A Content Management System as an Information Management System in Interdisciplinary Research

Authors

  • Paweł Rola Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Management Department of Management Systems https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5858-629X
  • Dorota Kuchta Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Management Department of Management Systems https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-0759

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.350.04

Keywords:

team science, content management system, software‑as‑a‑service, case study

Abstract

Teams of scientific specialists have replaced independent researchers, simultaneously the research team size has increased by 50% over the 19‑year period. Better collaborations between project team members might improve research outcomes or R&D project products. Knowledge needs to be communicated among a research team effectively and shared among all research team members as it is created collaboratively. Collaboration can be successfully supported by providing a knowledge sharing environment and communication facilities. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility and discuss novel communication among scientists using a content management system (CMS) which operates based on the Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) cloud‑computing model. This study presents the use of CMS for the collaboration of a research team carrying out a research project funded by the Polish National Science Centre.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981–1999, “Research Policy”, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–285.
Google Scholar

Alsayed M. H., Dahlan H. M., Hussin A. C. (2012), Knowledge sharing in collaborative research activities, “Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation”, vol. 2, pp. 1–8.
Google Scholar

Anatan L. (2015), Conceptual Issues in University to Industry Knowledge Transfer Studies: A Literature Review, “Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, vol. 211, pp. 711–717, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815054300 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Baran M., Strojny J. (2013), Kompleksowe podejście do zarządzania projektami na przykładzie uczelni wyższej, “Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie”, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 247–262.
Google Scholar

Bekkers R., Bodas Freitas I. M. (2008), Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, “Research Policy”, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1837–1853, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001558 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Benlian A., Hess T. (2011), Opportunities and risks of software‑as‑a‑service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232–246.
Google Scholar

Boiko B. (2001), Understanding Content Management, “Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8–13.
Google Scholar

Chandra P., Dong A. (2018), The relation between knowledge accumulation and technical value in interdisciplinary technologies, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 128, pp. 235–244, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517301397 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Chard K., Lidman M., McCollam B., Bryan J., Ananthakrishnan R., Tuecke S., Foster I. (2016), Globus Nexus: A Platform‑as‑a‑Service provider of research identity, profile, and group management, “Future Generation Computer Systems”, vol. 56, pp. 571–583, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X1500285X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Charte F., Rivera A. J., Charte D., Jesus M. J. del, Herrera F. (2018), Tips, guidelines and tools for managing multi‑label datasets: The mldr.datasets R package and the Cometa data repository, “Neurocomputing”, vol. 289, pp. 68–85, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231218301401 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Chau V. S., Gilman M., Serbanica C. (2017), Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 199–209, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516000792 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Chou D. C., Chou A. Y. (2007), Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: Software‑as‑a‑service business model, “International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management”, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 392–405.
Google Scholar

Claps G. G., Berntsson Svensson R., Aurum A. (2015), On the journey to continuous deployment: Technical and social challenges along the way, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 57, pp. 21–31, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914001694 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Cockburn A. (2006), Agile Software Development, The cooperative game, second edition, 2nd ed., Anonymous Pearson Education, Boston.
Google Scholar

Dave B., Koskela L. (2009), Collaborative knowledge management – A construction case study, “Automation in Construction”, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 894–902, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580509000545 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Drury‑Grogan M. L., Conboy K., Acton T. (2017), Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 131, pp. 248–265, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217301103 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Dyer W., Wilkins A. (1991), Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 613–619.
Google Scholar

Falk‑Krzesinski H. J., Börner K., Contractor N., Fiore S.M., Hall K. L., Keyton J., Spring B., Stokols D., Trochim W., Uzzi B. (2010), Advancing the Science of Team Science, “Clinical and Translational Science”, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 263–266.
Google Scholar

Fergusson K. (2016), How Universities Use Atlassian Confluence, https://blog.seibert-media.com/2016/08/05/how-universities-use-atlassian-confluence/ [accessed: 27.06.2018].
Google Scholar

Feuerlicht G., Snášel V., Szczepaniak P., Abraham A., Kacprzyk J. (2010), Next generation SOA: Can SOA survive cloud computing?, “Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering”, vol. 2, pp. 19–29.
Google Scholar

Figueiredo M. S.N., Pereira A. M. (2017), Managing Knowledge – The Importance of Databases in the Scientific Production, “Procedia Manufacturing”, vol. 12, pp. 166–173, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917306108 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Fox J., Gutenstein M., Khan O., South M., Thomson R. (2015), OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare, “Computers in Industry”, vol. 66, pp. 63–72.
Google Scholar

Goode S., Lin C., Tsai J. C., Jiang J. J. (2015), Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) providers, “Decision Support Systems”, vol. 70, pp. 73–85.
Google Scholar

Gray P. H. (2000), The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research mode, “The Journal of Strategic Information Systems”, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 175–191.
Google Scholar

Hall K. L., Feng A. X., Moser R. P., Stokols D., Taylor B. K. (2008), Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S243–S249, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379708004169 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Hawedi M., Talhi C., Boucheneb H. (2018), Security as a Service for Public Cloud Tenants (SaaS), “Procedia Computer Science”, vol. 130, pp. 1025–1030, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050918305052 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Hesse B. W. (2008), Of Mice and Mentors. Developing Cyber‑Infrastructure to Support Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S235–S239.
Google Scholar

Huang M., Chen D. (2017), How can academic innovation performance in university–industry collaboration be improved?, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 123, pp. 210–215, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300130 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Kim W. (2009), Cloud computing: Today and Tomorrow, “Journal of Object Technology”, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–72.
Google Scholar

Kim W., Lee J. H., Hong C., Han C., Lee H., Jang B. (2012), An innovative method for data and software integration in SaaS, “Computers and Mathematics with Applications”, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1252–1258.
Google Scholar

