The Protection of Intellectual Property in Relations Between Entrepreneurs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.19

Keywords:

intellectual property, employee, entrepreneur, author’s economic rights, protection against unfair competition

Abstract

The Deputies’ bill amending the Labor Code and the Entrepreneurs’ Law provides for the extension of the legal definition of an employee to entities performing their duties personally for remuneration, permanently for the same entity, for a period of not less than 6 months. The proposed modification of the aforementioned definition will cause some changes not only in the field of regulations regarding employee rights, but also in the protection of intangible assets, such as intellectual property. In particular, the certain modifications will be visible in the way of copyright protection and fair competition between entrepreneurs. Even the inalienable nature of moral rights will not protect this sphere of the author’s rights from some transformations in the field of protection. The aim of the article is therefore to trace the current legal status, mainly based on the analysis of selected normative acts regarding labor law as well as intellectual property law and to try to answer the question of which legal status – current or postulated after the entry into force of the thematic amendment – would be more favorable in terms of protection of intangible assets that are part of the enterprise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barta, Janusz. Ryszard Markiewicz. 2016. Prawo autorskie. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Ferenc-Szydełko, Ewa. 2016. „Komentarz do art. 12”. In Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Komentarz. 156–157. Ed. by Ewa Ferenc-Szydełko. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Ferenc-Szydełko, Ewa. 2021. „Komentarz do art. 16”. In Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Komentarz. 110–115. Ed. by Ewa Ferenc-Szydełko. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Florek, Ludwik. Łukasz Pisarczyk. 2021. Prawo pracy. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Golat, Rafał. 2018. Prawo autorskie i prawa pokrewne. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Kępiński, Marian. 2017. „Komentarz do art. 65”. In System Prawa Prywatnego. Vol. 13: Prawo autorskie. 704–706. Ed. by Janusz Barta. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Maniewska, Eliza. Kazimierz Jaskowski. Eds. 2021. Kodeks pracy. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Michniewicz, Grzegorz. 2012. Ochrona własności intelektualnej. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Michniewicz, Grzegorz. 2019. Ochrona własności intelektualnej. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Osajda, Konrad. Łukasz Żelichowski. 2021. Prawo własności przemysłowej. Komentarz. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Ożegalska-Trybalska, Justyna. 2020. „Komentarz do art. 12”. In Komentarz do Ustawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Ustawy autorskie. Komentarze. Vol. 1. Ed. by Ryszard Markiewicz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Pochopień-Belka, Sabina. 2021. Pracownicze czyny nieuczciwej konkurencji. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.33226/0032-6186.2021.2.4

Poźniak-Niedzielska, Maria. Jerzy Szczotka. 2016. Prawo autorskie. Zarys problematyki. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Pyziak-Szafnicka, Małgorzata. 2012. In System Prawa Prywatnego. Vol. 1: Prawo cywilne – część ogólna. 780–783. Ed. by Marek Safjan. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Radwański, Zbigniew. Adam Olejniczak. 2019. Prawo cywilne – część ogólna. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Google Scholar

Sieńczyło-Chlabicz. Joanna. 2021. Prawo własności intelektualnej. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Google Scholar

The Act of the 23 April 1964 – the Civil Code (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1740, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 17 November 1964 the Code of Civil Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2022, item 1967, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 26 June 1974 the Labor Code (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1320, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 16 April 1993 on Combating Unfair Competition (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1913, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1231, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 10 October 2002 on the Minimum Wage (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 2177, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Act of 16 February 2007 on Competition and Consumer Protection (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1076, as amended).
Google Scholar

The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Official Journal of the European Union of 2008, item 177.6, as amended).
Google Scholar

Judgment of 5 September 1997, Supreme Court, IPKN 223/97, https://dokumenty.e-prawnik.pl/orzecznictwo/sad-najwyzszy/izba-pracy/3ipkn97223.html (accessed: 5.09.1997).
Google Scholar

Judgment of 17 October 2017, Supreme Court, II PK 278/16 https://inforfk.pl/katalogi/artykuly/tresc,k0305,or,OSN.2017.001.002035254,Wyrok-SN-z-dnia-17-pazdziernika-2017-r-sygn-II-PK-278–16.html?pozycja=2&str=64&sort=dzd&order=d (accessed: 20.12.2017).
Google Scholar

Kodeks pracy – zmiana definicji pracownika, https://kadry.infor.pl/kodeks-pracy/przepisy-ogolne/5276780,Kodeks-pracy-zmiana-definicji-pracownika.html (accessed: 12.06.2021).
Google Scholar

Zobowiązanie do niewykonywania praw autorskich, https://legalnitworcy.pl/zobowiazanie-do-niewykonywania-praw-autorskich/#:~:text=Zobowi%C4%85zanie%20do%20niewykonywania%20praw%20autorski (accessed: 2.08.2019).
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Rzęsa, H. (2022). The Protection of Intellectual Property in Relations Between Entrepreneurs. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 101, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.101.19