Returns to Scale for EU Regions – evidence from the spatial panel model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.329.02Keywords:
increasing returns to scale, productivity growth, Verdoorn’s law, spatial panelAbstract
Recent findings emphasise the importance of localised returns to scale for the regional growth as well as for the agglomeration processes. However, it is still not well established whether returns to scale are constant or increasing, and to what extent. Therefore, in this study we apply specification which describes the productivity growth with the growth of output through the Verdoorn’s law. This study aims to provide some new estimates of the degree of returns to scale for EU regions. Our findings show that the hypothesis of increasing returns to scale is still valid in today’s EU economy. To test the hypothesis, we have employed the Multidimensional Spatial Panel Durbin Model with Spatial Fixed Effects. The research is conducted for 261 regions of the EU 28. The paper concludes that increasing returns to scale in EU regions are substantial.
Downloads
References
Angeriz A., Mccombie J., Roberts M. (2006), Productivity, Efficiency And Technological Change In European Union Regional Manufacturing A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach, “The Manchester School”, no. 74(4), pp. 500–525.
Google Scholar
Anselin L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Google Scholar
Bernat G.A. (1996), Does Manufacturing Matter. A Spatial Econometric View of Kaldor’s Laws, “Journal of Regional Science”, no. 36, pp. 463–477.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B. (2001), Equilibrium and economic growth: spatial econometric models and simulations, “Journal of Regional Science”, no. 41, pp.117–147.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B. (2003), Increasing returns: evidence from local wage rates in Great Britain, “Oxford Economic Papers”, no. 55, pp. 716–739.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B. (2004), Some alternative geo‑economics for Europe’s regions, “Journal of Economic Geography”, no. 4, pp. 389–420.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B. (2006), The new economic geography versus urban economics: an evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain, “Oxford Econ Papers”, no. 58, pp. 501–530.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B. (2007), A multi‑equation spatial econometric model, with application to EU manufacturing productivity growth, “Journal of Geographical Systems”, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119–144.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B., López‑Bazo E. (2006), Empirical growth models with spatial effects, “Papers in Regional Science”, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 177–198.
Google Scholar
Fingleton B., McCombie J.S.L. (1998), Increasing returns and economic growth: Some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions, “Oxford Economic Papers”, no. 50, pp. 89–105.
Google Scholar
Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. (1999), The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, MIT Press Books, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database [accessed: 15.10.2015].
Google Scholar
Kaldor N. (1957), A Model of Economic Growth, “Economic Journal”, no. 67, pp. 591–624.
Google Scholar
Olejnik A. (2014), Prospects and frontiers of Multidimensional Panel Spatial Autoregressive Models, “Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu”, no. 334, pp. 160–169.
Google Scholar
Olejnik A., Özyurt S. (2016), Introducing Multidimensional Spatial Weight Matrices into Spatial Autoregressive Models, European Central Bank Working Papers.
Google Scholar
Paelinck J.H. (2013), Some challenges for spatial econometricians, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica. Spatial Econometrics and Regional Economics Analysis”, no. 292, pp. 11–20.
Google Scholar
Verdoorn P.J. (1949), Fattori che Regolano lo Sviluppo della Produttivita del Lavoro, “L’Industria”, no. 1, pp. 3–10.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
