Learning global solidarity in the Covid-19 pandemic?

Autor

  • Christoph Rehmann-Sutter Institute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Lübeck, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.21.02

Słowa kluczowe:

Complexity, Trust, Inequalities, Covid-19, Judgement

Abstrakt

In a letter published on March 30, 2021, 24 world leaders have called for global solidarity in the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic. This commitment to act in solidarity with low-income countries however was won under duress, and it was in part at least self-serving. Can this still be called solidarity? On the basis of a functional view on solidarity the paper argues that states can indeed act in solidarity, if they accept costs to assist others with whom they recognize similarity in a relevant respect. States can act in solidarity, or they can fail to act in solidarity, also in situations of duress and if solidary acts also serve their own interests. The paper concludes that if this is true for the Covid-19 pandemic it is also true for the climate crisis, where damage of even much bigger dimensions are to be prevented. Also in regard to anthropogenic global heating, nobody is safe until everyone is safe.

Biogram autora

Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - Institute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Lübeck, Germany

Christoph Rehmann-Sutter is Professor of Theory and Ethics in the Biosciences at the University of Lübeck in Germany and honorary professor of philosophy at the University of Basel, Switzerland. He has widely published in philosophy and ethics of biomedicine and biotechnology. Research interests include philosophical foundations of bioethics and phenomenological philosophy of biology. With a hermeneutic approach to ethics and often with qualitative empirical methods, he has been working about ethical issues of genetic engineering, of prenatal genetics, transplantation, stem cell medicine and palliative care, currently also on the ethics of climate change. Together with Heike Gudat and Kathrin Ohnsorge he edited a volume at Oxford University Press on The Patient's Wish to Die. Research, Ethics, and Palliative Care (2015). Genes in Development. Re-Reading the Molecular Paradigm (Duke University Press 2006) was edited together with Eva Neumann-Held. His last books are on our views of death and dying: Was uns der Tod bedeutet (Berlin: Kadmos 2018) and on the ethics of bone marrow transplantation from children as donors: Stem cell transplantation between siblings as a social phenomenon: The child’s body and family decision-making (ed. together with Christina Schües, Madeleine Herzog and Martina Jürgensen; Springer 2022).

Bibliografia

Bundesverfassungsgericht (2021). Beschluss über Verfassungsbeschwerden zum Klimaschutzgesetz vom 24. März 2021. Downloaded from: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2021/03/rs20210324_1bvr265618.html
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Capron, A. M. (2007). Imagining a New World. Using Internationalism to Overcome the 10/90 Gap in Bioethics. Bioethics, 21(8), 409–412.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00577.x

Hamilton, I., et al. (2021). The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: A modelling study. Lancet Planet Health, 5, e74–83.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30249-7

Johnson, B., et al. (30 March 2021). No government can address the threat of pandemics alone – we must come together. We must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond. The Telegraph
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kellenberger, J. (1995). Relationship Morality. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mann, M. E. (2021). The New Climate Ware. The Fight to Take Back Our Planet. London: Scribe.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Perkowski, N. (2018). Frontex and the convergence of humanitarianism, human rights and security. Security Dialogue, 49(6), 457–475.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618796670

Prainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2015). Solidarity in bioethics and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Prainsack, B., Buyx, A. (2016). Thinking ethical and regulatory frameworks in medicine from the perspective of solidarity on both sides of the Atlantic. Theor Med Bioeth, 37, 489–501.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9390-8

Squire, V., et al. (2017). Crossing the Mediterranean Sea by Boat: Mapping and documenting migratory journeys and experiences [Final project report]. University of Warwick. Downloaded from: www. warwick.ac.uk/crossingthemed.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. (2021). Covid-19: Make it the Last Pandemic. Geneva: WHO. Downloaded from: https://theindependentpanel.org/mainreport/
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/nzsr.v77i1-2.7752

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2021-01-01

Jak cytować

Rehmann-Sutter, C. (2021). Learning global solidarity in the Covid-19 pandemic?. Władza Sądzenia, (21), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.18778/2300-1690.21.02

Numer

Nr 21 (2021)

Dział

Articles

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.