Laleci G. B., Aluc G., Dogac A., Sinaci A., Kilic O., Tuncer F. (2010), A semantic backend for content management systems, “Knowledge‑Based Systems”, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 832–843, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705110000894 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Lamming M., Eldridge M., Flynn M., Jones C., Pendlebury D. (2000), Satchel: Providing access to any document, anytime, anywhere, “ACM Transactions on Computer‑Human Interaction”, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 322–352.
Google Scholar

Laukkarinen T., Kuusinen K., Mikkonen T. (2018), Regulated software meets DevOps, “Information and Software Technology”, vol. 97, pp. 176–178, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584918300144 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Lethbridge T. C., Sim S. E., Singer J. (2005), Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–341.
Google Scholar

Mann K. J., Murphy T. E., Wilson N., West M. (2018), Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3872863/magic‑quadrant‑for‑enterprise‑agile‑planning‑tools [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar

Matejun M., Szczepańczyk M. (2009), Komunikacja w zespołach projektowych – studium przypadku, [in:] A. Adamik, S. Lachiewicz (eds.), Współpraca w rozwoju współczesnych organizacji, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź, pp. 230–242.
Google Scholar

McCutcheon D. M., Meredith J. R. (1993), Conducting case study research in operations management, “Journal of Operations Management”, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 239–256.
Google Scholar

Melchor‑Ferrer E., Buendía‑Carrillo D. (2016), Web‑based system to improve resource efficiency in university departments, “Journal of Cases on Information Technology”, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
Google Scholar

Nakata N., Fukuda Y., Fukuda K., Suzuki N. (2005), DICOM Wiki: Web‑based collaboration and knowledge database system for radiologists, “International Congress Series”, vol. 1281, pp. 980–985.
Google Scholar

National Research Council (2015), Enhancing the effectiveness of team science, National Academies Press, Washington.
Google Scholar

Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki C. C., Konno N. (1994), Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test, “International Business Review”, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 337–351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0969593194900272 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Park S. H., Ungson G. R. (2001), Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure, “Organization Science”, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–53.
Google Scholar

Pérez‑Montoro M. (2011), Theoretical perspectives on content management, [in:] N. Ferrer, J. Alfonso (eds.), Content management for e‑learning, Springer, New York, pp. 3–26.
Google Scholar

Pinho C., Franco M., Mendes L. (2018), Web portals as tools to support information management in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review, “International Journal of Information Management”, vol. 41, pp. 80–92.
Google Scholar

Portillo‑Rodríguez J., Vizcaíno A., Piattini M., Beecham S. (2014), Using agents to manage Socio‑Technical Congruence in a Global Software Engineering project, “Information Sciences”, vol. 264, pp. 230–259, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514000152 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Rola P. (2018), Identyfikacja czynników sukcesu i porażki projektów badawczych, https://docs.cyfronet.pl/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=19367661 [accessed: 10.10.2018].
Google Scholar

Rola P.M., Kuchta D., Kopczyk D. (2016), Conceptual model of working space for Agile (Scrum) project team, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 118, pp. 49–63.
Google Scholar

Runeson P., Host M. (2008), Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, “Empirical Software Engineering”, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–164.
Google Scholar

Ryńca R., Kuchta D. (2011), Transfer wiedzy i technologii w polskim szkolnictwie wyższym, “Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu”, no. 22, pp. 87–100.
Google Scholar

Scandura A. (2016), University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort, “Research Policy”, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1907–1922, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316301068 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Sittig D. F., Wright A., Simonaitis L., Carpenter J. D., Allen G. O., Doebbeling B. N., Sirajuddin A. M., Ash J. S., Middleton B. (2010), The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: An inventory of tools and techniques, “International Journal of Medical Informatics”, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 44–57.
Google Scholar

Stanford University (2017), Confluence, https://uit.stanford.edu/service/confluence [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar

Stokols D., Hall K. L., Taylor B. K., Moser R. P. (2008), The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement, “American Journal of Preventive Medicine”, vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S77–S89, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937970800408X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Svärd P. (2017), 3 – Enterprise content management (ECM), [in:] P. Svärd (ed.), Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst e‑Government Development, Chandos Publishing, Hull, pp. 25–33.
Google Scholar

Uniwersytet Jagielloński (2018), Confluence, https://jakosc.uj.edu.pl/pl_PL/-s-strefy/dla-pelnomocnika/ogloszenia?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_70pHsaH66GE2&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column–2&p_p_col_pos=2&p_p_colcount=3&groupId=1609422&articleId=30661315 [accessed: 26.06.2018].
Google Scholar

Uniwersytet Warszawski (2018), Uniwersytet Warszawski: System Dashboard, https://it.jira.uw.edu.pl/ [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009), Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos, “New Media & Society”, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 855–874.
Google Scholar

Wilkin J. (2013), Finansowanie nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Wybrane problemy i postulowane kierunki reform, “Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych”, vol. 3, no. 35, pp. 51–70.
Google Scholar

Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. (2007), The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, “Science”, vol. 316, no. 5827, pp. 1036–1039.
Google Scholar

Yli‑Huumo J., Maglyas A., Smolander K. (2016), How do software development teams manage technical debt? – An empirical study, “Journal of Systems and Software”, vol. 120, pp. 195–218, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121630053X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Zavale N. C., Macamo E. (2016), How and what knowledge do universities and academics transfer to industry in African low‑income countries? Evidence from the stage of university‑industry linkages in Mozambique, “International Journal of Educational Development”, vol. 49, pp. 247–261, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059316300384 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

Rola, P., & Kuchta, D. (2020). A Content Management System as an Information Management System in Interdisciplinary Research. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 5(350), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.350.04

Issue

Section

Articles