Political transhumanism – future without crisis?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.42.07

Keywords:

transhumanism, political transhumanism, technolibertarianism, technoprogressivism, crisis

Abstract

As is the case with every utopian vision of the future, transhumanism offers some social and political solutions. In recent years transhumanists on both sides of the Atlantic have been trying to make this ideas visible and hearable in the political mainstream, which makes them all the more interesting. The text examines the set of beliefs supported and promoted by political transhumanism in order to estimate their persuasiveness and their potential efficiency in dealing with the problems they allegedly would solve. First I try to present the general profile of the political dimension of transhumanism. Then, as a result, two main transhumanist political stances are distinguished: technolibertarianism and technoprogressivism. This allows to analyse the functioning of the notion of crisis in the political rhetoric of transhumanism.

References

Barbrook, R., Cameron, A. (1996). Californian Ideology. [w:] Science as Culture, Vol. 6, ss. 44-72.
View in Google Scholar

Benedikter, R., Siepmann, K., McIntosh, A. (2015). Zoltan Istvan’s “Teleological Egocentric Functionalism”: A Libertarian Philosophical Basis for “Transhumanist” Politics, [w:] Wood, D.W., Karran, A.J. (red.), Envisioning Politics 2.0, https://transpolitica.org/2015/07/02/zoltan-istvans-teleological-egocentric-functionalism-a-libertarian-philosophical-basis-for-transhumanist-politics/ [dostęp z dn. 30.09.2017].
View in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2003). Transhumanist Values. http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/values.pdf [dostęp z dn. 15.07.2018].
View in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2005). In Defense of Posthuman Dignity, [w:] Bioethics 19, no. 3, s. 202-214.
View in Google Scholar

Bostrom, N. (2016). Superinteligencja. Scenariusz, strategie, zagrożenia. Gliwice: Helion SA.
View in Google Scholar

Cole-Turner, R. (red.) (2011). Transhumanism and Transcendence. Christian Hope in an Age of Technological Enhancement. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Dambrot, S. M. (2015). Of Mind and Money: Post-Scarcity Economics and Human Nature, [w:] Wood, D.W., Karran, A.J. (red.), Envisioning Politics 2.0, https://transpolitica.org/2015/07/18/of-mind-and-money-post-scarcity-economics-and-human-nature/ [dostęp z dn. 30.09.2017].
View in Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2004). Koniec człowieka. Konsekwencje rewolucji biotechnologicznej. Kraków: Znak.
View in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (2003). Przyszłość natury ludzkiej. Czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
View in Google Scholar

Hayles, K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Hellekin, B. (2016). What Agreements and Disagreements Exist Between Conservatism and Transhumanism. http://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/10334/what-agreements-and-disagreements-exist-between-conservatism-and-transhumanism [dostęp z dn. 10.10.2017]
View in Google Scholar

Published

2018-09-30

How to Cite

Misztal, D. (2018). Political transhumanism – future without crisis?. Hybris, 42(3), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.42.07

Issue

Section

Articles