Conceptual spaces in object-oriented framework

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.35.01

Słowa kluczowe:

przestrzenie pojęciowe, programowanie zorientowane obiektowo, prototypowa teoria kategoryzacji, nieostrość, architektura poznawcza

Abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to show that the middle level of mental representations in a conceptual spaces framework is consistent with the OOP paradigm. We argue that conceptual spaces framework together with vague prototype theory of categorization appears to be the most suitable solution for modeling the cognitive apparatus of humans, and that the OOP paradigm can be easily and intuitively reconciled with this framework. First, we show that the prototype-based OOP approach is consistent with Gärdenfors’ model in terms of structural coherence. Second, we argue that the product of cloning process in a prototype-based model is in line with the structure of categories in Gärdenfors’ proposal. Finally, in order to make the fuzzy object-oriented model consistent with conceptual space, we demonstrate how to define membership function in a more cognitive manner, i.e. in terms of similarity to prototype.

Bibliografia

Berlin Brent, Kay Paul, 1969, Basic color terms, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Coombs Clyde Hamilton, 1964, A theory of data, New York: Wiley.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Decock Lieven, Douven Igor, 2014, What Is Graded Membership? “Noûs”, 48, pp. 653–682.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12003

Douven Igor, Decock Lieven, Dietz Richard, Égré Paul, 2013, Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach, “Journal of Philosophical Logic” 42(1), pp. 137–160.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9216-0

Evans Vyvyan, A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Gärdenfors Peter, 2000, Conceptual spaces, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001

Gärdenfors Peter, 2014, Geometry of meaning – Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001

Gärdenfors Peter, 2015, Cognitive science: from computers to ant hills as models of human thought [in:] Gemel A., Łukowski P., Żukowski B., (ed.), Cognition, Meaning and Action. Lodz-Lund Studies in Cognitive Science, Lodz-Cracow: Lodz – Jagiellonian University Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-759-5.02

Hampton A. James, 2007, Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness, “Cognitive Science” 31(3), pp. 355-384.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701326402

Marin Nicolas, Pons Olga, Vila A. Maria, 2000, Fuzzy Types: A New Concept of Type for Managing Vague Structures, “International Journal of Intelligent Systems”, Vol. 15, pp. 1061-1085.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-111X(200011)15:11<1061::AID-INT5>3.0.CO;2-A

Marin Nicolas, Pons Olga, Vila A. Maria, 2001, A Strategy for Adding Fuzzy Types to an Object-Oriented Database System, International Journal Of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 16, pp. 863-880.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.1039

Mather George, 2001, Object-oriented models of cognitive processing, “Trends in Cognitive Sciences”, 5(5), pp. 182-184.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01649-1

Mayhew John, Frisby John, 1984, Computer vision, [in:] O’Shea T., Eisenstadt M., (eds.) Artificial Intelligence: Tools, Techniques, and Applications, New York: Harper & Row pp. 301–357.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Mervis Catlin, Rosch Eleanor, 1981, Categorization of natural objects, „Annual Review of Psychology” 32, pp. 89-115.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513

Lakoff George, 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Osherson N. Daniel, Smith, E. Edward, 1981, On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts, “Cognition” 29, pp. 259–288.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, 1975, Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories, w: „Journal of Experimental Psychology”, 104, pp. 192-233.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192

Shepard N. Roger, 1962, The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Part l, „Psychometrika” 27, pp. 125-140.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289630

Sheetz, Steven, Tegarden David, 2001, Illustrating the cognitive consequences of object-oriented systems development, “The Journal of Systems and Software”, 59, pp. 163-179.
Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00060-7

Taivalsaari Antero, 1997, Classes vs. Prototypes: Some Philosophical and Historical Observations, “Journal of Object-Oriented Programming” 10(7), pp. 44-50.
Zobacz w Google Scholar

Opublikowane

2016-12-30

Jak cytować

Gemel, A., & Ishii, T. (2016). Conceptual spaces in object-oriented framework. Hybris, 35(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.35.01