Better Migrants, Worse Migrants: Young, Educated Poles Look at New Incomers to Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.18.01Keywords:
Poland, migrant, refugee, migrant integration, perception of foreignersAbstract
This article concerns select aspects of social perceptions and categorizations of foreigners settling in Poland. The core of this work is an analysis of a series of qualitative interviews conducted with young, educated residents of Warsaw. Herein the authors draw attention to a significant change in the consciousness of Polish society: a recognition of the permanent presence of migrants in Poland as well as discernment of the sociocultural problems associated with that presence. In the eyes of our interlocutors, the past two decades have been a time in which the attitude of Poles towards incoming aliens has shifted. Influencing opinions have been personal or familial experiences of emigration, particularly after the 2004 accession of Poland into the European Union. Also affecting attitudes have been an immigration wave from Ukraine as well as the tangible consequences of the 2015 migrant crisis. On the one hand, all these factors together have caused Poland to be seen today as not only an emigration, but also an immigration country. On the other hand, these have also provoked a conscious classification of various categories of migrants with regards to their geographic and cultural background along with the roles they might possibly fill in this country.
References
Andrejuk, K. (2019). Politicizing Muslim Immigration in Poland – Discursive and Regulatory Dimensions. In: K. Górak-Sosnowska, M. Pachocka, J. Misiuna (ed.), Muslim Minorities and the Refugee Crisis in Europe (pp. 205–221). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics SGH Publishing House.
View in Google Scholar
ielecka-Prus J. (2018). Retoryka lęku przed obcym w polskim dyskursie prasowym, Colloquium Wydziału Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych – Kwartalnik, 1/2018, 5–34.
View in Google Scholar
CBOS (2018). Stosunek Polaków i Czechów do przyjmowania uchodźców: Komunikat z badań, nr 87, July, Downloaded from: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2018/K_087_18.PDF.
View in Google Scholar
CBOS (2020a). Praca obcokrajowców w Polsce: Komunikat z badań, nr 5, January, Downloaded from: https://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_005_20.PDF.
View in Google Scholar
CBOS (2020b). Stosunek do innych narodów: Komunikat z badań, nr 31, March, Downloaded from: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_031_20.PDF.
View in Google Scholar
Dudkiewicz M., Majewski, P. (ed.). (2017). Cudzoziemcy w Warszawie, czyli jak się zmierzyć z nieuniknionym: Raport, Warszawa: Uniwersytet SWPS, Fundacja Obserwatorium
View in Google Scholar
Górny, A., Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S., Winiarska, A. (ed.). (2018). Po sąsiedzku z różnorodnością: Interakcje w miejskich przestrzeniach lokalnych z perspektywy różnych grup mieszkańców, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR
View in Google Scholar
Hall, D., Mikulska-Jolles, A. (2016). Uprzedzenia, strach czy niewiedza? Młodzi Polacy o powodach niechęci do przyjmowania uchodźców, Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie Interwencji Prawnej.
View in Google Scholar
Jaskułowski, K. (2019). The Everyday Politics of Migration Crisis in Poland: Between Nationalism, Fear and Empathy. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10457-3
Kowalczyk, B. (2014). Polski system azylowy. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski –E-Wydawnictwo, Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa
View in Google Scholar
Kropiński, M., Hansen, K. (2016). Jakie skojarzenia ze słowem „uchodźca” mają Polacy? Warszawa: Centrum Badań nad Uprzedzeniami Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 1–15.
View in Google Scholar
Okólski, M., Wach, D. (2020). Immigration and integration policies in the absence of immigrants A case study of Poland. In: M. Duszczyk, M. Pachocka, D. Pszczółkowska (ed.), Relations between Immigration and Integration Policies in Europe Challenges, Opportunities and Perspectives in Selected EU Member States (pp. 146–172). London: Routledge
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429263736-9
Pachocka, M., Misiuna, J. (2015). Migracje międzynarodowe – dylematy definicyjne i poznawcze. Przykłady z Unii Europejskiej i Stanów Zjednoczonych. In: J. Osiński (ed.), Współczesny Matrix? Fikcja w życiu gospodarczym, politycznym i społecznym. (pp. 293–312). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH
View in Google Scholar
Pachocka M., Pędziwiatr, K. Sobczak-Szelc, K., Szałańska, J. (2020). Reception Policies, Practices and Responses: Poland. Country Report, The Horizon 2020 project RESPOND-Multilevel Governance of Mass Migration in Europe and Beyond (770564), Downloaded from: https://www.academia.edu/42325455/Recezption_Policies_Practicies_and_Responses_Poland_Country_Report.
View in Google Scholar
Rea, A., Martiniello, M., Mazzola, A., Meuleman, B. (2019). The Refugee Reception Crisis in Europe Polarized Opinions and Mobilizations. In: A. Rea, M. Martiniello, A. Mazzola, B. Meuleman (ed.), The Refuge Reception Crisis in Europe: Polarized Opinion and Mobilizations (pp. 11–30). Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles
View in Google Scholar
Switat, M. (2018). Rasizm i mechanizmy mu pokrewne w kontekście badań nad diasporą arabską w Polsce, Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 1/2018, 189–218, DOI: 10.4467/25444972SMPP.18.009.8918
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SMPP.18.009.8918
Trąbka, A. (2016). Wybór, kontrola i refleksja: Kategoria sprawstwa w badaniach migracyjnych, Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 3/2016, 81–102.
View in Google Scholar
Žagar, I., Ž. (2018). Devolution of language in post- -democracy: decaying discourse on refugees from the Bosnian to the Syrian War. In: I. Ž. Žagar, N. Kogovšek Šalamon, M. Lukšič Hacin (ed.). The Disaster of European Refugee Policy: Perspectives from the “Balkan Route” (pp. 103–132). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.