Negatywność jako sefira surowego sądu mieszczaństwa. Faust i Hiob

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.23.03

Abstrakt

The paper, drawing upon Kabbalistic inspirations, aims at constructing a philosophical model of the bourgeoisie. Many a time motifs from Jewish tradition have been grafted onto contemporary philosophy in order to explicate the metaphysical situation of modernity. Following these intuitions, the article applies the idea of the fifth Sephirah, Gevurah, i.e. “restraint” — simultaneously doubling as Din, “judgment” — to analyse the structure of being in the ontology of modernity. The nature of the fifth Sephirah proves paradoxical: it represents the power of being, based on the inherent constraint separating a thing from exteriority — as well as the power of destruction, which unites the being with the rest of reality. Therefore, the Gevurah-Din concept allows of devising a being whose mere existence springs from a central void which provides its singularity and, simultaneously, linkage with reality.

The paper presents the nature of the bourgeoisie as conditioned by negativity. The bourgeois are constantly tempted by its power, yet build their identity reactively, striving for artificial stability. The iconic bourgeois lifestyle of the ruthless merchant at work and disinterested culture consumer at home, embodies this dualism. The bourgeois culture is dead throughout, as it serves only to constrain the negativity. The bourgeoisie is, however, subjected to a constant risk of imbalance, “seduction” by its innermost dark side. This construction is equally responsible for the archetypal modern hero, Faust, who chases its central void by ruining the world around him.

Finally, the article juxtaposes two characters: Faust and Job, in order to give a Jewish answer to modern misery. Both Faust and Job suffer from the power of judgment, yet Faust obtains a sentence that merely reveals its void which has always propelled him. The existence of Job, on the contrary, is not equal to void — Job survives as the just.

Bibliografia

Adorno, T. W., 1999, Minima moralia, przeł. M. Łukasiewicz, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bielik-Robson, A., 2008, Na pustyni: kryptoteologie późnej nowoczesności, Kraków: Universitas.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Bloom, H., 1975, Kabbalah and Criticism. A Continuum Book, New York: The Seabury Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., 1997, Nietzsche i filozofia, przeł. B. Banasiak, Warszawa: Spacja.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fine, L., 2003, Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos. Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic Fellowship, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503618619

Foucault, M., 2006, Słowa i rzeczy, przeł. T. Komendant, Gdańsk: słowo/obraz terytoria.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Freud, S., 1996, Objaśnianie marzeń sennych, przeł. R. Reszke, Warszawa: KR.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., 1968, Nauka logiki, przeł. A. Landman, Warszawa: PWN, t. II.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., 1969, Zasady filozofii prawa, przeł. A. Landman, Warszawa: PWN.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., 1994, Wykłady z historii filozofii, przeł. Ś. F. Nowicki, Warszawa: PWN.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., 2002, Fenomenologia ducha, przeł. Ś. F. Nowicki, Warszawa: Aletheia.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Hyppolite, J., 1971, Figures de la pensée philosophique, Paris: PUF.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Idel, M., 2006, Kabała. Nowe perspektywy, przeł. M. Krawczyk, Kraków: NOMOS.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kafka, F., 2007, Aforyzmy z Zürau, przeł. A. Szlosarek, Kraków: EMG.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kristeva, J., 1974, La révolution du langage poétique, Paris: Seuil.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lacan, J., 1975, Le Séminaire. Livre XX : Encore, Paris: Seuil.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lacan, J., 2004, Le Séminaire. Livre X : L’angoisse, Paris: Seuil.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Lacan, J., 2007, Le Séminaire. Livre XVIII : D’un discours qui ne serait pas du semblant, Paris: Seuil.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mann, T., 1960, Doktor Faustus, przeł. M. Kurecka i W. Wirpsza, Warszawa: Czytelnik.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Marks, K., Engels, F., 1949, Manifest komunistyczny, [w:] Dzieła wybrane, Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, t. I.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Ouaknin, M.-A., 2003, Concerto pour quatre consonnes sans voyelles. Au-delà du principe d’identité, Paris: Payot.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, F., 1998, Gwiazda zbawienia, przeł. T. Gadacz, Kraków: Znak.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Schmitt, C., 2000, Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, przeł. M. Cichocki, Kraków: Znak.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Scholem, G., 1983, „La signification de la Loi dans la mystique juive”, [w:] Le Nom et les symboles de Dieu dans la mystique juive, trad. de M. R. Hayoun et G. Vajda, Paris: Cerf.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Scholem, G., 2003, La Kabbale, Paris: Gallimard.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Weber, M., 1994, Etyka protestancka a duch kapitalizmu, przeł. J. Miziński, Lublin: TEST.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2013-12-30

Jak cytować

Tacik, P. (2013). Negatywność jako sefira surowego sądu mieszczaństwa. Faust i Hiob. Hybris, 23(4), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.23.03

Numer

Dział

Artykuły