abstract numbers, (3) judges rate attractiveness of people as seen in video clips rather than in photographs. To test these hypotheses we photographed and videotaped faces of 96 women and 78 men. Independent judges rated attractiveness from these photographs and video clips, and the participants assessed own attractiveness in several ways. None of the above hypotheses was confirmed by statistical analysis. We discuss how the within-pair matching in attractiveness can arise, given such poor awareness of own appeal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allison, D.B., M.C. Neale, M.I. Kezis, V.C. Alfonso, S. Heshka, et al., 1996, Assortative mating for relative weight: Genetic implications, Behav. Genet., 26, 103-11
View in Google Scholar

Asendorpf J.B., L. Penke, M.D. Back, 2011, From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample, Eur. J. Pers., 25, 16-30
View in Google Scholar

Back M.D., L. Penke, S.C. Schmukle, K. Sachse, P. Borkenau, et al., 2011, Why mate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting and physical attractiveness, Eur. J. Pers., 25, 120-32
View in Google Scholar

Bar-Tal D., L. Saxe, 1976, The perception of similarly and dissimilarly attractive couples and individuals, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 33, 772-81
View in Google Scholar

Berscheid E., K. Dion, E. Walster, W. Walster, 1971, Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of matching hypothesis, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 7, 173-89
View in Google Scholar

Bleske-Rechek A., M. Lighthall, 2010, Attractiveness and rivalry in women's friendships with women, Hum. Nat., 21, 82-97
View in Google Scholar

Bleske-Rechek A., M.W. Remiker, J.P. Baker, 2008, Narcissistic men and women think they are so hot - but they are not, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 45, 420-24
View in Google Scholar

Blond A., 2008, Impacts of exposure to images of ideal bodies on male body dissatisfaction: A review, Body Image, 5, 244-250
View in Google Scholar

Breese E.L., 1956, The genetical consequences of assortative mating, Heredity, 10, 323-43
View in Google Scholar

Brewer G., J. Archer, J. Manning, 2007, Physical attractiveness: The objective ornament and subjective self-ratings, J. Evol. Psychol., 5, 29-38
View in Google Scholar

Burley N., 1983, The meaning of assortative mating, Ethol. Sociobiol., 4, 191-203
View in Google Scholar

Buss D., 1999, Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind, Allyn & Bacon, Boston
View in Google Scholar

Buston P.M., S.T. Emlen, 2003, Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 8805-10
View in Google Scholar

Chu S., D. Farr, L.C. Muñoz, J.E. Lycett, 2011, Interpersonal trust and market value moderates the bias in women's preferences away from attractive high-status men, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 51, 143-47
View in Google Scholar

Clark A., 2004, Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women's sociosexuality, Evol. Hum. Behav., 25, 113-24
View in Google Scholar

Cornwell R.E., M.J. Law Smith, L.G. Boothroyd, F.R. Moore, H.P. Davis, et al., 2006, Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B., 361, 2143-54
View in Google Scholar

Courtiol A., M. Raymond, B. Godelle, J.-B. Ferdy, 2010, Mate choice and human stature: Homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences, Evolution, 64, 2189-203
View in Google Scholar

Crow J.F., J. Felsenstein, 1968, The effect of assortative mating on the genetic composition of a population, Eugen. Q., 15, 85-97
View in Google Scholar

Currie T.E., A.C. Little, 2009, The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness, Evol. Hum. Behav., 30, 409-16
View in Google Scholar

DeBruine L.M., B.C. Jones, F.G. Smith, A.C. Little, 2010, Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 36, 751-58
View in Google Scholar

DeBruine L.M., A.C. Little, D.I. Perrett, B.C. Jones, 2008, Social perception of facial resemblance in humans, Arch. Sex. Behav., 37, 64-77
View in Google Scholar

Diener E., B. Wolsic, F. Fujita, 1995, Physical attractiveness and subjective well-being, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 69, 120-29
View in Google Scholar

