The financial and non‑financial performance indicators in strategic reports of companies from the UK – relevance from the perspective of socially responsible investors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.327.04

Keywords:

key performance indicators, strategic report, socially responsible investment

Abstract

The article aims to investigate which performance indicators are revealed in strategic reports of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange whether they can constitute relevant source of information to evaluate companies for investors using socially responsible investment strategies. The research method used in the article is content analysis of 60 reports of companies included in the FTSE techMARK. The research results indicate that the strategic report is a potentially relevant source of information for investors using ESG integration and commitment strategies, that dominate in the UK. Non‑financial KPI, disclosed in strategic reports, are often leading indicators and may facilitate the preparation of forecasts of future profits and cash flows of companies by investors. They also help in the creation and adjustments of investment portfolios by investors using socially responsible investment strategies.
Usefulness of strategic reports for socially responsible investors is, however, limited by different format of the presented data and the relatively high variety of indicators, that makes them difficult to compare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer R., Koedijk K., Otten R. (2005), International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style, „Journal of Banking and Finance”, vol. 29(7), s. 1751–1767.
Google Scholar

Berry T.C., Junkus J.C. (2013), Socially responsible investing: An investor perspective, „Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 112(4), s. 707–720.
Google Scholar

Brammer S., Brooks C., Pavelin S. (2006), Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures, „Financial Management”, vol. 35(3), s. 97–116.
Google Scholar

Capelle-Blancard G., Monjon S. (2012), Trends in the literature on socially responsible investment: Looking for the keys under the lamppost, „Business Ethics: A European Review”, vol. 21, s. 239–250.
Google Scholar

Czerwonka M. (2013), Inwestowanie społecznie odpowiedzialne, Difin, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Duuren E. van, Plantinga A., Scholtens B. (2016), ESG integration and the investment management process: fundamental investing reinvented, „Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 138(3), s. 525–533.
Google Scholar

Dziawgo L. (2010), Zielony rynek finansowy. Ekologiczna ewolucja rynku finansowego, PWE, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Eurosif (2014), European SRI Study 2014, http://www.eurosif.org/wp‑content/uploads/2014/09/Eurosif‑SRI‑Study‑20142.pdf [dostęp: 1.03.2016].
Google Scholar

FRC (2014), Guidance on the Strategic Report, https://frc.org.uk/Our‑Work/Publications/Account­ing‑and‑Reporting‑Policy/Guidance‑on‑the‑Strategic‑Report.pdf [dostęp: 15.03.2016].
Google Scholar

Friedman A.L., Miles S. (2001). Socially responsible investment and corporate social and environmental reporting in the UK: an exploratory study, „The British Accounting Review”, vol. 33(4), s. 523–548.
Google Scholar

Holland J. (1998), Private disclosure and financial reporting, „Accounting and Business Research”, vol. 28(4), s. 255–269.
Google Scholar

Humphrey J.E., Tan D.T. (2014), Does it really hurt to be responsible?, „Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 122, s. 375–386.
Google Scholar

Kaplan R.S., Norton D. (2001), Strategiczna karta wyników – Jak przełożyć strategię na działania, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Luther R.G., Matatko J., Corner D.C. (1992), The investment performance of UK „ethical” Unit Trusts, „Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal”, vol. 5(4), s. 57–70.
Google Scholar

Michalak J. (2008), Pomiar dokonań. Od wyniku finansowego do Balanced Scorecard, Difin, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Nilsson J. (2008), Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behaviour, „Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 83, s. 307–325.
Google Scholar

Pogodzińska‑Mizdrak E. (2010), Koncepcje społecznie odpowiedzialnego gospodarowania i inwestowania szansą rozwoju rachunkowości, „Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości”, t. 56, s. 175–184.
Google Scholar

Rogowski W., Ulianiuk A. (2012), Społecznie odpowiedzialne inwestowanie (SRI) – próba charakterystyki, „Studia Prace Kolegium Zarządzania”, nr 114, s. 64–81.
Google Scholar

Rosen B.N., Sandler D.M., Shani D. (1991), Social issues and socially responsible investment behavior: A preliminary empirical investigation, „Journal of Consumer Affairs”, vol. 25(2), s. 221–234.
Google Scholar

Sandberg J., Juravle C., Hedesström T.D., Hamilton I. (2009), The heterogeneity of socially responsible investment, „Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 87, s. 519–533.
Google Scholar

Sobańska I. (2003), Problemy rachunkowości zarządczej w grupie kapitałowej – nowy obszar badawczy, „Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości”, t. 17, s. 110–120.
Google Scholar

Urban D. (2011), Zarys koncepcji inwestowania społecznie odpowiedzialnego, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, nr 261, s. 495–507.
Google Scholar

Published

2017-07-11

How to Cite

Michalak, J. (2017). The financial and non‑financial performance indicators in strategic reports of companies from the UK – relevance from the perspective of socially responsible investors. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(327), [59]-74. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.327.04

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.