The feminisation of precarity Poland compared to other countries

Autor

  • Dominika Polkowska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (UMCS) in Lublin, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Institute of Sociology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.8.10

Słowa kluczowe:

precarity, feminisation, dual-market theory, Post-Fordism

Abstrakt

Precarity applies to people who, in order to survive, need to work in a low-quality job, which is uncertain, temporary, low-paid, with no prospect of promotion, no security and no contract. In this sense, the precariat is a category related mostly to the secondary segments of the labour market according to the concept of the dual labour market. It is also the universal feature of Post-Fordism and the modern working conditions in which women, more often than men are located in the “worst” segment of the labour market. In this context, it is worth noting that since the beginning of the era of globalisation, women have mostly worked in the sectors more uncertain and unstable e.g., in the service industries and trade. It has been feminisation in a double sense of the word: there have been more and more working women, on the one hand, and on the other hand, women have usually taken the flexible jobs. Most of these jobs are precarious work. Precarity combined with job insecurity and low wages leaves the workforce in this group unable to plan for their future or afford a decent life. This article attempts to prove that the threat of precarity is more probable for women than men. This claim is supported by the OECD and Eurostat data on precarity for Poland and other European countries.

Bibliografia

Amamiya, K. (2009). The gloom of the precariat. Tokyo: Kodansha.
Google Scholar

Amamiya, K., & Beck, J. (2010). Suffering forces us to think beyond the right-left barrier. Mechademia, 5, 251–265.
Google Scholar

Bednarski, M. (2012). Koszty i korzyści zatrudnienia na czas określony. Polityka Społeczna, 9(462), 5–8.
Google Scholar

Blicharz, J. (2014). Kilka uwag na temat ubóstwa wśród kobiet w Polsce. In J. Blicharz, L. Klat-Wertelecka, & E. Rutkowska-Tomaszewska (Eds.), Oblicza polskiej biedy (pp. 39–46). Wrocław: E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa, Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Google Scholar

Borowska, M., & Branka, M. (2010). Równość szans kobiet i mężczyzn a rynek pracy. Warszawa: Centrum Rozwoju Zasobów Ludzkich.
Google Scholar

Castel, R. (2000). The roads to disaffiliation: Insecure work and vulnerable relationships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3), 519–535.
Google Scholar

Castel, R. (2002). From manual workers to wage laborers: Transformation of the social question. New Brunswick (USA)–London: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar

Charkiewicz, E. (2010). Kobiety i ubóstwo – widzialna ręka neoliberalnego państwa. Biblioteka Online Think Tanku Feministycznego.
Google Scholar

Domański, H., & Karpiński, Z. (2012). Metodologia badań nad stratyfikacją społeczną. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar

Duell, N. (2004). Defining and assessing precarious employment in Europe: a review of main studies and surveys. Munich: ESOPE Project.
Google Scholar

Eurostat Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Google Scholar

Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2011). Caught in the work-citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalizations, 8(3), 325–341.
Google Scholar

Knapińska, M. (2014). Prekariat jako zjawisko występujące na współczesnym rynku pracy w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 2(7), 94–112.
Google Scholar

Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 2(7), 127–191.
Google Scholar

Kryńska, E. (1996). Segmentacja rynku pracy: podstawy teoretyczne i analiza statystyczna. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Kryńska, E., & Kwiatkowski, E. (2013). Podstawy wiedzy o rynku pracy. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Mrozowicki, A., Roosalu, T., & Bajuk-Sencar, T. (2013). Precarious work in the retail sector in Estonia, Poland and Slovenia: Trade union responses in a time of economic crisis. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 19(2), 267–278.
Google Scholar

OECD Employment database. http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/onlineoecdemploy mentdatabase.htm
Google Scholar

OECD Indicators of Gender Equality in Employment. http://www.oecd.org/gen-der/data/employment.htm
Google Scholar

OECD Statistics. http://stats.oecd.org/
Google Scholar

Polkowska, D. (2016). Feminizacja prekariatu. Polska na tle innych krajów Europy. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 19(2), 31–49.
Google Scholar

Poławski, P. (2012). Generacja prekariuszy na polskim rynku pracy. Polityka Społeczna, 9(462), 16–23.
Google Scholar

Potter, M., & Hamilton, J. (2014). Picking on vulnerable migrants: precarity and the mushroom industry in Northern Ireland. Work, Employment and Society, 28(3), 390–406.
Google Scholar

Rodgers, G., & Rodgers, J. (Eds.) (1989). Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: The growth of atypical employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat. New dangerous class. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar

Szarfenberg, R. (2015). Prekariat – krótkie wprowadzenie [the text is part of the project of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Social Policy and the Department of Social Policy in the Local Environment of the University of Warsaw]. www.rszarf.ips.uw.edu.pl/pdf/prekariat.pdf
Google Scholar

Tarkowska, E. (2009). Oblicza polskiej biedy. Więzi, 2, 1–10.
Google Scholar

Titkow, A. (Ed.). (2003). Szklany sufit: bariery i ograniczenia karier kobiet: monografia zjawiska. Warszawa: Fundacja Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
Google Scholar

Urbański, J. (2014). Prekariat i nowa walka klas: przeobrażenia współczesnej klasy pracowniczej i jej form walki. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
Google Scholar

Vij, R. (2013). Affective fields of precarity: Gendered antinomies in contemporary Japan. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(2), 122–138.
Google Scholar

Vosko, L. (2005). Precarious employment: Understanding labour market insecurity in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
Google Scholar

Woolfson, Ch., Fudge, J., & Thörnqvist, Ch. (2014). Migrant precarity and future challenges to labour standards in Sweden. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(4), 695–715. doi: 10.1177/0143831X13494249
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2019-03-01

Jak cytować

Polkowska, D. (2019). The feminisation of precarity Poland compared to other countries. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(8), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.8.10

Numer

Dział

Artykuł