Durante K.M., N.P. Li, 2009, Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women, Biol. Lett., 5, 179-82
View in Google Scholar

Edwards A.W.F., 1994, The fundamental theorem of natural selection, Biol. Rev., 69, 443-74
View in Google Scholar

Ellis B.J., H.H. Kelley, 1999, The pairing game: A classroom demonstration of the matching phenomenon, Teaching Psychol., 26, 118-21
View in Google Scholar

Feingold A., 1988, Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique, Psychol. Bull., 104, 226-35
View in Google Scholar

Feingold A., 1992, Good-looking people are not what we think, Psychol. Bull., 111, 304-341
View in Google Scholar

Ferguson G.A., Y. Takane, 1989, Statistical analysis in psychology and education (6th ed.), Mc-Graw-Hill, New York
View in Google Scholar

Folkes V.S., 1982, Forming relationships and the matching hypothesis, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 8, 631-36
View in Google Scholar

Fraccaro P.J., B.C. Jones, J. Vukovic, F.G. Smith, C.D. Watkins, et al., 2010, Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive, J. Evol. Psychol., 9, 57-67
View in Google Scholar

Fraley R.C., M.J. Marks, 2010, Westermarck, Freud, and the incest taboo: Does familial resemblance activate sexual attraction?, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 36, 1202-12
View in Google Scholar

Frederick D.A., M.G. Haselton, 2007, Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 33, 1167-83
View in Google Scholar

Gabriel M.T., J.W. Critelli, J.S. Ee, 1994, Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness, J. Pers., 62, 143-55
View in Google Scholar

Gavrilets S., 2003, Perspective: Models of speciation - What have we learned in 40 years?, Evolution, 57, 2197-215
View in Google Scholar

Gutierres S.E., D.T. Kenrick, J.J. Partch, 1999, Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: Contrast effects in self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 25, 1126-34
View in Google Scholar

Ha T., G. Overbeek, R.C.M.E. Engels, 2010, Effects of attractiveness and social status on dating desire in heterosexual adolescents: An experimental study, Arch. Sex. Behav., 39, 1063-71
View in Google Scholar

Harrison K., 2003, Television viewers' ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman, Sex Roles, 48, 255-64
View in Google Scholar

Haselton M.G., S.W. Gangestad, 2006, Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle, Horm. Behav., 49, 509-18
View in Google Scholar

Hill C.T., Z. Rubin, L.A. Peplau, 1976, Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs, J. Soc. Issues, 32, 147-68
View in Google Scholar

Hinsz V.B., 1989, Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples, J. Soc. Pers. Relat., 6, 223-229
View in Google Scholar

Hitsch G.J., A. Hortaçsu, D. Ariely, 2010, Matching and sorting in online dating. Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 130-63
View in Google Scholar

Holtzman N.S., M.J. Strube, 2010, Narcissism and attractiveness, J. Res. Pers., 44, 133-36
View in Google Scholar

Hönekopp J., 2006, Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness, J. Exp. Psychol., 32, 199-209
View in Google Scholar

Hume D.K., R. Montgomerie, 2001, Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of "quality" in women and men, Evol. Hum. Behav., 22, 93-112
View in Google Scholar

Huston T.L., 1973, Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 9, 32-42
View in Google Scholar

Irwin D.E., T. Price, 1999, Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation, Heredity, 82, 347-54
View in Google Scholar

Johnstone R.A., 1997, The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 40, 51-59
View in Google Scholar

Jokela M., 2009, Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: evidence from the late 20th century United States, Evol. Hum. Behav., 30, 342-50
View in Google Scholar

Kalick S.M., T.E. Hamilton, 1986, The matching hypothesis reexamined, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 51, 673-82
View in Google Scholar

Kościński K., 2007, Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol. Rev., 70, 45-79
View in Google Scholar

Kościński K., 2010, Do they know what they like? Intra-individual variation of female facial preferences, J. Evol. Psychol., 8, 23-55
View in Google Scholar

