The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Valuable Benchmark in the Regulation of Economic Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.05Słowa kluczowe:
the principle of subsidiarity, state governance, regulation of economic systems, the concept of social rule-of-law stateAbstrakt
The principle of subsidiarity can be an effective tool for adjusting economic systems and establishing the social rule-of-law concept in public organisation. In considering the usability of the principle of subsidiarity, the following aspects thereof are discussed: the role in the development of the European social model; employment in determining limits for the powers of the public and private sectors; the application in the market and planned economy systems; and the social justice function in the development of a social welfare state. The principle of subsidiarity as an instrument for individuals’ interests, balancing and adjusting in the regulation of economic systems, helps to establish the relative sizes of public policy and the market, as subsidiarity can help ensure a more equitable distribution of public goods while guaranteeing the maintenance of the creative potency of operators and minimal satisfaction of vital needs of individuals unable to contribute to the production of goods. It amounts to a constitutional measure determining the balance of productive and protective state, thus ensuring the stability of the state organisation. In the concept of a social rule-of-law state, subsidiarity draws clear limits to the state’s powers, institutionally bringing together efforts of all members of the community to achieve welfare in the state.Bibliografia
Alekseev O., Shhedrovickij, Prakticheskaja subsidiarnost, “Kazanskij federalist” 2002, No. 4, http://www.kaza-nfed.ru/publications/kazanfederalist/n4/stat3/.
Google Scholar
Bolshakov S.N., Princip subsidiarnosti v sovremennom demokraticheskom upravlenii: konceptualnye podkhody i problemy prakticheskoj realizacini [The Principle of Subsidiarity in Modern Democratic Government: Conceptual Approaches and Problems of Practical Implementation] dissertation of the doctor of political sciences: 23.00.02 SPb., 2006, p. 372 RGB OD, 71:07-23/15, 2006, p. 10, www.lib.ua-ru.net/diss/cont/188411.html
Google Scholar
Dolan Eh., D. Lindsej, Mikroekonomika, SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgorkestr 1994.
Google Scholar
Domas Cesevičius, compiled by V. Lukoševičius and M. Treinys, Vilnius 1998.
Google Scholar
Eucken W., Osnovy nacionalnoj ekonomii. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, Valag Helmut Kupper, Godesberg, 1947; Thesis, Vesna 93, vol. 1.
Google Scholar
Grier S.L., Recept vseobshhego blagosostojanija [Recipe for General Welfare], “Russkie chtenija”, Ed. 1, Collection of materials of the programme of the Institute for Public Projects. М.: «Gruppa Ehkspert», 2006, pp. 27-28.
Google Scholar
Hosper J., Kas yra libertarizmas? Laisvoji rinka: skaitiniai, Lietuvos verslininkų sąjunga, Kaunas 1992.
Google Scholar
Iljin V.V., А. Akhiezer, Rossijskaja civilizacija: Soderzhanie, granicy, vozmozhnosti [Russian Civilization: Content, Limits, Possibilities],М.: MGU, 2000, pp. 31-33.
Google Scholar
Jokubaitis A., Liberalizmo tapatumo problema. “Politologija”, 1999/1 (13), p. 12.
Google Scholar
Kelsen H., Grynoji teisės teorija, Eugrimas, Vilnius 2002.
Google Scholar
Kirdina S.G., Institucionalnye matricy i razvitie Rossii [Institutional Matrices and Development of Russia], TEZIS, Moskva 2000.
Google Scholar
Lane J.E., Viešasis sektorius: sąvokos, modeliai ir požiūria, Margi raštai, Vilnius 2001.
Google Scholar
Merkel A., Europos vertybės globaliame pasaulyje, Naujasis židinys-Aidai 2006/1-2, p. 43.
Google Scholar
Nozick R., Anarchija, valstybė, utopija. Socialinio teisingumo miražas, Eugrimas, Vilnius, 1998.
Google Scholar
O’Brien D.J., J.Coleman, One Hundred Years of Catholic Social Thought, New York 1991.
Google Scholar
Rakauskienė O.G., et al., Lietuvos ūkio plėtojimo ilgalaikė strategija iki 2015 metų. Organizacijų vadyba, Sisteminiai tyrimai, Vilnius 2001, No. 19.
Google Scholar
Rawls J., Teorija spravedlivosti [Theory of Justice], Izdatelstvo Novgorodskogo Universiteta, Novosibirsk 1995.
Google Scholar
Schumacher E.F., Small is Beautiful, A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, London, 1973.
Google Scholar
Šiaudvytienė E., Europos Sąjungos subsidiarumo principo paradoksai. (I) Vilnius: VšĮ “Bernardinai.lt” 2009, http://www.bernardinai.lt/straipsnis/2009-01-29-elena-siaudvytiene-europos-sajungos-subsidiarumo-principo-paradoksai-ii/3358#form, http://www.osjspm.org/majordoc_justicia_in_mundo_offical_test.aspx
Google Scholar
Sloan A., My Years with General Motors, Garden City, Doubleday, New York 1964.
Google Scholar
Terin D.F., ‘Zapad’ i ‘Vostok’ v institucionalnom podkhode k civilizacini [West and East in Institutional Approach to Civilization], “Sociologicheskij zhurnal” http://www.nir.ru/Socio/-scipubl/sj/sj4-01ter.html 2001.
Google Scholar
The Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania, Official Gazette 2000, No. 74-2262.
Google Scholar
Verkhan P.H., Predprinimatel. Ego ehkonomicheskaja funkcija i obshhestvennopoliticheskaja otvetstvennost [An Entrepreneur. Its Economic Function and Social and Political Responsibility], Eridan, Minsk 1992.
Google Scholar
White Paper on Services of General Interest.COM(2004) 374, 2004, p. 6, eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/lt/.../2004/com2004_0374lt01.pdf
Google Scholar
Wonnacott P., R. Wonnacott, Makroekonomika, Littera Universitati Vytauti Magni, Vilnius 1994.
Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.