Cognitive theory of metaphor and Jerzy Wróblewski’s concept of legal interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.39.04Słowa kluczowe:
metafora konceptualna, Jerzy Wróblewski, wykładnia prawa, wykładnia funkcjonalna, Lakoff i JohnsonAbstrakt
Jerzy Wróblewski is one of the most prominent and influential legal theorists in Poland. His theory of legal interpretation containing a division into linguistic, systemic and functional dimension is highly regarded by Polish legal community. However, when formulating the theory Wróblewski was aware that his theory lacks some elements. In his work he points out that despite three dimensions the result of the interpretation is still unpredictable. For instance, interpreter’s personality might be additional factor influencing legal interpretation process. In this context, Wróblewski compares the lawmaker to a composer and a subject making legal interpretation to a musician performing a piece of music. Wróblewski emphasizes the importance of such factors. However, an interpreter should disregard additional factors in the process of legal interpretation.
At the time, when Wróblewski formulated his theory, the cognitive science was not developed yet. Nowadays, Lakoff Johnson’s idea of conceptual metaphors is widely known and might be one of the missing elements Wróblewski had in mind.
This paper will examine such possibility and its consequences. Firstly Wróblewski’s theory of legal interpretation will be presented. Next, I will move to a brief description of Lakoff-Johnson theory. Then, it will be discussed if such approach is possible in terms of Wróblewski’s theory. Finally, the necessary modification of legal interpretation theory will be analyzed. In this part, the key question is whether the metaphorical aspect is a new dimenson of legal interpretation.
Bibliografia
Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1934. “Obraz Świata I Aparatura Pojęciowa.” In Język I Poznanie, 1:175–95. Warszawa 1985: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Holocher, Justyna. 2009. Kontekst Odkrycia I Kontekst Uzasadnienia W Świetle Topicznej Koncepcji Prawa, Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, LXXX: 9–29.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. 2nd edition. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lessig, Lawrence. 2005. Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. Reprint edition. New York: Penguin Books.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Reyman, Jessica. 2012. The Rhetoric of Intellectual Property: Copyright Law and the Regulation of Digital Culture. 1 edition. Place of publication not identified: Routledge.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Rybarkiewicz, Dorota. 2015. “Rozumowanie metaforyczne, czyli ‘metaforą po oczach,’” Folia Iuridica, , no. 75: 207–25.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.75.14
Wróblewski, Jerzy. 1959. Zagadnienia teorii wykładni prawa ludowego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Wroblewski, Jerzy. 1969. “Legal Reasoning in Legal Interpretation.” Logique et Analyse 12 (45): 3–31.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Zirk-Sadowski, Marek, and Maciej Zieliński. 2011. “Klaryfikacyjność I Derywacyjność W Integrowaniu Polskich Teorii Wykładni Prawa,” Ruch Prawny, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, no. 2: 99–111.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Funding data
-
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Grant numbers DEC-2013/09/B/HS5/02529