Valuing Groundwater Quality in the Częstochowa Case Study (Poland)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1429-3730.53.03Keywords:
groundwater valuation, choice experiment, willingness to pay, groundwater qualityAbstract
This paper presents results of the study on preferences of inhabitants of the Częstochowa Region in Poland in the field of groundwater protection. The choice experiment (CE) method was applied, and willingness to pay (WTP) for improving groundwater quality through the development of sewerage systems was assessed. The results indicate that there is substantial WTP for water quality improvements. Households are willing to pay 18.25 PLN (4.43 EUR) per month to remain pollution at the maximum safe level according to EU regulations (reducing nitrate concentration in groundwater to 50 mg∙L-1). Our results add to the expanding literature on the valuation of water resources and can be useful in analysis of investment effectiveness, in the valuation of environmental costs and benefits related to improvement or deterioration of groundwater condition, and in the pricing policy debate in terms of fees and prices for water and water services.
References
Andreopoulos D., Damigos D., Comiti F., Fischer C., Estimating the Non-Market Benefits of Climate Change Adaptation of River Ecosystem Services: A Choice Experiment Application in the Aoos Basin, Greece, “Environmental Science & Policy” 2015, Vol. 45, pp. 92-103.
Google Scholar
Aulong S., Rinaudo J.-D., Assessing the Benefits of Different Groundwater Protection Levels. Results and Lessons Learnt from a Contingent Valuation Survey in the Upper Rhine Valley Aquifer, France, 13th IWRA World Water Congress 2008, Monpellier, France 2008.
Google Scholar
Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I., The Aggregation of Environmental Benefi t Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP, “Ecological Economics” 2006, Vol. 60, pp. 450–460.
Google Scholar
Bąk A., Mikroekonometryczne metody badania preferencji konsumentów z wykorzystaniem Programu R, C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2013.
Google Scholar
Birol E., Das S., Estimating the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment: The Case of River Ganga, India, “Journal of Environmental Management” 2010, Vol. 91, pp. 2163–2171.
Google Scholar
Birol E., Karousakis K., Koundouri P., Using Economic Valuation Techniques to Inform Water Resources Management: A Survey and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques and an Application, “Science of The Total Environment” 2006, Vol. 365, pp. 105–122.
Google Scholar
Brouwer R., Ordens C.M., Pinto R., Condesso de Melo M.T., Economic Valuation of Groundwater Protection Using a Groundwater Quality Ladder Based on Chemical Threshold Levels, “Ecological Indicators” 2018, Vol. 88, pp. 292–304.
Google Scholar
Che Y., Li W., Shang Z., Liu C., Yang K., Residential Preferences for River Network Improvement: An Exploration of Choice Experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China, “Environmental Management” 2014, Vol. 54, pp. 517–530.
Google Scholar
Christantoni M., Tentes G., Damigos D., Groundwater Valuation: Testing the Transferability of Secondary Values, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning and Economics, Grafima Publ, 2011.
Google Scholar
Czajkowski M., Bartczak A., Markiewicz O., Markowska A., Melichar J., Scasny M., Skopkova H., Lake Water Quality Valuation-Benefit Transfer Approach vs. Empirical Evidence, Ekonomia, 19 (2007), http://ekonomia.wne.uw.edu.pl/ekonomia/getFile/652 accessed: 29 June 2019
Google Scholar
Damigos D., Tentes G., Emmanouilidi V., Balzarini M., Carvalho T., Demonstrating Managed Aquifer Recharge as a Solution to Water Scarcity and Drought, Report of MARSOL Project Deliverable D15.3, 2016.
Google Scholar
Environmental Valuation in Developed Countries: Case Studies, ed. D.W. Pearce, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA 2006.
Google Scholar
Gruszczyński M., Bazyl M., Mikroekonometria: Modele i metody analizy danych indywidualnych, Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa 2012.
Google Scholar
Hasler B., Lundhede T., Martinsen L., Neye S., Schou J.S., Valuation of Groundwater Protection versus Water Treatment in Denmark by Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation, NERI Technical Report No. 543, 2005.
Google Scholar
Hérivaux C., Rinaudo J.-D., Integrated Assessment of Economic Benefits of Groundwater mprovement with Contingent Valuation, [in:] Integrated Groundwater Management, eds. A.J. Jakeman, O. Barreteau, R.J. Hunt, J.D. Rinaudo, A. Ross, Springer, Cham 2016.
Google Scholar
Hole A.R., A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures, University of York, Centre for Health Economics, CHE Research Paper 8, 2006.
Google Scholar
Informacje o stanie środowiska w województwie śląskim w 2014 roku, http://www.katowice.pios.gov.pl/index.php?tekst=monitoring/informacje/i accessed: 29 June 2019
Google Scholar
Informacje o stanie środowiska w województwie śląskim w 2015 roku, http://www.katowice.pios.gov.pl/index.php?tekst=monitoring/informacje/i accessed: 29 June 2019
Google Scholar
Kaczorowski Z., Malina G., Mizera J., Zintegrowany System Gospodarowania i Ochrony Zasobów Wodnych GZWP 326, Wodociągi Częstochowskie, Częstochowa 2007.
