Naturalizacja absolutu. Zastosowanie mechanizmów eksplanacyjnych ewolucjonizmu do badań nad religią

Kinga Kowalczyk-Purol

doi:10.18778/1689-4286.24.05

Autor

Kinga Kowalczyk-Purol Uniwersytet Szczeciński

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.24.05

Abstrakt

The question which has troubled scholars for many decades (or even centuries) is the origin and function of religion. In this article, the author tries to sketch an outline of a new and promising paradigm in the study of religion, i.e. the evolutionary theories of religion. It is widely held belief that this enterprise should further provide an explanatory framework for an enormous amount of data about human religiosity. Such an aim requires giving an overview of the three fundamental Darwinian theories which pertain to this extremely multifaceted phenomenon. The sequence in the overview is like this: (a) a historical and conceptual background, (b) a sociobiological account, (c) a cognitive account, (d) a memetic account. The paper also comprises a short presentation of so-called co-evolutionary perspective, which integrates the above-mentioned outlooks, and some shortcomings of the whole evolutionary program of the study of religion.

Bibliografia

Barrett, Justin L., 2008, Keeping „Science” in the Cognitive Science of Religion, [w:] Joseph Bulbulia, Richard Sosis, Erica Harris i in. (red.), The Evolution of Religion. Studies, Theories & Critiques, Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press, ss. 295–301.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Blackmore, Susan, 2002, Maszyna memowa, przeł. Norbert Radomski, Poznań: Rebis.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Blume, Michael, 2009, The Reproductive Benefits of Religious Affilation, [w:] Eckart Voland, Wulf Schiefenhövel (red.), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, Nowy Jork: Springer-Verlag, ss. 117–126.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_8

Brockman, John, 1996, Powstaje trzecia kultura, [w:] J. Brockman (red.), Trzecia kultura, przeł. Piotr Amsterdamski i in., Warszawa: CiS, ss. 15–36.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard, 1996, Samolubny gen, przeł. Marek Skoneczny, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard, 2003, A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love, Nowy Jork: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel, 2008, Odczarowanie. Religia jako zjawisko naturalne, przeł. Barbara Stanosz, Warszawa: PIW.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Fetchenhauer, Detlef, 2009, Evolutionary Perspectives on Religion – What They Can and What They Cannot Explain (Yet), [w:] Eckart Voland, Wulf Schiefenhövel (red.), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, Nowy Jork: Springer-Verlag, ss. 275–291.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00128-4_19

Flis, Andrzej, 2003, Chrześcijaństwo i Europa. Studia z dziejów cywilizacji Zachodu, Kraków: Nomos.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, Murray, 2002, Plectics: The study of simplicity and complexity, “Europhysics News”, nr 33, ss. 17–20.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epn:2002105

Grzymała-Moszczyńska, Halina, 2004, Religia a kultura. Wybrane zagadnienia z kulturowej psychologii religii, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Martin, Luther H., 2008, Can Religion Really Evolve? (And What Is It Anyway?), [w:] Joseph Bulbulia, Richard Sosis, Erica Harris i in. (red.), The Evolution of Religion. Studies, Theories & Critiques, Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press, ss. 349–355.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

McIntosh, Daniel N., 1995, Religion-as-schema, with implications for the relation between religion and coping, “The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion”, nr 5, 1–16.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0501_1

Newberg, Andrew; d’Aquili, Eugene i Rause, Vince, 2001, Why God Won't Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belief, Nowy Jork: Ballantine Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Nowaczyk, Mirosław, 1989, Ewolucjonizm kulturowy a religia, Warszawa: PWN.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Persinger, Michael, 2002, The temporal lobe: The biological basis of the God Experience, [w:] Rhawn Joseph (red.), Neurotheology: Brain, science, spirituality, religious experience, San Jose: University Press, ss. 273–278.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Piątek, Zdzisława, 2007, Pawi ogon czyli o biologicznych uwarunkowaniach kultury, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alex i McShea, Daniel W., 2008, Philosophy of Biology. A Contemporary Introduction, Nowy Jork: Routledge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Smolin, Lee, 1997, Życie wszechświata: Nowe spojrzenie na kosmologię, przeł. Danuta Czyżewska, Warszawa: Amber.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Sosis, Richard, 2004, The Adaptive Value of Religious Ritual. Rituals Promote Group Cohesion by Requiring Members to Engage in Behavior that is too Costly to Fake, „American Scientist”, nr 92, ss. 166–172.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1511/2004.46.928

Stone, Linda i Lurquin, Paul F., 2009, Geny, kultura i ewolucja człowieka. Synteza, przeł. Wojciech Branicki, Wiesław Więckowski, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Thomson, J. Anderson i Aukofer, Clare, 2011, Why we believe in god(s). A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith, Charlottesville 2011: Pitchstone Publishing.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wężowicz-Ziółkowska, Dobrosława, 2008, Moc narrativum. Idee biologii we współczesnym dyskursie humanistycznym, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wilson, David S., 2003, Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wilson, Edward O., 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard: Belknap Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wright, Richard, 2004, Moralne zwierzę. Dlaczego jesteśmy tacy, a nie inni: psychologia ewolucyjna a życie codzienne, przeł. Hanna Jankowska, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Wszołek, Stanisław, 2004, Wprowadzenie do filozofii religii, Kraków: WAM.
Zobacz w Google Scholar