The Changing Face of Economics? Ethical Issues in Contemporary Economic Schools as a Consequence of Changes in the Concept of Human Nature

Anna Horodecka

doi:10.18778/1899-2226.18.4.04

Autor

Anna Horodecka Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.18.4.04

Słowa kluczowe:

business ethics, heterodox economic schools, economic anthropology, concept of human nature

Abstrakt

The last financial crisis combined with some recent social trends (like growing inequality or environmental problems) inspired many contemporary economists to the re-evaluation of actual economic knowledge in the search for solutions to these problems. Modern economic schools (especially heterodox ones) stress the meaning of ethical issues in economics more often. The thesis of the paper is that this revival of the ethical face of present economics depends very strongly on the changing assumptions of human nature within economics and other disciplines which work alongside economics, such as social psychology or business ethics, for instance. In order to prove the thesis, the paper provides an evaluation of current economic schools, especially within the heterodoxy, in search of their ethical aspects, and presents them as a result of the changing assumptions about human beings within those schools. This ethical dimension of human beings manifests itself in different ways, which can be perceived as a result of it being based on different ethical schools and different psychological and philosophical assumptions about human nature. Therefore, the paper also considers the current developments of the view on human beings in contemporary schools of economic ethics.

Bibliografia

Apel K.-O., Das Apriori der kommunikationsgemeinschaft, Suhrkamp, 1976.
Google Scholar

Apel K.-O., Globalization and the need for universal ethics, “European Journal of Social Theory” 2000, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 137–155.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310022224732

Apel K.-O., Grenzen der Diskursethik? Versuch einer Zwischenbilanz, “Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung” 1986, pp. 3–31.
Google Scholar

Apel K.-O., The situation of humanity as an ethical problem, “Praxis International” 1984, No. 3, pp. 250–265.
Google Scholar

Beaudreau B.C., A humanistic theory of economic behavior, “The Journal of Socio-Economics” 2012, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 222–234.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.002

Becker C., The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives, “Ecological economics” 2006, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 17–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.016

Becker G.S., The economic approach to human behavior [in:] The Economics Approach to Human Behavior, ed. G.S. Becker, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1976, pp. 3–14.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001

Bentham J., J.S. Mill, The utilitarians, Anchor Press, Garden City, NY 1973.
Google Scholar

Boulding K., Evolutionary Economics, Sage, London 1981.
Google Scholar

Boulding K.E., What is evolutionary economics?, “Journal of Evolutionary Economics” 1991, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 9–17.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01202334

Bowie N.E., A Kantian Theory of Meaningful Work, “Journal of Business Ethics” 1998, Vol. 17, pp. 1083–1092.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006023500585

Camerer C.F., G. Loewenstein, Behavioral economics: Past, present, future [in:] Advances in behavioral economics, ed. C.F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2004, pp. 3–53.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118-004

Charuseela S., Social Analysis and the Capabilities Approach: A Limit to Martha Nussbaum’s Universalist Ethics, “Cambridge Journal of Economics” 2009, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1135–1152.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben027

Collins D., Essentials of business ethics: Creating an organization of high integrity and superior performance, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118386163

Daly H.E., J. Farley, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Island Press, Washington, DC 2010.
Google Scholar

Dopfer K., J. Potts, On the Theory of Economic Evolution, “Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review” 2009, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23–44.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.6.23

Dzionek-Kozłowska J., Ekonomia jako nauka pozytywna. Refleksje na marginesie „Ekonomii dobra i zła” Tomáša Sedláčka, “Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym”, Vol. 16, pp. 335–344.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.16.24

Dzionek-Kozlowska J., R. Matera, Ethics in Economic Thought. Selected Issues and Various Perspectives, Lodz University Press, Jagiellonian University Press, Lodz-Cracow 2015, pp. 81–89.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-687-1

Eisenhardt K., Agency theory: An assessment and review, “Academy of Management Review” 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57–74.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Etzioni A., The Essential Communitarian Reader, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 1998.
Google Scholar

Etzioni A., Toward a Kantian Socio-Economics, “Review of Social Economy” 1987, Vol. 45, No. 1.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346768700000003

Etzioni A.X., Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics, Simon and Schuster, 2010.
Google Scholar

Faber M., R. Manstetten, J. Proops, Ecological Economics. Concepts and Methods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 1996.
Google Scholar

Ferber M.A., J.A. Nelson, Beyond economic man: feminist theory and economics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1993.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226242088.001.0001

Habermas J., Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2001.
Google Scholar

Habermas J., Philosophische Anthropologie, [in:] Kultur und Kritik, ed. J. Habermas, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1973.
Google Scholar

Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Beacon Press, 1987.
Google Scholar

Hamilton D.B., Evolutionary economics: A study of change in economic thought, Transaction Publ., New Brunswick, NJ 1991.
Google Scholar

Herman A., Dokąd zmierza ekonomia?, “Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie” 2008, No. 2, pp. 4–13.
Google Scholar

Hewitson G., Feminist economics as a Postmodern Moment, “Review of Social Economy” 2007, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 187–193.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760701345508

Hodgson G.M., From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities, An Evolutionary Economics without Homo economicus, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2012.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922737.001.0001

Höffe O., Humanität [in:] Lexikon der Ethik, ed. O. Höffe, München 1980, pp. 112–113.
Google Scholar