Kurzban R., J. Weeden, 2005, HurryDate: Mate preferences in action, Evol. Hum. Behav., 26, 227-44
View in Google Scholar

Kowner R., 1996, Susceptibility to physical attractiveness comparison: On the role of attributions in protecting self-esteem, Psychologia, 39, 150-62
View in Google Scholar

Lee L., G. Loewenstein, D. Ariely, J. Hong, J. Young, 2008, If I'm not hot, are you hot or not? Physical-attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one's own attractiveness, Psychol. Sci., 19, 669-77
View in Google Scholar

Lever J., D.A. Frederick, L.A Peplau, 2006, Does size matter? Men's and women's views on penis size across the lifespan, Psychol. Men Mascul., 7, 129-43
View in Google Scholar

Little A.C., D.M. Burt, I.S. Penton-Voak, D.I. Perrett, 2001, Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 268, 39-44
View in Google Scholar

Little A.C., D.M. Burt, D.I. Perrett, 2006, Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 40, 973-84
View in Google Scholar

Little A.C., B.C. Jones, R.P. Burriss, 2007, Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle, Horm. Behav., 51, 633-39
View in Google Scholar

Little A.C., H. Mannion, 2006, Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women, Anim. Behav., 72, 981-87
View in Google Scholar

Luo S., G. Zhang, 2009, What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study, J. Pers., 77, 933-63
View in Google Scholar

Manning J., 2002, Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health, Rutgers University Press, London
View in Google Scholar

Manning J.T., S. Quinton, 2007, Association of digit ratio (2D:4D) with self-reported attractiveness in men and women: Evidence from the BBC internet survey, J. Indiv. Differ., 28, 73-77
View in Google Scholar

Marcus D.K., R.S. Miller, 2003, Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 29, 325-35
View in Google Scholar

Mascie-Taylor C.G.N., 1987, Assortative mating in a contemporary British population, Ann. Hum. Biol., 14, 59-68
View in Google Scholar

McNulty J.K., L.A. Neff, B.R. Karney, 2008, Beyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage, J. Fam. Psychol., 22, 135-43
View in Google Scholar

Montoya R.M., 2008, I'm hot, so I'd say you're not: The influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 34, 1315-31
View in Google Scholar

Moore F.R., C. Cassidy, M.J.L. Smith, D.I. Perrett, 2006, The effects of female control of resources on sex-differentiated mate preferences, Evol. Hum. Behav., 27, 193-205
View in Google Scholar

Murstein B.I., 1972, Physical attractiveness and marital choice, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 22, 8-12
View in Google Scholar

Murstein B.I., P. Christy, 1976, Physical attractiveness and marriage adjustment in middleaged couples, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 34, 537-42
View in Google Scholar

Noles S.W., T.F. Cash, B.A. Winstead, 1985, Body image, physical attractiveness, and depression, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 53, 88-94
View in Google Scholar

Penton-Voak I.S., A.C. Little, B.C. Jones, D.M. Burt, B.P. Tiddeman, et al., 2003, Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens), J. Comp. Psychol., 117, 264-71
View in Google Scholar

Rand C.S., J.A. Hall, 1983, Sex differences in the accuracy of self-perceived attractiveness, Soc. Psychol. Q., 46, 359-63
View in Google Scholar

Rhodes G., 2006, The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 199-226
View in Google Scholar

Riebel K., M.-J. Holveck, S. Verhulst, T.W. Fawcett, 2010, Are high-quality mates always attractive? State-dependent mate preferences in birds and humans, Commun. Integr. Biol., 3, 271-73
View in Google Scholar

Roberts S.C., A.C. Little, A. Lyndon, J. Roberts, J. Havlicek, et al., 2009, Manipulation of body odour alters men's self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 31, 47-54
View in Google Scholar

Salska I., D.A. Frederick, B. Pawlowski, A.H. Reilly, K.T. Laird, et al., 2008, Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 44, 203-15
View in Google Scholar

