Use of ICT Systems in Handling Monetary Civil Claims in Poland and England (United Kingdom): A Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.105.03Keywords:
civil procedure, comparative law, English law, ICT systemAbstract
The article aims to compare how ICT systems are used in handling monetary civil claims in Poland and England through an analysis of both legal and technical regulations and limitations. This objective is achieved through critical analysis of existing literature together with the official documentation available for both systems, as well as direct inspection of the systems. As a result of said analysis, it is apparent that the system utilised in England, despite being significantly older than the Polish system, has much more technical limitations, although they are also clearly specified in the relevant law. On the other hand, some such limitations in the Polish system are not present anywhere in statute law. Nevertheless, both systems seem to be mainly designed for handling smaller claims and reducing the amount of mainly administrative labour that was usually done manually by the court staff. In conclusion, some de lege ferenda propositions and future suggestions were formulated for both systems arising chiefly from the results of the comparative analysis.
Downloads
References
Bodio, Joanna. 2017. “Pisma procesowe w elektronicznym postępowaniu upominawczym.” In Elektroniczne postępowanie upominawcze: doświadczenia i perspektywy. Edited by Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Andrzej Jakubecki, Joanna Misztal-Konecka. 9–36. Lublin: Episteme.
Cortés, Pablo. Toru Takagi. 2019. “The Civil Money Claims Online: The Flagship Project of Court Digitalization in England and Wales.” Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 25(8): 207–212.
Fik, Piotr. 2014. “Art. 50529a k.p.c. na tle nowelizacji z 10 maja 2013 r. – uwag kilka.” Przegląd Sądowy 5: 123–128.
Goździaszek, Łukasz. 2017. “Perspektywy pełnego zautomatyzowania elektronicznego postępowania upominawczego.” In E-obywatel, e-sprawiedliwość, e-usługi. Edited by Kinga Flaga-Gieruszyńska, Jacek Gołaczyński, Dariusz Szostek. 223–233. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Hasińska, Izabela. Feliks Zedler. 2019. “Wybrane zagadnienia egzekucji ze wspólnego majątku wspólników spółki cywilnej.” Przegląd Prawa Handlowego 5: 13–19.
Kallinikos, Jannis. 2009. “Institutional Complexity and Functional Simplification: The Case of Money Claim Online Service in England and Wales.” In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector: European Studies in the Making of E-Government. Edited by Francesco Contini, Giovan Francesco Lanzara. 174–210. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227293_8
Knoppek, Krzysztof. 2014. “Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 20 stycznia 2012 r., I CSK 373/11.” Palestra 1–2: 168–171.
Lublin–Zachód District Court in Lublin. 2022. “Statistics on civil, employment and commercial cases in the electronic order for payment proceedings for the year 2021.” https://www.lublin-zachod.sr.gov.pl/download/s01e20214.pdf (accessed: 19.01.2022).
Lupo, Giampiero. 2013. “The Case of Money Claim Online and Possession Claim Online in England and Wales.” In Building Interoperability for European Civil Proceedings. Edited by Francesco Contini, and Giovan Francesco Lanzara. 111–160. Bologna: CLUEB.
Marciniak, Andrzej. 2020. “Postępowanie upominawcze: wprowadzenie.” In Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz do art. 425–729. Edited by Andrzej Marciniak. 459–461. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom. 2022. “Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly.” Last modified 3 March 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/civil-justice-statistics-quarterly (accessed: 23.10.2023).
Ryder, Ernest. 2016. “The Modernisation of Access to Justice in Times of Austerity.” 5th Annual Ryder Lecture, University of Bolton, 7 March 2016. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/20160303-ryder-lecture2.pdf (accessed: 23.10.2023).
Segit, Dariusz. Piotr Telusiewicz. 2013. “Możliwości usprawnienia współpracy e-sądu z powodami masowymi – uwagi na tle doświadczeń praktycznych.” Monitor Prawniczy 6: 326–331.
Tchórzewski, Mariusz. Przemysław Telenga. 2010. Elektroniczne postępowanie upominawcze. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
United Nations. n.d. “E-Government.” United Nations E-government Knowledgebase. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Overview (accessed: 23.10.2023).
Wójcik-Krokowska, Natalia. 2018. “Sprzeciw od nakazu zapłaty w postępowaniu upominawczym oraz w elektronicznym postępowaniu upominawczym.” Monitor Prawniczy 5: 267–273.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-02-15 (2)
- 2023-12-22 (1)
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
