The feminisation of precarity Poland compared to other countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.8.10Słowa kluczowe:
precarity, feminisation, dual-market theory, Post-FordismAbstrakt
Precarity applies to people who, in order to survive, need to work in a low-quality job, which is uncertain, temporary, low-paid, with no prospect of promotion, no security and no contract. In this sense, the precariat is a category related mostly to the secondary segments of the labour market according to the concept of the dual labour market. It is also the universal feature of Post-Fordism and the modern working conditions in which women, more often than men are located in the “worst” segment of the labour market. In this context, it is worth noting that since the beginning of the era of globalisation, women have mostly worked in the sectors more uncertain and unstable e.g., in the service industries and trade. It has been feminisation in a double sense of the word: there have been more and more working women, on the one hand, and on the other hand, women have usually taken the flexible jobs. Most of these jobs are precarious work. Precarity combined with job insecurity and low wages leaves the workforce in this group unable to plan for their future or afford a decent life. This article attempts to prove that the threat of precarity is more probable for women than men. This claim is supported by the OECD and Eurostat data on precarity for Poland and other European countries.
Bibliografia
Amamiya, K. (2009). The gloom of the precariat. Tokyo: Kodansha.
Google Scholar
Amamiya, K., & Beck, J. (2010). Suffering forces us to think beyond the right-left barrier. Mechademia, 5, 251–265.
Google Scholar
Bednarski, M. (2012). Koszty i korzyści zatrudnienia na czas określony. Polityka Społeczna, 9(462), 5–8.
Google Scholar
Blicharz, J. (2014). Kilka uwag na temat ubóstwa wśród kobiet w Polsce. In J. Blicharz, L. Klat-Wertelecka, & E. Rutkowska-Tomaszewska (Eds.), Oblicza polskiej biedy (pp. 39–46). Wrocław: E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa, Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Google Scholar
Borowska, M., & Branka, M. (2010). Równość szans kobiet i mężczyzn a rynek pracy. Warszawa: Centrum Rozwoju Zasobów Ludzkich.
Google Scholar
Castel, R. (2000). The roads to disaffiliation: Insecure work and vulnerable relationships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 519–535.
Google Scholar
Castel, R. (2002). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick (USA)–London: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Charkiewicz, E. (2010). Kobiety i ubóstwo – widzialna ręka neoliberalnego państwa. Biblioteka Online Think Tanku Feministycznego.
Google Scholar
Domański, H., & Karpiński, Z. (2012). Metodologia badań nad stratyfikacją społeczną. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar
Duell, N. (2004). Defining and assessing precarious employment in Europe: a review of main studies and surveys. Munich: ESOPE Project.
Google Scholar
Eurostat Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Google Scholar
Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2011). Caught in the work-citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalizations, 8(3), 325–341.
Google Scholar
Knapińska, M. (2014). Prekariat jako zjawisko występujące na współczesnym rynku pracy w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 2(7), 94–112.
Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 2(7), 127–191.
Google Scholar
Kryńska, E. (1996). Segmentacja rynku pracy: podstawy teoretyczne i analiza statystyczna. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Kryńska, E., & Kwiatkowski, E. (2013). Podstawy wiedzy o rynku pracy. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar
Mrozowicki, A., Roosalu, T., & Bajuk-Sencar, T. (2013). Precarious work in the retail sector in Estonia, Poland and Slovenia: Trade union responses in a time of economic crisis. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 19(2), 267–278.
Google Scholar
OECD Employment database. http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/onlineoecdemploy mentdatabase.htm
Google Scholar
OECD Indicators of Gender Equality in Employment. http://www.oecd.org/gen-der/data/employment.htm
Google Scholar
OECD Statistics. http://stats.oecd.org/
Google Scholar
Polkowska, D. (2016). Feminizacja prekariatu. Polska na tle innych krajów Europy. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 19(2), 31–49.
Google Scholar
Poławski, P. (2012). Generacja prekariuszy na polskim rynku pracy. Polityka Społeczna, 9(462), 16–23.
Google Scholar
Potter, M., & Hamilton, J. (2014). Picking on vulnerable migrants: precarity and the mushroom industry in Northern Ireland. Work, Employment and Society, 28(3), 390–406.
Google Scholar
Rodgers, G., & Rodgers, J. (Eds.) (1989). Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: The growth of atypical employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat. New dangerous class. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar
Szarfenberg, R. (2015). Prekariat – krótkie wprowadzenie [the text is part of the project of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Social Policy and the Department of Social Policy in the Local Environment of the University of Warsaw]. www.rszarf.ips.uw.edu.pl/pdf/prekariat.pdf
Google Scholar
Tarkowska, E. (2009). Oblicza polskiej biedy. Więzi, 2, 1–10.
Google Scholar
Titkow, A. (Ed.). (2003). Szklany sufit: bariery i ograniczenia karier kobiet: monografia zjawiska. Warszawa: Fundacja Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Google Scholar
Urbański, J. (2014). Prekariat i nowa walka klas: przeobrażenia współczesnej klasy pracowniczej i jej form walki. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
Google Scholar
Vij, R. (2013). Affective fields of precarity: Gendered antinomies in contemporary Japan. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(2), 122–138.
Google Scholar
Vosko, L. (2005). Precarious employment: Understanding labour market insecurity in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
Google Scholar
Woolfson, Ch., Fudge, J., & Thörnqvist, Ch. (2014). Migrant precarity and future challenges to labour standards in Sweden. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(4), 695–715. doi: 10.1177/0143831X13494249
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.