Scott I.M., I.S. Penton-Voak, 2011, The validity of composite photographs for assessing masculinity preferences, Perception, 40, 323-31
View in Google Scholar

Shaw Taylor L., A.T. Fiore, G.A. Mendelsohn, C. Cheshire, 2011, "Out of my league": A realworld test of the matching hypothesis, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 37, 942-54
View in Google Scholar

Simão J., P.M. Todd, 2002, Modeling mate choice in monogamous mating systems with courtship, Adapt. Behav., 10, 113-36
View in Google Scholar

Simpson J.A., S.W. Gangestad, 1991, Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 60, 870-83
View in Google Scholar

Singh D., 2004, Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness, J. Sex. Res., 41, 43-54
View in Google Scholar

Spuhler J.N., 1968, Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics, Eugen. Q., 15, 128-40
View in Google Scholar

Steiger J.H., 1980, Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix, Psychol. Bull., 87, 245-51
View in Google Scholar

Stroebe W., C.A. Insko, V.D. Thompson, B.D. Layton, 1971, Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 18, 79-91
View in Google Scholar

Sugiyama L., 2005, Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective, [in:] The handbook of evolutionary psychology, D. Buss (ed.), Wiley, New York, 292-343
View in Google Scholar

Susanne C., 1977, Heritability of anthropological characters, Hum. Biol., 49, 573-80
View in Google Scholar

Swami V., D.A. Frederick, T. Aavik, L. Alcalay, J. Allik, et al., 2010, The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 36, 309-25
View in Google Scholar

Thiessen D., B. Gregg, 1980, Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective, Ethol. Sociobiol., 1, 111-40
View in Google Scholar

Todd P.M., G.F. Miller, 1999, From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search, [in:] Simple heuristics that make us smart, G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, the ABC Research Group (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 287-308
View in Google Scholar

Todd P.M., L. Penke, B. Fasolo, A.P. Lenton, 2007, Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 15011-16
View in Google Scholar

van Straa ten I., R.C.M.E. Engels, C. Finkenauer, R.W. Holland, 2009, Meeting your match: How attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 35, 685-97
View in Google Scholar

Vukovic J., D.R. Feinberg, B.C. Jones, L.M. DeBruine, L.L.M. Welling, et al., 2008, Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine men's voices, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 45, 451-56
View in Google Scholar

Wade T.J., 2000, Evolutionary theory and selfperception: Sex differences in body esteem predictors of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness and self-esteem, Int. J. Psychol., 35, 36-45
View in Google Scholar

Wade T.J., H. Abetz, 1997, Social cognition and evolutionary psychology: Physical attractiveness and contrast effects on women's self-perceived body image, Int. J. Psychol., 32, 35-42
View in Google Scholar

Wade T.J., A. Shanley, M. Imm, 2004, Second to fourth digit ratios and individual differences in women's self-perceived attractiveness, selfesteem, and body-esteem, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 37, 799-804
View in Google Scholar

Walster E., V. Aronson, D. Abrahams, L. Rottman, 1966, The importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 4, 508-16
View in Google Scholar

Watkins C.D., L.M. DeBruine, F.G. Smith, B.C. Jones, J. Vukovic, et al., 2011, Like father, like self: emotional closeness to father predicts women's preferences for self-resemblance in opposite-sex faces, Evol. Hum. Behav., 32, 70-75
View in Google Scholar

Weeden J., J. Sabini, 2007, Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students, Arch. Sex. Behav., 36, 79-88
View in Google Scholar

Welling L.L.M., B.C. Jones, L.M. DeBruine, 2008, Sex drive is positively associated with women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in men's and women's faces, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 44, 161-70
View in Google Scholar

White G.L., 1980, Physical attractiveness and courtship progress, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 39, 660-68
View in Google Scholar

Zajonc R.B., P.K. Adelmann, S.T. Murphy, P.M. Niendenthal, 1987, Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses, Motiv. Emot., 11, 335-46
View in Google Scholar