Responding to Modern Sensibilities: Emma and Edvard Entangled
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/texmat-2017-0008Keywords:
Munch, Bovary, desire, entanglementAbstract
This article is an edited version of the response paper offered at the conclusion of the symposium, Modern Sensibilities. It ties together themes from the symposium papers, as well as ideas prompted by Mieke Bal’s exhibition, Emma & Edvard: Love in the Time of Loneliness, and her accompanying book, Emma and Edvard Looking Sideways: Loneliness and the Cinematic. It focuses on the anachronistic entanglements among Flaubert’s “Emma,” Munch’s motifs, Mieke Bal and Michelle Williams Gamaker’s Madame B, the Munch Museum’s architecture and exhibition scenography, and the exhibition viewer.
Downloads
References
Alphen, Ernst van. “Modernity as a Crisis of the Senses.” Modern Sensibilities Conference, 23–24 March 2017, Munch Museum, Oslo. Lecture.
Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. “Ecstatic Aesthetics.” Compelling Visuality: The Work of Art in and Out of Art History. Ed. Claire J. Farago and Robert Zwijnenberg. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. 1–30. Print.
Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. Emma and Edvard Looking Sideways: Loneliness and the Cinematic. New Haven: Yale, 2017. Print.
Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke and Michelle Williams Gamaker. Madame B. Video Exhibition. Oslo: Munch Museum, 2017.
Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text.” Image—Music—Text. Trans. Stephan Heath. New York: Hill, 1977. 155–64. Print.
Google Scholar
Berman, Patricia G. “The Many Lives of Edvard Munch.” Edvard Munch: Catalogue Raisonné. Ed. Gerd Woll et al. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Forlag and Munch Museum, 2008. 1277–93. Print.
Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “Flaubert’s Provocation.” Modern Sensibilities Conference, 23–24 March 2017, Munch Museum, Oslo. Lecture.
Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. Images in Spite of All: Four Photographs from Auschwitz. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Endresen, Signe. “Serial Experiments: Close-Readings of Edvard Munch’s Det grønne værelset (1907).” Diss. U of Oslo, 2015. Print.
Google Scholar
Ferrer, Eun-Jin Strand. Message to the author. 8 May 2017. E-mail.
Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, “The ‘Uncanny.’” Pelican Freud Library. Ed. James Strachey. Vol. 14. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1985. 339–76. Print.
Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. “Acting Modern: Art and Love in Ibsen and Munch.” Modern Sensibilities Conference, 23–24 March 2017, Munch Museum, Oslo. Lecture.
Google Scholar
Heller, Reinhold. Munch: His Life and Work. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. Print.
Google Scholar
Hernández Navarro, Miguel Ángel. “Time for Emotions: Anachronism and Expansion in Flaubert / Bal & Williams Gamaker / Munch / Knausgård.” Modern Sensibilities Conference, 23–24 March 2017, Munch Museum, Oslo. Lecture.
Google Scholar
Pollock, Griselda. “Staging Subjectivity: Charlotte Salomon Reading Munch.” Modern Sensibilities Conference, 23–24 March 2017, Munch Museum, Oslo. Lecture.
Google Scholar
Roberts, Jennifer L. “The Power of Patience.” Harvard Magazine (Nov.– Dec. 2013): 40–43. Print.
Google Scholar
Røed, Kjetil. “The Best Munch Exhibition I Have Ever Seen!” Aftenposten. no. Aftenposten 27 Jan. 2017. Web. 20 Mar. 2017.
Google Scholar
Steegmuller, Francis. The Letters of Gustave Flaubert, 1830–1857. London: Belknap, 1980. Print.
Google Scholar
Templeton, Joan. Munch’s Ibsen: A Painter’s Vision of a Playwright. Seattle: U of Washington P, 2008. Print.
Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. “Entangled Modernities.” European Journal of Social Theory 6.3 (2003): 293–305. Print.
Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997. Print.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.