Ja – ty – dzieło jako źródło poznania. Między neokantyzmem a hermeneutyką: Cassirer i Ricoeur

Marta Węgrzyn

doi:10.18778/1689-4286.50.03

Authors

Marta Węgrzyn Uniwersytet Jagielloński

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.50.03

Keywords:

I – You – Work, basis phenomena, Neo-Kantianism, hermeneutic phenomenology, interpretation

Abstract

An attempt to compare the epistemological positions of two thinkers coming from different philosophical traditions requires turning to the sources of both philosophical programs. This will allow us to reveal the common and differentiating features of the described projects. On the one hand, we have Cassirer, the heir to neo-Kantianism and the creator of symbolism, on the other, we are rooted in the tradition of reflective philosophy and phenomenological hermeneutics, Ricoeur. Despite many differences in epistemological assumptions, we can find similar positions in both philosophers.

The concurrence of the three Cassirerow base phenomena with three hermeneutic horizons manifests itself - as we will try to demonstrate - in the concept of the Work. The hermeneutic intuition of Cassirer turns into Ricoeur's reflection on self-understanding in the face of a work that affects our perception of the world and thinking about ourselves.
In the article, we will consider how the contemporary philosophy of culture developed by Cassirer is taken up by contemporary hermeneutics. Is the convergence of the three base phenomena with the three horizons that combine with each other in the process of interpretation in the juxtaposition of the philosophy of culture with contemporary hermeneutics? Do we have the right to compare Cassirerow's base phenomena, I - You -Work is with hermeneutic communication which is presented on the line Author (Creator) -Text (Work) - Reader (Receiver)?

References

Abel, O.; (2005/4). Le clos et l’ouvert. Ricoeur et le néokantisme de l’ « école de Paris », [w:] „Études théologiques et religieuses”, t. 80, Montpellier, s. 469-482.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/etr.0804.0469

Cassirer, E. (2001). GesammelteWerke. t. 24, Hamburg: Hamburger Ausgabe.
View in Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (2011). Logika nauk o kulturze, Kęty: Wyd. Marek Derewiecki.
View in Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1995-2011). NachgelasseneManuskripte und Texte, t. 1-11, Hamburg: Felix MeinerVerlag.
View in Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1996). On Basis Phenomena , [w:] Cassirer, E.; The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, t. 4, The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms, New Haven 1996: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. (1979). The Philosophy of History, [w:] Ricoeur, P.; Symbol, Myth, and Culture. Essays and Lectures of Ernst Cassirer, New Haven - New York: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W.; (1960). Maximen und Reflexionen, Berlin: Berliner Ausgabe.
View in Google Scholar

Grondin, J.; (2007). Wprowadzenie do hermeneutyki filozoficznej, Kraków: WAM.
View in Google Scholar

Hansson, J.; Nordin, S. (2006). Ernst Cassirer: The Swedish Years, Bern: Peter Lang.
View in Google Scholar

Jeanrond, W. G.; (1999). Hermeneutyka teologiczna. Rozwój i znaczenie, Kraków: WAM.
View in Google Scholar

Kaplita, M.; (2013). Autor, dzieło i czytelnik w świetle potrójnej mimesi Paula Ricoeura, [w:] Estetyka i Krytyka, nr 29, Kraków, s. 115-137.
View in Google Scholar

Konersmann, R.; (2009). Filozofia kultury. Wprowadzenie, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
View in Google Scholar

Krois, J. M.; (2012). Symbolisme et phénomènes de base (Basisphänomene), [w:] „Revue germaniqueinternationale”, nr 15, Paryż, s. 161-174.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rgi.1317

Krois, J. M.; (1995). Urworte - Cassirer also Goethe-Interpret [w:] Kulturkritik Nach Ernst Cassirer, Nr 1, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
View in Google Scholar

Kurata, T.; (2003). Poza ontologią: Paul Ricoeur i kwestia sztuki, [w:] „Sztuka i Filozofia”, t. 22/23, s. 51-63.
View in Google Scholar

Musioł, A.; (2010). Transcendentalna filozofia kultury Ernsta Cassirera – tradycja a współczesność, [w:] „Estetyka i Krytyka”, nr 2, s. 103-114.
View in Google Scholar

Naumann, B.; Recki, B.; (2002). Cassirer Und Goethe. NeueAspekteeinerphilosophisch – literarischen Wahlverwandtschaft, Berlin: AkademicVerlag.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050080833

Parszutowicz, P.; (2013). Fenomenologia form symbolicznych. Podstawowe pojęcia i inspiracje „późnej” filozofii Ernsta Cassirera, Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2008). Czas i opowieść, t. 1-3, Kraków: Wyd. UJ.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, New Haven: Yale University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1991). From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1989). Hermeneutyczna funkcja dystansu, [w:] Ricoeur, P.; Język, tekst, interpretacja, Warszawa: PIW.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2005) Refleksja dokonana. Autobiografia intelektualna, Kety: Wyd. ANTYK
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1974). The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1985). Konflikt hermeneutyk: epistemologia interpretacji, [w:] Ricoeur, P.: Egzystencja i hermeneutyka. Warszawa: PAX.
View in Google Scholar

Rosner, K., (2002). Paul Ricoeur wobec współczesnych dyskusji i narracji, [w:] „Teksty drugie”, nr 2, s. 129-136.
View in Google Scholar

Rosner, K., (1989). Paul Ricoeur – filozoficzne źródła jego hermeneutyki, [w:] Ricoeur, P.; Język, tekst, interpretacja, Warszawa: PIW.
View in Google Scholar

Simmel, G.; (2007). Pojęcie i tragedia kultury, [w:] Kultura i tragiczność. Wrocław: Wyd. UW.
View in Google Scholar

Weizsäcker, C. V.; (1937). Review of “Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik” by Ernst Cassirer, [w:] „Physikalische Zeitschrift”, nr 38.
View in Google Scholar

Wolicka, E.; (1995). Filozofia a nauka o literaturze. Paula Ricoeura próba nowej interpretacji kategorii mimesis, [w:] “Teksty Drugie”, nr 5, s. 62-81.
View in Google Scholar