Homann K., F. Blome-Drees, Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1992.
Google Scholar

Horodecka A., E. Mazur-Wierzbicka, The meaning of the concept of human nature in the organization and ethical concepts supporting CSR, [in:] CSR – Społeczny wymiar działalności biznesowej, ed. E. Mazur-Wierzbicka, Economicus, Szczecin 2014.
Google Scholar

Horodecka A., Homo oeconomicus, jako podstawa ekonomii – krytyka i alternatywy [Homo economicus, as the basis of economics – criticism and alternatives], “Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu” 2014, No. 347, pp. 166–183.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.347.16

Horodecka A., Komponenty obrazu człowieka w ekonomii [Components of the concept of human nature in economics]. “Kwartalnik Historii Myśli Ekonomicznej [Quarterly History of Economic Thought]” 2014, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 117–139.
Google Scholar

Horodecka A., Rola obrazów człowieka w koncepcjach zarządzania z uwzględnieniem aspektów metodologicznych [The role of human images in the concepts of management, taking into account methodological aspects], [in:] Studia Ekonomiczne Nauki o zarządzaniu – u początków i współcześnie, ed. A. Czech, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, Katowice 2012, pp. 443–464.
Google Scholar

Horodecka A., Światowe religie wobec współczesnych wyzwań rozwojowych [The response of world religions to today's development challenges], [in:] J. Stacewicz, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Warsaw 2015.
Google Scholar

Horodecka A., The goal and field of evolutionary and neoclassical economics as a consequence of the changes in concepts of human nature, 15th EBES Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, January 8–10, 2015.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/11

Horodecka A., The Meaning of Concepts of Human Nature in Organizational Life in Business Ethical Context, “Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym / Annales. Ethics in Economic Life” 2014, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 53–64.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.04

Kahneman D., A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, “Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society” 1979, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 263–291.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kahneman D., Thinking, fast and slow, Macmillan, 2011.
Google Scholar

Karmasin M., M. Litschka, Wirtschaftsethik: Theorien, Strategien, Trends, Lit-Verl., Wien 2008.
Google Scholar

Klimczak B., Model człowieka gospodarującego we współczesnej ekonomii [in:] Wizerunek współczesnego człowieka gospodarującego, ed. A. Węgrzycki, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Krakowie, Cracow 2000, pp. 11–29.
Google Scholar

Kołodko G.W., Dokąd zmierza świat. Ekonomia polityczna przyszłości, Prószyński i S-ka, Warsaw 2013.
Google Scholar

Kołodko G.W., Wędrujący świat, Prószyński i S-ka, Warsaw 2008.
Google Scholar

Lin N., Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
Google Scholar

Lutz M.A., K. Lux, Humanistic economics: the new challenge, Bootstrap Press, New York, NY 1988.
Google Scholar

Lutz M.A.X., Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Economic Thought in the Humanist Tradition, Routledge, 2002.
Google Scholar

Nelson J., Feminist Economics at the Millennium: A Personal Perspective, “Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society” 2000, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 1177–1181.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/495541

Nelson J.A., Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics, “Ecological economics” 2008, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 441–447.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.001

Nussbaum M.C., Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and Social Justice, “Feminist Economics" 2003, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 33–59.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926

Pelenc J., M.K. Lompo, J. Ballet, J.-L. Dubois, Sustainable human development and the capability approach: Integrating environment, responsibility and collective agency, “Journal of Human Development and Capabilities” 2013, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 77–94.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747491

Pieper A., Einfü hrung in die Ethik [in:] Mut zum Aufbruch. Eine wirtschaftspolitische Agenda fü r die Schweiz, ed. D. Hauser, H.B. Schmid, Zu ̈ rich 1995.
Google Scholar

Rich A., Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagen in theologischer Perspektive, Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Gütersloh 1984.
Google Scholar

Sedláček T., Ekonomia dobra i zła, Wydawnictwo EMKA, Warsaw 2012.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., Commodities and Capabilities, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1985.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., Development as freedom, Univ. Press, Oxford 2001.
Google Scholar

Sen A.K., Inequality Reexamined, Russell Sage, New York 1992.
Google Scholar

Stacewicz J., Etyczne przesłanki działania gospodarczego, “Problemy” 1988, No. 4, pp. 1–5.
Google Scholar

Ulrich P., Integrative Economic Ethics: Foundations of a Civilized Market Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488658

Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie, Haupt, Bern 2001.
Google Scholar

Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik: Grundlagenreflexion der ökonomischen Vernunft, "Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften” 2000, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 555–567.
Google Scholar

Ulrich P., Integrative Wirtschaftsethik—eine Heuristik auch für die Technikethik? [in:] Technikethik und Wirtschaftsethik, Springer, 1998, pp. 53–74.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97402-0_3

Wieland J., Corporate governance, values management, and standards: an European perspective, “Business & Society” 2005, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 74–93.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305274852

Wieland J., Die Ethik der Governance, Metropolis-Verl., Marburg 2004.
Google Scholar

Wieland J., Eine Theorie der Governanceethik, “Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik” 2001, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 8–33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/1439-880X-2001-1-8

Wieland J., Governance ethics: Global value creation, economic organization and normatively, Springer, 2014.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07923-3

http://go.worldbank.org/K4LUMW43B0
Google Scholar

http://go.worldbank.org/XR8TFW7L20
Google Scholar