Attention for Distraction: Modernity, Modernism and Perception

Authors

  • Ernst van Alphen Leiden University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/texmat-2017-0005

Keywords:

distraction, attention, modernity, modernism, abstraction

Abstract

Particularly in the latter half of the nineteenth century sensorial experiences changed at breakneck speed. Social and technological developments of modernity like the industrial revolution, rapid urban expansion, the advance of capitalism and the invention of new technologies transformed the field of the senses. Instead of attentiveness, distraction became prevalent. It is not only Baudelaire who addressed these transformations in his poems, but they can also be recognized in the works of novelist Gustave Flaubert and painter Edward Munch. By means of the work of William James, Walter Benjamin, Siegfried Kracauer and Georg Simmel, the repercussions of this crisis of the senses for subjectivity will be discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ernst van Alphen, Leiden University

Ernst van Alphen is Professor of Literary Studies at Leiden University. His publications include Francis Bacon and the Loss of Self (Harvard UP), Caught By History: Holocaust Effects in Art, Literature, and Theory (Stanford UP), Art In Mind: How Contemporary Images Shape Thought (U of Chicago P), Staging the Archive: Art and Photography in Times of New Media (Reaktion Books). The following book is in press: Failed Im­ages: Photography Beyond Dominant Practices.

References

Alphen, Ernst van. “Figurations of Self: Modernism and Distraction.” Modernism. Vol. 2. Ed. Astradur Eysteinson and Vivian Liska. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007. 339–46. Print.
Google Scholar

Armstrong, Tom. Modernism, Technology and the Body. Cambridge: Cam­bridge UP, 1998. Print.
Google Scholar

Baer, Ulrich. Remnants of Song: Trauma and the Experience of Modernity in Charles Baudelaire and Paul Celan. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2001. Print.
Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. Emma and Edvard Looking Sideways: Loneliness and the Cinematic. Oslo: Munch Museum, 2017. Print.
Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1969. 217–52. Print
Google Scholar

Crary, Jonathan. Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1999. Print.
Google Scholar

Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1990. Print.
Google Scholar

Crary, Jonathan. “Unbinding Vision.” October 68 (Spring 1994): 21–44. Print.
Google Scholar

Fokkema, Douwe, and Elrud Ibsch. Het Modernisme in de Europese Letterkunde. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers, 1984. Print.
Google Scholar

Miller, Tyrus. Late Modernism: Politics, Fiction, and the Arts Between the World Wars. Berkeley: U of California P, 1999. Print.
Google Scholar

Prelinger, Elizabeth. After the Scream: The Late Paintings of Edvard Munch. Atlanta, GA: High Museum of Art, 2002. Print.
Google Scholar

Rilke, Rainer Maria. The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge. Trans. Michael Hulse. London: Penguin Classics, 2009. Print.
Google Scholar

Ruskin, John. “Modern Painters.” The Complete Works of John Ruskin. Ed. E. T. Cook. Vol. 5. London: Georg Allen, 1908. 316–20. Print.
Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Ed. Donald N. Levine. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 1971. 324–39. Print.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2017-10-16

How to Cite

van Alphen, E. (2017). Attention for Distraction: Modernity, Modernism and Perception. Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture, (7), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/texmat-2017-0005