The Role of Relations with Suppliers in the Creation of Sustainable Supply Chain – Practical Examples

Agata Rudnicka Reichel

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.335.06

Authors

Agata Rudnicka Reichel University of Łódź, Faculty of Management, Department of Logistics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.335.06

Keywords:

sustainability, supply chain, relationships management, sustainable supply chain, maturity, maturity model

Abstract

There are many factors that may have an influence on the method by which a supply chain is managed and the way the relationships among all its links are developed. Sustainability, as a complex and challenging concept, affects the approach to establishing and maintaining relations, extending their scope and scale. Next to the traditional understanding of relations in a supply chain, additional goals emerge, resulting in both positive effects and challenges which its different links need to face. The concept of sustainability means that a business organisation takes on shared responsibility for the whole supply chain to achieve its long‑term goals. Relationships are an important factor affecting the ability to create and manage a sustainable supply chain. Relationship Management seems to be the basis for the creation of a stable and continuous chain which presents characteristics of maturity. The aim of the article is to introduce the issue of maturity which determines the degree of achievement of sustainable development objectives in a supply chain. A case study based on the author’s own research will be presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Agata Rudnicka Reichel, University of Łódź, Faculty of Management, Department of Logistics

Agata Rudnicka is Assistant professor in Department of Operational Processes Improvement /Logistics at the University of Lodz. Her main field of interests are:CSR, sustainable development, business ethics, environmental management and social and environmental aspects of supply chain management. She has got 9 years’ experience in teaching, research and business consulting in these areas. Certified project manager and tutor. Coordinator and team member of national and international projects related to the issue of sustainable development and social economy.

References

Baumgartner R., Ebner D. (2010), Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels, “Sustainable Development”, vol. 18, pp. 76–89.
Google Scholar

Buysse K., Verbeke A. (2003), Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective, “Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 453–470.
Google Scholar

Clarkson M.E. (1995), A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 92–117.
Google Scholar

Croxton K.L., García‑Dastugue S.J., Lambert D.M., Rogers D.S. (2001), The Supply Chain Management Processes, “The International Journal of Logistics Management”, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 13–36.
Google Scholar

Daozhi Z., Liang Z., Xin L., Jianyong S. (2006), A New Supply Chain Maturity Model With 3‑Dimension Perspective, ITIC – Proceedings of Information Technology and Innovation Conference, Hangzhou.
Google Scholar

Done A. (2011), Developing supply chain maturity, Working Paper 898, Business School, University of Navarra.
Google Scholar

Elkington J. (1998), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century, New Society Publishers, Stoney Creek.
Google Scholar

Frederico G. (2017), Supply Chain Management Maturity: A Comprehensive Framework Proposal for Literature Review and Case Studies, “International Business Research”, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 68–77.
Google Scholar

Hakansson H., Ford D. (2002), How should companies interact in business networks?, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 55, pp. 133–139.
Google Scholar

Kumar D., Rahman Z. (2015), Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework, “International Strategic Management Review”, vol. 3, pp. 110–127.
Google Scholar

Kurnia S., Rahim M., Samson D., Singh P. (2014), Sustainable Supply Chain Management Capability Maturity: Framework Development and Initial Evaluation, Research In Progress, Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv 2014, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.670.5294&rep=rep1&type=pdf [accessed: 1.12.2016].
Google Scholar

Leppelt T., Foerstl K., Reuter C., Hartmann E. (2013), Sustainability management beyond organizational boundaries sustainable supplier relationship management in the chemical industry, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 56, pp. 94–102.
Google Scholar

Moeller S., Fassnacht M., Klose S. (2006), A Framework for Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), “Journal of Business‑to‑Business Marketing”, vol. 13(4), pp. 256–270.
Google Scholar

Ocicka B., Raźniewska M. (2015), Rola budowania relacji partnerskich z kluczowymi dostawcami w zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw, “Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach”, no. 249, pp. 63–72.
Google Scholar

Porteous A.H., Rammohan S.V., Cohen S., Hau L., Lee H.L. (2012), Maturity in Responsible Supply Chain Management, A white paper, Stanford University, Global Supply Chain Management Forum, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/publication‑pdf/white‑paper‑maturity‑responsible‑supply‑chain‑management.pdf [accessed: 1.12.2016].
Google Scholar

Reefke H., Sundaram D., Ahmed M.D. (2010), Maturity Progression Model for Sustainable Supply Chains, “Advanced Manufacturing and Sustainable Logistics”, vol. 46, pp. 308–319.
Google Scholar

Rudnicka A. (2016), How to manage sustainable supply chain? The issue of maturity, “LogForum”, no. 12(4), pp. 203–211.
Google Scholar

Rudnicka A. (2017), Sustainable supply chain maturity model, “Research in Logistics & Production”, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 201–209.
Google Scholar

Schiele H. (2007), Supply‑management maturity, cost savings and purchasing absorptive capacity: testing the procurement – performance link, “Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management”, vol. 13(4), pp. 274–293.
Google Scholar