System zarządzania treścią jako system zarządzania informacją w badaniach interdyscyplinarnych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.350.04Słowa kluczowe:
nauka zespołowa, system zarządzania treścią, oprogramowanie jako usługa, studium przypadkuAbstrakt
Zespoły badawcze coraz częściej zastępują niezależnych badaczy. W ciągu 19 lat wielkość zespołu badawczego wzrosła o 50%. Lepsza współpraca między członkami zespołu badawczego może poprawić wyniki badań lub produkt projektu badawczo‑rozwojowego. W zespole badawczym wiedza – jeżeli jest tworzona wspólnie – musi być skutecznie przekazywana i rozpowszechniona między wszystkich jego członków. Współpraca badaczy może być z powodzeniem wspierana przez zapewnienie odpowiedniego środowiska wymiany wiedzy i udogodnień komunikacyjnych. Celem tego artykułu jest przedstawienie sposobu dzielenia się informacją w zespole badawczym przy wykorzystaniu systemu zarządzania treścią (CMS), działającego na podstawie rozwiązania chmurowego w modelu oprogramowania jako usługi (SaaS). Przedstawiono w nim także wykorzystanie CMS do wsparcia współpracy zespołu badawczego realizującego projekt badawczy finansowany przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981–1999, “Research Policy”, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.014
Alsayed M. H., Dahlan H. M., Hussin A. C. (2012), Knowledge sharing in collaborative research activities, “Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation”, vol. 2, pp. 1–8.
Anatan L. (2015), Conceptual Issues in University to Industry Knowledge Transfer Studies: A Literature Review, “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, vol. 211, pp. 711–717, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815054300 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.090
Baran M., Strojny J. (2013), Kompleksowe podejście do zarządzania projektami na przykładzie uczelni wyższej, “Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie”, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 247–262.
Bekkers R., Bodas Freitas I. M. (2008), Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, “Research Policy”, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1837–1853, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001558 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Benlian A., Hess T. (2011), Opportunities and risks of software‑as‑a‑service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.07.007
Boiko B. (2001), Understanding Content Management, “Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.221
Chandra P., Dong A. (2018), The relation between knowledge accumulation and technical value in interdisciplinary technologies, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 128, pp. 235–244, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517301397 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.006
Chard K., Lidman M., McCollam B., Bryan J., Ananthakrishnan R., Tuecke S., Foster I. (2016), Globus Nexus: A Platform‑as‑a‑Service provider of research identity, profile, and group management, “Future Generation Computer Systems”, vol. 56, pp. 571–583, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X1500285X [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.006
Charte F., Rivera A. J., Charte D., Jesus M. J. del, Herrera F. (2018), Tips, guidelines and tools for managing multi‑label datasets: The mldr.datasets R package and the Cometa data repository, “Neurocomputing”, vol. 289, pp. 68–85, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231218301401 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.02.011
Chau V. S., Gilman M., Serbanica C. (2017), Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 199–209, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516000792 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.013
Chou D. C., Chou A. Y. (2007), Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: Software‑as‑a‑service business model, “International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management”, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 392–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2007.017385
Claps G. G., Berntsson Svensson R., Aurum A. (2015), On the journey to continuous deployment: Technical and social challenges along the way, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 57, pp. 21–31, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914001694 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.009
Cockburn A. (2006), Agile Software Development, The cooperative game, second edition, 2nd ed., Anonymous Pearson Education, Boston.
Dave B., Koskela L. (2009), Collaborative knowledge management – A construction case study, “Automation in Construction”, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 894–902, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580509000545 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.03.015
Drury‑Grogan M. L., Conboy K., Acton T. (2017), Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 131, pp. 248–265, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217301103 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.003
Dyer W., Wilkins A. (1991), Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 613–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279492
Falk‑Krzesinski H. J., Börner K., Contractor N., Fiore S.M., Hall K. L., Keyton J., Spring B., Stokols D., Trochim W., Uzzi B. (2010), Advancing the Science of Team Science, “Clinical and Translational Science”, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 263–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00223.x
Fergusson K. (2016), How Universities Use Atlassian Confluence, https://blog.seibert-media.com/2016/08/05/how-universities-use-atlassian-confluence/ [accessed: 27.06.2018].