Google Scholar
Latinopoulos D., Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate the Social Benefits from Improved Water Supply Services, “Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences” 2014, Vol. 11, pp. 187–204.
Google Scholar
Logar I., Brouwer R., Maurer M., Ort C., Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Swiss National Policy on Reducing Micropollutants in Treated Wastewater, “Environmental Science & Technology” 2014, Vol. 48, pp. 12500–12508.
Google Scholar
Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., Covich A., Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey, “Ecological Economics” 2000, Vol. 33, pp. 103–117.
Google Scholar
Martínez-Paz J.M., Perni A., Environmental Cost of Groundwater: A Contingent Valuation Approach, “International Journal of Environmental Research” 2011, Vol. 5, pp. 603–612.
Google Scholar
Mizera J., Malina G., Groundwater Extraction Control for Protecting the Water Works in Łobodno (SW Poland) against Contamination with Nitrates, “Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego” 2010, Vol. 441, pp. 101–106.
Google Scholar
Nakano S., Nishimura K., Marginal Value Estimation for the Attributes of the Tameikes via Choice Experiment, “Water Resources Management” 2014, Vol. 28, pp. 61–85.
Google Scholar
Nijkamp P., Travisi C., Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Environmental Safety: Evidence from a Survey of Milan, Italy, Residents, FEEM Working Paper No. 100.04, 2004.
Google Scholar
Palak-Mazur D., Kostka A., Kuczyńska A., Ścibior K., Interpretacja wyników monitoringu operacyjnego, ocena stanu chemicznego oraz przygotowanie opracowania o stanie chemicznym jednolitych części wód podziemnych zagrożonych nieosiągnięciem dobrego stanu według danych z 2015 r., Raport, Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa 2016.
Google Scholar
Poe G.L., Valuation of Groundwater Quality Using a Contingent Valuation Damage Function Approach, “Water Resources Research” 1998, Vol. 34, pp. 3627–3633.
Google Scholar
Poe G.L., Bishop R.C., Valuing the Incremental Benefits of Groundwater Protection when Exposure Levels are Known, “Environmental and Resource Economics” 1999, Vol. 13, pp. 341–367.
Google Scholar
Poe G.L., Giraud K.L., Loomis J.B., Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions, “American Journal of Agricultural Economics” 2005, Vol. 87, pp. 353–365.
Google Scholar
Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation Services, OECD Studies on Water, OECD Publishing, 2010.
Google Scholar
Rodrigues L.C., Berghvan den J.C.J.M., Loureiro M.L., Nunes P.A.L.D., Rossi S., The Cost of Mediterranean Sea Warming and Acidification: A Choice Experiment Among Scuba Divers at Medes Islands, Spain, “Environmental and Resource Economics” 2016, Vol. 63, pp. 289–311.
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Tapia L., Revollo-Fernández D., Morales-Novelo J., Household’s Perception of Water Quality and Willingness to Pay for Clean Water in Mexico City, “Economies” 2017, Vol. 5, p. 12.
Google Scholar
Tempesta T., Vecchiato D., Riverscape and Groundwater Preservation: A Choice Experiment, “Environmental Management” 2013, Vol. 52, pp. 1487–1502.
Google Scholar
Tentes G., Damigos D., Discrete Choice Experiment for Groundwater Valuation: Case of the Asopos River Basin, Greece, “Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management” 2015, Vol. 141.
Google Scholar
Tentes G., Damigos D., The Lost Value of Groundwater: The Case of Asopos River Basin in Central Greece, “Water Resources Management” 2012, Vol. 26, pp. 147–164.
Google Scholar
Tussupova K., Berndtsson R., Bramryd T., Beisenova R., Investigating Willingness to Pay to Improve Water Supply Services: Application of Contingent Valuation Method, “Water” 2015, Vol. 7, pp. 3024–3039.
Google Scholar
Vásquez W.F., Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Work for Improvements of Municipal and Community-Managed Water Services, “Water Resources Research” 2014, Vol. 50, pp. 8002–8014.
Google Scholar
Vásquez W.F., Alicea-Planas J., Unbundling Household Preferences for Improved Sanitation: A Choice Experiment from an Urban Settlement in Nicaragua, “Journal of Environmental Management” 2018, Vol. 218, pp. 477–485.
Google Scholar
Vásquez W.F., Franceschi D., System Reliability and Water Service Decentralization: Investigating Household Preferences in Nicaragua, “Water Resources Management” 2013, Vol. 27, pp. 4913–4926.
Google Scholar
Vásquez W.F., Mozumder P., Hernández-Arce J., Berrens R.P., Willingness to Pay for Safe Drinking Water: Evidence from Parral, Mexico, “Journal of Environmental Management” 2009, Vol. 90, pp. 3391–3400.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.