Utilitarianism – Doctrinal Analysis Evolution of Thought

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.14.1.11

Keywords:

utilitarianism, doctrinal analysis, evolution

Abstract

Utilitarianism as innovatory and original stream of ethical and political thought enrich philosophical discourse of last three centuries. Utilitarian thinkers pointed out that maximization of pleasure correlated with minimization of pain is correct way to create objective catalog of rules or behaviors which application resulted in formation of the highest utility, good for an individual and good for a society. From methodological point of view there are differences between utilitarian philosophers thought, such as: happiness, pleasure or utility guide to diametrical disaccord on ethical or institutional area. The present scientific analyzes of utilitarian thought represent attractive differences in interpretation of this doctrine. Despite of this utilitarianism does not include logical and intellectual strong arguments of protection individual man rights in the case of conflict with interest people at large. Thus this doctrine in eighteen and nineteen centuries match to postulate political egalitarianism, but in nowadays utilitarianism lost its strong ethical position. In the past utilitarianism was a political instrument attended to protect a majority of society from arbitrary reigning of small elite group of people. Modernly this thought legitimize coercion a will of majority even though other smaller group of citizens have different political point of view. This kind of thinking allow to objectify individual man which is only identified with instrumentality to maximization of utility. The author analyzed thought of Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Herbert Spencer. Afterwards he compared their doctrines with science literature and presented a thesis that is basic and universal principles of utilitarianism and it could be actual rules of political ethics under condition of limitation theory of utility by appending law of inviolability natural rights of man.

References

Berlin I., Four Essays of Liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1969.
Google Scholar

Boaz D., Libertarianizm, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2005.
Google Scholar

Copleston F., Historia filozofii, Instytut Wydawniczy PAX, Warszawa 1989, t. VIII.
Google Scholar

Górecki O., Korelacja etyki z gospodarką w etyce Herberta Spencera, w: „Annales. Etyka w życiu gospodarczym” 2010, t. XIII, nr 2.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.13.2.06

Gray J., Liberalizm, Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, Kraków 1994.
Google Scholar

Häyry M., Liberal Utylitarianism and Applied Ethics, Routledge Press, London 1994.
Google Scholar

Hoftstadter R., Social Darwinism in American thought 1860–1915, Pennsylvania University Press, Pennsylvania 1945.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512816976

Hołówka J., Wstęp do: J.S. Mill, O rządzie reprezentatywnym, Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, Kraków 1995.
Google Scholar

Hudzik J.P., Wykłady z filozofii polityki, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii CurieSkłodowskiej, Lublin 2002.
Google Scholar

Kasprzyk L., Idee społeczno-polityczne Herberta Spencera, Stenotypia, Kraków 1961.
Google Scholar

Kasprzyk L., Spencer, Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1967.
Google Scholar

Kelly P., Liberalizm, Wydawnictwo Sic!, Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar

Kowalczyk S., Liberalizm i jego filozofia, Wydawnictwo Unia, Katowice 1995.
Google Scholar

Król M., Filozofia polityczna, Znak, Kraków 2008.
Google Scholar

Kwaśnicki W., Historia myśli liberalnej, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar

Kymlicka W., Współczesna filozofia polityczna, Aletheia, Warszawa 2009.
Google Scholar

Ludwikowski R., Wolański J., J.S. Mill, Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1979.
Google Scholar

MacIntyre A., Krótka historia etyki, PWN, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar

Mill J.S., O rządzie reprezentatywnym, Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, Kraków 1995.
Google Scholar

Mill J.S., Utylitaryzm. O Wolności, PWN, Warszawa 2005.
Google Scholar

Quinton A., Utilitarian Ethics, Duckworth, London 1989.
Google Scholar

Rau Z., Liberalizm. Zarys myśli politycznej XIX i XX w., Aletheia, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar

Rau Z., Zapomniana wolność. W poszukiwaniu historycznych podstaw liberalizmu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2008.
Google Scholar

Rosenbaum N.L., Bentham’ Theory of The Modern State, Harvard University Press, Harvard 1978.
Google Scholar

Sheng C.L., A New Approach to Utilitarianism. A Unified Utilitarian Theory and Its Application to Distributive Justice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London 1991.
Google Scholar

Sheng C.L., A Utilitarian General Theory of Value, Value Inquiry Book Series Volume: 61, Amsterdam 1998.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495111

Spencer H., Jednostka wobec państwa, Liber, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

Spencer H., Social Statics, or the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed, London 1851.
Google Scholar

Szahaj A., Jakubowski M.N., Filozofia polityki, PWN, Warszawa 2005.
Google Scholar

Środa M., Indywidualizm i jego krytycy, Aletheia, Warszawa 2003.
Google Scholar

Taylor M.W., Men Versus the State. Herbert Spencer and Late Victoria Individualism, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2000.
Google Scholar

Tulejski T., Od zasady użyteczności do demokracji. Filozofia polityczna Jeremy Benthama, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź 2004.
Google Scholar

Vardy P., Grosch P., Etyka. Poglądy i problemy, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 1995.
Google Scholar

White S., Równość, Wydawnictwo Sic!, Warszawa 2008.
Google Scholar

Wroczyński R., Wstęp, w: H. Spencer, O wychowaniu umysłowym, moralnym i fizycznym, Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

Published

2011-01-01

How to Cite

Górecki, O. (2011). Utilitarianism – Doctrinal Analysis Evolution of Thought. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 14(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.14.1.11

Issue

Section

Articles