The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Valuable Benchmark in the Regulation of Economic Relations

Autor

  • Virginija Kondratienė Kazimieras Simonavičius University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.05

Słowa kluczowe:

the principle of subsidiarity, state governance, regulation of economic systems, the concept of social rule-of-law state

Abstrakt

The principle of subsidiarity can be an effective tool for adjusting economic systems and establishing the social rule-of-law concept in public organisation. In considering the usability of the principle of subsidiarity, the following aspects thereof are discussed: the role in the development of the European social model; employment in determining limits for the powers of the public and private sectors; the application in the market and planned economy systems; and the social justice function in the development of a social welfare state. The principle of subsidiarity as an instrument for individuals’ interests, balancing and adjusting in the regulation of economic systems, helps to establish the relative sizes of public policy and the market, as subsidiarity can help ensure a more equitable distribution of public goods while guaranteeing the maintenance of the creative potency of operators and minimal satisfaction of vital needs of individuals unable to contribute to the production of goods. It amounts to a constitutional measure determining the balance of productive and protective state, thus ensuring the stability of the state organisation. In the concept of a social rule-of-law state, subsidiarity draws clear limits to the state’s powers, institutionally bringing together efforts of all members of the community to achieve welfare in the state.

Bibliografia

Alekseev O., Shhedrovickij, Prakticheskaja subsidiarnost, “Kazanskij federalist” 2002, No. 4, http://www.kaza-nfed.ru/publications/kazanfederalist/n4/stat3/.
Google Scholar

Bolshakov S.N., Princip subsidiarnosti v sovremennom demokraticheskom upravlenii: konceptualnye podkhody i problemy prakticheskoj realizacini [The Principle of Subsidiarity in Modern Democratic Government: Conceptual Approaches and Problems of Practical Implementation] dissertation of the doctor of political sciences: 23.00.02 SPb., 2006, p. 372 RGB OD, 71:07-23/15, 2006, p. 10, www.lib.ua-ru.net/diss/cont/188411.html
Google Scholar

Dolan Eh., D. Lindsej, Mikroekonomika, SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgorkestr 1994.
Google Scholar

Domas Cesevičius, compiled by V. Lukoševičius and M. Treinys, Vilnius 1998.
Google Scholar

Eucken W., Osnovy nacionalnoj ekonomii. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, Valag Helmut Kupper, Godesberg, 1947; Thesis, Vesna 93, vol. 1.
Google Scholar

Grier S.L., Recept vseobshhego blagosostojanija [Recipe for General Welfare], “Russkie chtenija”, Ed. 1, Collection of materials of the programme of the Institute for Public Projects. М.: «Gruppa Ehkspert», 2006, pp. 27-28.
Google Scholar

Hosper J., Kas yra libertarizmas? Laisvoji rinka: skaitiniai, Lietuvos verslininkų sąjunga, Kaunas 1992.
Google Scholar

Iljin V.V., А. Akhiezer, Rossijskaja civilizacija: Soderzhanie, granicy, vozmozhnosti [Russian Civilization: Content, Limits, Possibilities],М.: MGU, 2000, pp. 31-33.
Google Scholar

Jokubaitis A., Liberalizmo tapatumo problema. “Politologija”, 1999/1 (13), p. 12.
Google Scholar

Kelsen H., Grynoji teisės teorija, Eugrimas, Vilnius 2002.
Google Scholar

Kirdina S.G., Institucionalnye matricy i razvitie Rossii [Institutional Matrices and Development of Russia], TEZIS, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar

Lane J.E., Viešasis sektorius: sąvokos, modeliai ir požiūria, Margi raštai, Vilnius 2001.
Google Scholar

Merkel A., Europos vertybės globaliame pasaulyje, Naujasis židinys-Aidai 2006/1-2, p. 43.
Google Scholar

Nozick R., Anarchija, valstybė, utopija. Socialinio teisingumo miražas, Eugrimas, Vilnius, 1998.
Google Scholar

O’Brien D.J., J.Coleman, One Hundred Years of Catholic Social Thought, New York 1991.
Google Scholar

Rakauskienė O.G., et al., Lietuvos ūkio plėtojimo ilgalaikė strategija iki 2015 metų. Organizacijų vadyba, Sisteminiai tyrimai, Vilnius 2001, No. 19.
Google Scholar

Rawls J., Teorija spravedlivosti [Theory of Justice], Izdatelstvo Novgorodskogo Universiteta, Novosibirsk 1995.
Google Scholar

Schumacher E.F., Small is Beautiful, A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, London, 1973.
Google Scholar

Šiaudvytienė E., Europos Sąjungos subsidiarumo principo paradoksai. (I) Vilnius: VšĮ “Bernardinai.lt” 2009, http://www.bernardinai.lt/straipsnis/2009-01-29-elena-siaudvytiene-europos-sajungos-subsidiarumo-principo-paradoksai-ii/3358#form, http://www.osjspm.org/majordoc_justicia_in_mundo_offical_test.aspx
Google Scholar

Sloan A., My Years with General Motors, Garden City, Doubleday, New York 1964.
Google Scholar

Terin D.F., ‘Zapad’ i ‘Vostok’ v institucionalnom podkhode k civilizacini [West and East in Institutional Approach to Civilization], “Sociologicheskij zhurnal” http://www.nir.ru/Socio/-scipubl/sj/sj4-01ter.html 2001.
Google Scholar

The Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 2000, No. 74-2262.
Google Scholar

Verkhan P.H., Predprinimatel. Ego ehkonomicheskaja funkcija i obshhestvennopoliticheskaja otvetstvennost [An Entrepreneur. Its Economic Function and Social and Political Responsibility], Eridan, Minsk 1992.
Google Scholar

White Paper on Services of General Interest.COM(2004) 374, 2004, p. 6, eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/lt/.../2004/com2004_0374lt01.pdf
Google Scholar

Wonnacott P., R. Wonnacott, Makroekonomika, Littera Universitati Vytauti Magni, Vilnius 1994.
Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2014-12-01

Jak cytować

Kondratienė, V. (2014). The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Valuable Benchmark in the Regulation of Economic Relations. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 17(4), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.05

Numer

Dział

Artykuł