Probabilistic approach to epistemic modals in the framework of dynamic semantics

Milana Kostic

doi:10.18778/1689-4286.30.03

Autor

Milana Kostic University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.30.03

Słowa kluczowe:

dynamic semantics, probabilistic semantics, epistemic modals

Abstrakt

In dynamic semantics meaning of a statement is not equated with its truth conditions but with its context change potential. It has also been claimed that dynamic framework can automatically account for certain paradoxes that involve epistemic modals, such as the following one: it seems odd and incoherent to claim: (1) “It is raining and it might not rain”, whereas claiming (2) “It might not rain and it is raining” does not seem equally odd (Yalcin, 2007). Nevertheless, it seems that it cannot capture the fact that statement (2) seems odd as well, even though not as odd as the statement (1) (Gauker, 2007). I will argue that certain probabilistic extensions to the dynamic model can account for this subtlety of our linguistic intuitions and represent if not an improved than at least an alternative framework for capturing the way contexts are updated and beliefs revised with uncertain information.

Bibliografia

Baltag Alexandru, Smets Sonja, 2008, Probabilistic Dynamic Belief Revision, “Synthese” 165 (2), pp. 179–202.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9369-8

Dowty, David, Wall, Robert, and Peters, Stanley, 1981, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9065-4

Dorr, Cian, Hawthorne John, 2012, Embedding Epistemic Modals, manuscript.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt091

Egan, Andy, 2007, Epistemic modals, relativism and assertion, “Philosophical Studies”, 133(1), pp.1–22.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9003-x

Frege, Gottlob, 2001, On Sense and Reference, [in:] David Sosa (ed.), Analytic Philosophy: an Anthology, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 7–19.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gauker, Christopher, Comments on dynamic semantics. APA Central Division Chicago.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Groenendijk, Jeroen, Stokhof, Martin, 1991, Dynamic predicate logic, “Linguistics and Philosophy” 14 (1), pp. 39–100.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628304

Groenendijk, Jeroen, Stokhof, Martin, 1996, Changing the context: dynamic semantics and discourse, [in:] Edit Doron & Shuly Wintner (eds), IATL 3: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse, Jerusalem: Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 104–128.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Geach, Peter, 1962, Reference and Generality, New York: Cornell University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Goodman, Noah, Lassiter, Daniel, 2014. Probabilistic semantics and pragmatics: Uncertainty in language and thought, [in:] Shalom Lappin (ed), Handbook of Contemporary Semantics, Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, pp: 1–46.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch21

Goodman Noah, Lassiter Daniel, Communicating with Epistemic Modals in Stochastic λ-Calculus, manuscript.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Holliday, Wesley Halcrow, Icard, Thomas Frederick III, 2013, Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals, “Semantics and Linguistic Theory” 23, pp. 514–534.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v23i0.2670

Janssen, Theo M. V., “Montague Semantics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/montague-semantics/
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika, 2012, Modals and Conditionals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.003.0004

Sorensen, Roy, 2009, Meta-agnosticism: Higher Order Epistemic Possibility, “Mind” 118 (471), pp: 777–784.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp105

Van Eijck, Jan, Lappin Shalom, 2014, Probabilistic Semantics for Natural Language, unpublished manuscript
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Veltman, Frank, 1996, Defaults in update semantics, “Journal of Philosophical Logic” 25 (3), pp. 221–261.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248150

Willer, Martha, 2013, Dynamics of Epistemic Modality, “Philosophical Review” 122 (1), pp.45–92.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1728714

Yalcin, Seth, 2007, Epistemic Modals, “Mind” 116 (464), pp. 983–1026.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm983

Yalcin, Seth, 2010, Probability Operators, “Philosophy Compass”, 5 (11), pp. 916–937.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00360.x

Yalcin, Seth, 2012. Context Probabilism, [in:] Maria Aloni (ed.), 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 12–21.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_2