Improving the Relationship between Welfare Economics and Ethics

Autor

  • Carmen Pagliari
  • Iacopo Odoardi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.03

Słowa kluczowe:

Welfare Economics, Methodological Individualism, Allocative Efficiency, Ethics

Abstrakt

In this essay, the essential aspects of Welfare Economics are summarized in order to analyse the possible links with Ethics, and consequently to provide useful suggestions for Economic Policy. The Introduction contains the principles of neoclassical Welfare Economics, without considering the circumstances in which the so‑called failures of competitive markets occur. The second part of this paper contains a description of two possible solutions to the problem concerning the integration of Welfare Economics and Ethics. The first solution is the determination of the optimal combination of general competitive equilibrium principles and social ethics ones, without removing the theoretical structure of Welfare Economics. This first proposal, while retaining some economic liberalism principles, assigns a central role to the government, which is delegated to superimpose on the Pareto criterion a distributive justice rule. Another solution, which is suggested by Sen, is essentially directed to modify Welfare Economics by ethical criteria aimed at improving every individual deprivation, and it is based on the distinction between the two concepts of ‘utility’ and ‘agency’. We also proposed exploiting the original considerations written by Smith about social aspects as a useful integration and support to Sen’s approach.

Bibliografia

Beckerman W., The Role of Welfare Economics [in:] Economics as Applied Ethics, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2017.
Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner M., Equality and Equity, “Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 1973, Vol. 409, pp. 9–23.
Google Scholar

Costabile L., Amartya Sen e le questioni di genere, “Testimonianze” 2004, Vol. 433, pp. 11–23.
Google Scholar

Crawford V.P., A Procedure for Generating Pareto‑Efficient Egalitarian‑Equivalent Allocations, “Econometrica” 1979, Vol. 47, pp. 49–60.
Google Scholar

De Stefanis S., V. Sena, Health, Capabilities and Functionings: An Empirical Analysis for the UK, Working Paper, No. 151, 2006, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance – University of Salerno (Italy).
Google Scholar

Duclos J.Y., Innis Lecture: Equity and Equality, “The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique” 2006, Vol. 39, pp. 1073–1104.
Google Scholar

Grasso M., A Dynamic Operationalization of Sen’s Capability Approach, Working Paper Series, No. 59, 2002, Dip. of Political Economics, University of Milan – Bicocca (Italy).
Google Scholar

Hicks J.R., The Foundations of Welfare Economics, “The Economic Journal” 1939, Vol. 49, pp. 696–712.
Google Scholar

Impicciatore G., Introduzione alla moderna microeconomia, ed. CEDAM, Padova 2006.
Google Scholar

Krishnakumar J., P. Ballon, Estimating Basic Capabilities: A Structural Equation Model Applied to Bolivia, “World Development” 2008, Vol. 36, pp. 992–1010.
Google Scholar

Lucas Jr. R.E., On the Mechanics of Economic Development, “Journal of Monetary Economics” 1988, Vol. 22, pp. 3–42.
Google Scholar

Mas‑Colell A., M.D. Whinston, J.R. Green, Microeconomic theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996.
Google Scholar

Mattoscio N., C. Pagliari, Equilibri economici non cooperativi e teoria dei giochi, ed. CEDAM, Padova 1990.
Google Scholar

McGregor J.A., N. Pouw, Towards an Economics of Well‑being, “Cambridge Journal of Economics” 2016, Vol. 41, pp. 1123–1142.
Google Scholar

Quirk J., R. Saposnik, Introduction to General Equilibrium and Welfare Economics, McGraw‑Hill, New York 1968.
Google Scholar

Robeyns I., Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement, “Social Indicators Research” 2005, Vol. 74, pp. 191–215.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, San Francisco 1970.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., On Ethics and Economics, Blackwell, London 1988.
Google Scholar

Sitarz S., Pareto Optimal Allocations and Dynamic Programming, “Annals of Operations Research” 2009, Vol. 172, pp. 203–219.
Google Scholar

Smith A., An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Edwin Cannan, New York 1776.
Google Scholar

Smith A., Essay on Philosophical Subjects, T. Cadell Jun. and W. Davies, London 1795.
Google Scholar

Smith A., Lectures on Jurisprudence [in:] Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. V, eds. R.L. Meek, D.D. Raphael, P.G. Stein, Oxford Univesity Press,Oxford 1978[1763].
Google Scholar

Smith A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, A. Millar, London 1759.
Google Scholar

Walsh V., H. Gram, Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium: Historical Origins and Mathematical Structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1980.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2018-02-19

Jak cytować

Pagliari, C., & Odoardi, I. (2018). Improving the Relationship between Welfare Economics and Ethics. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 20(4), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.03

Numer

Dział

Artykuł