Family Life – between Charism and Institution. Signalling Multidimensionality and Complexity of Human Interactions for Business Institutions and Society

Michał Michalski

doi:10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.03

Autor

Michał Michalski Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Cultural Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.17.4.03

Słowa kluczowe:

family, charism, institution, business, social interactions

Abstrakt

This paper analyses the complexity of family life, which includes both its charismatic and institutional aspects. Deepening the understanding of this basic social group can be useful in explaining how human beings in their decisions and actions, as well as organizations, unceasingly transcend different oppositions and dimensions. Undertaking this topic is not only important in the context of understanding the fundamental and complex experience of family life in the process of preparing and introducing new members to society, but also from the organizational perspective. It means that exploring the role of both dimensions – charismatic and institutional – which are somehow complementary, is crucial for understanding and harmonizing the different relationships and interactions within organizations, including business ones. In this way the article shows the connection between the functioning of the family and society (including organizations within it).

Bibliografia

Adamski F., Rodzina. Wymiar społeczno-kulturowy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Cracow 2002.
Google Scholar

Andringa L., Chrześcijanin a pieniądze, Zjazd Gnieźnieński, Gniezno 2004, http://www.zjazd.eu/teksty/24.html
Google Scholar

Arrow K.J., Granice organizacji [The Limits of Organization], translated by A. Ehrlich, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw 1985.
Google Scholar

Bea Augustin Cardinal, Unity in Freedom. Reflections on the Human Family, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1964.
Google Scholar

Coser L.A., Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York 1977, p. 307-310, quoted after: http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/DSS/Cooley/COOLW3.HTML
Google Scholar

John Paul II, Christifideles Laici, 30th December 1988.
Google Scholar

John Paul II, Gaudium et Spes.
Google Scholar

John Paul II, Letter to Families.
Google Scholar

John Paul II, Speech of the Holy Father Pope John Paul II, Meeting with Ecclesial Movements and New Communities, 30 May 1998, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1998/may/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19980530_riflessioni_en.html
Google Scholar

MacIver R.M., C.H. Page, The Mark of a Community is That One’s Life May Be Lived Wholly Within It, (Excerpts from R.M. MacIver and Ch. Page, Society: An Introductory Analysis, Macmillan Co., 1961, pp. 8-10, [in:] P. Worsley, Modern Sociology, Penguin Education, 1970.
Google Scholar

McConnell D.W., Economic Behavior, Houghton Mifflin, Boston 1939, quoted after: T. Abel, Podstawy teorii socjologicznej, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw 1977.
Google Scholar

O’Donnell J. SJ, Klucz do teologii Hansa Ursa von Balthasara (Hans Urs von Balthasar), translated by A. Wałęcki, Wydawnictwo WAM, Cracow 2005.
Google Scholar

Ruman E., Biznes i chrześcijaństwo potrzebują gwałtowników. Interview with Fr. Jacek Stryczek , “Fronda” 2009, No. 52, p. 96-110.
Google Scholar

Tayeb M.H., The Management of a Multicultural Workforce, J. Wiley & Sons, New York Toronto Brisbane Singapore 1996.
Google Scholar

Tönnies F., The Contrast between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (Excerpts from Ferdinand Tönnies, Community and Association, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1955, pp. 37- 9) [in:] P. Worsley, Modern Sociology, Penguin Education, 1970.
Google Scholar

Weber M., Economy and Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 1978.
Google Scholar

http://catholicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/03/another-guest-blog.html
Google Scholar