The impact of economic studies on students’ morality level

Bożena Klimczak

doi:10.18778/1899-2226.21.6.06

Autor

Bożena Klimczak Wrocław University of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.21.6.06

Słowa kluczowe:

morality level, experimental research of students’ morality level, impact of microeconomic curricula on students’ morality level

Abstrakt

Since the beginning of the 1980s, a study has been conducted among students of economics in the United States regarding their propensity for cooperation, philanthropy and keeping promises. Regardless of the methods used, the research results have shown lower readiness for cooperation among students of economics in comparison to students of other disciplines. Moreover, the results are even worse after completing a microeconomics course. Based on these findings, two hypotheses have been formulated: the auto-selection hypothesis and the indoctrination hypothesis. The aim of the paper is to formulate implications regarding the indoctrination hypothesis. A massive attendance at economic studies in Poland is an argument against the auto-selection hypothesis. However, unless the research is completed, this hypothesis cannot be rejected. The indoctrination hypothesis is more attractive due to the special cognitive and moral condition of post-communist society which economic studies lecturers are members of and due to the economic situation of higher education institutions. These circumstances which accompany the studying of economics in Poland favour, firstly, the introduction of highly specialised curricula which do not prepare students for understanding economic activity as a means for good life. Secondly, economic knowledge is interpreted by lecturers as a set of instructions to manipulate market players. Thirdly, lecturers’ attitudes and activities reflecting the principle that what is not legally prohibited is allowed are “awarded” with a higher financial status. These implications will be made probable by the analysis of the curricula and content of lectures in economic schools. Attention will be mostly focused on microeconomics; the main “defendant” accused of indoctrination in the American studies.

Bibliografia

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (1988). Economics. San Diego: HBJ.
Google Scholar

Begg, D., Fischer, S., & Dornbusch, R. (1993). Ekonomia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
Google Scholar

Broome, J. (1991). Utility. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 1–12.
Google Scholar

Brubaker, E. R. (1975). Free – Ride, Free – Revelation, on Golden Rule? Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 147–161.
Google Scholar

Carter, J., & Irons, M. (1991). Are economist different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171–177.
Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J., & Orbell, J. M. (1990). Cooperation for benefit for us – Not me, or my conscience. In J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Elster, J. (1985). Rationality, morality and collective action. Ethics, 96(1), 136–155.
Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. (2015). The moral effects of economic teaching. Sociological Forum, 30(1), 228–233.
Google Scholar

Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, V. (2003). Reasons for conflict: Lessons from bargaining experiments. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 159, 171–187.
Google Scholar

Frank R. H., Gilovich, T., Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–177.
Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5–20.
Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. (1996). The Prisoner’s Dilemma and the prisoners of the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 165–178.
Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1998). Value judgement: Improving our ethical beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388.
Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1985). Against parsimony. Economics and Philosophy, 1(1), 7–21.
Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1963). Traktat o naturze ludzkiej. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Jevons, W. S. (1871). Theory of political economy. London: Macmillan and Co.
Google Scholar

Kamerschen, D. R., McKenzie, R. B., & Nardinelli, C. (1989). Microeconomics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Google Scholar

Klimczak, B. (2005). Wpływ studiów ekonomicznych na poziom moralny studentów. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 8(2), 11–24.
Google Scholar

Laidler, D. (1981). Introduction to microeconomics. Oxford: Philip Allan.
Google Scholar

Lipsey, R. G., Steiner P. O., Purvis, D. D., & Courant, P. N. (1990). Economics. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar

Marwell, G., & Ames, R. (1981). Economists free ride. Does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295–310.
Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public groups and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Poundstone, E. (1992). Prisoner’s Dilemma John von Neumann, Game Theory and the puzzle of the bomb. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (1992). Economics: Mathematical politics or science of diminishing returns? Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Samuelson, C. D., Messick, D. M., Rutte C. G., & Wilke H. A. M. (1986). Individual restraint and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick, & C. G. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 29–54). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1985). Economics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.
Google Scholar

Sandel, M. J. (2007). Justice: A reader. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sandel, M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M. (1975). Preference and urgency. Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 655–669.
Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1981). Plural utility. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81(1), 193–216.
Google Scholar

Sirgy, M. J., & Chenting, S. (2000). The ethics of consumer sovereignty in an age of high tech. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 1–14.
Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1954). Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Google Scholar

Sulejewicz, A. (2002, December 10). Czy nauczanie ekonomii może być szkodliwe? Gazeta SGH, 165.
Google Scholar

Varian, H. R. (1995). Mikroekonomia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Wicksteed, P. H. (1910). Common sense of political economy. London: Macmillan and Co.
Google Scholar