Feuerlicht G., Snášel V., Szczepaniak P., Abraham A., Kacprzyk J. (2010), Next generation SOA: Can SOA survive cloud computing?, “Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering”, vol. 2, pp. 19–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10687-3_2
Figueiredo M. S.N., Pereira A. M. (2017), Managing Knowledge – The Importance of Databases in the Scientific Production, “Procedia Manufacturing”, vol. 12, pp. 166–173, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917306108 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.021
Fox J., Gutenstein M., Khan O., South M., Thomson R. (2015), OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare, “Computers in Industry”, vol. 66, pp. 63–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.001
Goode S., Lin C., Tsai J. C., Jiang J. J. (2015), Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) providers, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 70, pp. 73–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.12.005
Gray P. H. (2000), The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research mode, “The Journal of Strategic Information Systems”, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 175–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00040-8
Hall K. L., Feng A. X., Moser R. P., Stokols D., Taylor B. K. (2008), Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S243–S249, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379708004169 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007
Hawedi M., Talhi C., Boucheneb H. (2018), Security as a Service for Public Cloud Tenants (SaaS), “Procedia Computer Science”, vol. 130, pp. 1025–1030, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050918305052 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.143
Hesse B. W. (2008), Of Mice and Mentors. Developing Cyber‑Infrastructure to Support Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S235–S239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.011
Huang M., Chen D. (2017), How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved?, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 210–215, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300130 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.024
Kim W. (2009), Cloud computing: Today and Tomorrow, “Journal of Object Technology”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2009.8.1.c4
Kim W., Lee J. H., Hong C., Han C., Lee H., Jang B. (2012), An innovative method for data and software integration in SaaS, “Computers and Mathematics with Applications”, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1252–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.069
Laleci G. B., Aluc G., Dogac A., Sinaci A., Kilic O., Tuncer F. (2010), A semantic backend for content management systems, “Knowledge‑Based Systems”, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 832–843, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705110000894 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.05.008
Lamming M., Eldridge M., Flynn M., Jones C., Pendlebury D. (2000), Satchel: Providing access to any document, anytime, anywhere, “ACM Transactions on Computer‑Human Interaction”, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 322–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/355324.355326
Laukkarinen T., Kuusinen K., Mikkonen T. (2018), Regulated software meets DevOps, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 97, pp. 176–178, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584918300144 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.01.011
Lethbridge T. C., Sim S. E., Singer J. (2005), Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x
Mann K. J., Murphy T. E., Wilson N., West M. (2018), Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3872863/magic‑quadrant‑for‑enterprise‑agile‑planning‑tools [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Matejun M., Szczepańczyk M. (2009), Komunikacja w zespołach projektowych – studium przypadku, [in:] A. Adamik, S. Lachiewicz (eds.), Współpraca w rozwoju współczesnych organizacji, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź, pp. 230–242.
McCutcheon D. M., Meredith J. R. (1993), Conducting case study research in operations management, “Journal of Operations Management”, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 239–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
Melchor‑Ferrer E., Buendía‑Carrillo D. (2016), Web‑based system to improve resource efficiency in university departments, “Journal of Cases on Information Technology”, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2016010101
Nakata N., Fukuda Y., Fukuda K., Suzuki N. (2005), DICOM Wiki: Web‑based collaboration and knowledge database system for radiologists, “International Congress Series”, vol. 1281, pp. 980–985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.03.327
National Research Council (2015), Enhancing the effectiveness of team science, National Academies Press, Washington.
Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki C. C., Konno N. (1994), Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test, “International Business Review”, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 337–351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0969593194900272 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(94)90027-2
Park S. H., Ungson G. R. (2001), Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure, “Organization Science”, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118
Pérez‑Montoro M. (2011), Theoretical perspectives on content management, [in:] N. Ferrer, J. Alfonso (eds.), Content management for e‑learning, Springer, New York, pp. 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6959-0_1
Pinho C., Franco M., Mendes L. (2018), Web portals as tools to support information management in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review, “International Journal of Information Management”, vol. 41, pp. 80–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.04.002
Portillo‑Rodríguez J., Vizcaíno A., Piattini M., Beecham S. (2014), Using agents to manage Socio‑Technical Congruence in a Global Software Engineering project, “Information Sciences”, vol. 264, pp. 230–259, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514000152 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.009
Rola P. (2018), Identyfikacja czynników sukcesu i porażki projektów badawczych, https://docs.cyfronet.pl/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=19367661 [accessed: 10.10.2018].
Rola P.M., Kuchta D., Kopczyk D. (2016), Conceptual model of working space for Agile (Scrum) project team, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 118, pp. 49–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.071
Runeson P., Host M. (2008), Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8
Ryńca R., Kuchta D. (2011), Transfer wiedzy i technologii w polskim szkolnictwie wyższym, “Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu”, no. 22, pp. 87–100.
Scandura A. (2016), University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort, “Research Policy”, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1907–1922, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316301068 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009
Sittig D. F., Wright A., Simonaitis L., Carpenter J. D., Allen G. O., Doebbeling B. N., Sirajuddin A. M., Ash J. S., Middleton B. (2010), The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: An inventory of tools and techniques, “International Journal of Medical Informatics”, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 44–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.09.003
Stanford University (2017), Confluence, https://uit.stanford.edu/service/confluence [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Stokols D., Hall K. L., Taylor B. K., Moser R. P. (2008), The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S77–S89, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937970800408X [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
Svärd P. (2017), 3 – Enterprise content management (ECM), [in:] P. Svärd (ed.), Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst e‑Government Development, Chandos Publishing, Hull, pp. 25–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100874-4.00003-X
Uniwersytet Jagielloński (2018), Confluence, https://jakosc.uj.edu.pl/pl_PL/-s-strefy/dla-pelnomocnika/ogloszenia?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_70pHsaH66GE2&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column–2&p_p_col_pos=2&p_p_colcount=3&groupId=1609422&articleId=30661315 [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Uniwersytet Warszawski (2018), Uniwersytet Warszawski: System Dashboard, https://it.jira.uw.edu.pl/ [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009), Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos, “New Media & Society”, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 855–874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105356
Wilkin J. (2013), Finansowanie nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Wybrane problemy i postulowane kierunki reform, “Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych”, vol. 3, no. 35, pp. 51–70.
Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. (2007), The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, “Science”, vol. 316, no. 5827, pp. 1036–1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Yli‑Huumo J., Maglyas A., Smolander K. (2016), How do software development teams manage technical debt? – An empirical study, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 120, pp. 195–218, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121630053X [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.018
Zavale N. C., Macamo E. (2016), How and what knowledge do universities and academics transfer to industry in African low‑income countries? Evidence from the stage of university‑industry linkages in Mozambique, “International Journal of Educational Development”, vol. 49, pp. 247–261, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059316300384 [accessed: 30.05.2018]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.04.001
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Jak cytować
