Quantification of the Size of Local Public Administration: Empirical Study of Polish Regions

Tomasz Skica; Ondřej Dvouletý

doi:10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.05

Authors

Tomasz Skica Department of Finance, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, The Institute for Financial Research and Analyses in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35–225 Rzeszów, Poland
Ondřej Dvouletý Department of Entrepreneurship, University of Economics in Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.05

Keywords:

size of local administration, local government, measurement of government size, bureaucracy size

Abstract

The issue of the size of public administration is commonly researched. Most of the times this topic is tackled from a macroeconomic perspective, considering local and central administration together. That is why this paper uniquely takes on the local perspective only, analysing the size of local government (i.e. size of public administration at the local level) in Polish regions during the period of 2009–2013. Based on the existing literature, we chose five variables of the size of local administration at the commune level connected with employment and reflecting costs related to the functioning of local administration structures. All indicators were expressed per capita. With the usage of ANOVA, we proved significant differences in the size of public administration across regions for all variables. To compare the size of local governments across regions, we ranked all variables individually, and then we calculated the average ranking for all variables. Our findings have clear implications for policy makers, providing information about the regions with the biggest/smallest size of public administration at the local level. Our study suggests simple and accessible tool for continuous reporting on the size of public administration in order to monitor costs also in the upcoming years. The results of the monitoring could also be used for the establishment of an incentive program for regional policy representatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonso, A. and Jalles, J. T. (2016), ‘Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality’, Empirica, 43 (1), pp. 83–109.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9294-2

Anderson, J. E. (2012), Public finance, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar

Andrews, R. and Boyne, G. A. (2009), ‘Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities’, Urban Studies, 46 (4), pp. 739–759.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009102127

Baqir, R. (1999), ‘Districts, spill-overs, and government overspending’, Macroeconomics and Growth Working Paper, 2192, Development Research Group, World Bank Publications.
Google Scholar

Bardes, B., Shelley, M., Schmidt, S. (2014), American Government and Politics Today: The Essentials 2013–2014 Edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Google Scholar

Boex, J. (2012), ‘Exploring the measurement and effectiveness of the local public sector: Toward a classification of local public sector finances and a comparison of devolved and deconcentrated finances’, IDG Working Paper, 5, Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance, http://www.urban.org/publications/412474.html (18.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Bournakis, I. and Tsoukis, C. (2016), ‘Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies’, Economic Modelling, 53, pp. 37–47.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.011

Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V. and Teorell, J. (2010), ‘Dimensions of bureaucracy. A cross-national dataset on the structure and behavior of public administration’, QoG Working Paper Series, 13, pp. 3–59.
Google Scholar

Di Liddo, G., Magazzino, C. and Porcelli, F. (2015), ‘Decentralization, growth and optimal government size in the Italian regional framework’, CREI Working Paper, 1, Centre for Research on the Economics of Institutions, Rome, Italy.
Google Scholar

Di Matteo, L. (2013), Measuring Government in the Twenty-first Century: An International Overview of the Size and Efficiency of Public Spending, Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Google Scholar

Dollery, B., Robotti, L. (2008), ‘Alternative model of local government’, [in:] Dollery, B., Robotti, L. (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Local Government Reform, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 27‒33.
Google Scholar

Dvouletý, O. (2017), ‘Determinants of Nordic entrepreneurship’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24 (1), pp. 12–33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2016-0104

Eurostat (2017), Statistical Database, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (25.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Evans, P. and Rauch, J. E. (1999), ‘Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth’, American Sociological Review, 64 (5), pp. 748–765.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657374

Forte, F. and Magazzino, C. (2011), ‘Optimal size government and economic growth in EU countries’, Economia Politica, 28 (3), pp. 295–322.
Google Scholar

Fukushige, M. and Shi, Y. (2016), ‘Efficient scale of prefectural government in China’, China Finance and Economic Review, 4 (2), pp. 1‒18.
Google Scholar

Garand, J. C., Ulrich, J., Xu, P. (2014), ‘Fiscal policy in the American States’, [in:] Haider-Markels, D. P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579679.013.025

Garrett, T. A., Rhine, R. M. (2006), ‘On the Size and Growth of Government’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88 (1), pp. 13‒30, https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/01/GarrettRhine.pdf (18.04.2017).
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.20955/r.88.13-30

Handoussa, H. and Reiffers, J. L. (2003), Femise report on the Euro-Mediterranean partnership: Analysis and Proposals of the Euro-Mediterranean Forum of Economic Institutes, Marseilles: Institut de la Méditerranée.
Google Scholar

Heller, P. S., Tait, A. A. (1983), Government Employment and Pay: Some International Comparisons, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Google Scholar

Hemming, R. (1991), ‘Public expenditure measurement’, [in:] Chu, K., Hemming, R. (eds.), Public Expenditure Handbook: A Guide to Public Policy Issues in Developing, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, pp. 32‒41.
Google Scholar

Higgins, M. J., Young, A. T., Levy, D. (2006), ‘Federal, State, and Local Governments: Evaluating their Separate Roles in US Growth’, MPRA Paper, 1014.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.949007

Ivanov, S., Tchavdarova, G., Savov, E., Stanev, H. (2002), ‘Does Larger Mean More Effective? Size and the Functioning of Local Governments in Bulgaria’, [in:] Swianiewicz, P. (ed.), Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Institute, pp. 167‒219.
Google Scholar

Kalseth, J., Rattso, J. (1995), ‘Spending and overspending in local government administration: A minimum requirement approach applied to Norway’, European Journal of Political Economy, 11 (2), pp. 239‒251.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(94)00063-P

Karras, G. (1996), ‘The optimal government size: further international evidence on the productivity of government services’, Economic Inquiry, 34 (2), pp. 193–203.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1996.tb01372.x

Kolařík, P., Šumpela, V. and Tomešová, J. (2014), ‘European Union’s Cohesion Policy – Diversity of the Multi-Level Governance Concept, the Case Study of Three European States’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 21 (2), pp. 193–211.
Google Scholar

Labonte, M. (2010), The Size and Role of Government: Economic Issues, June 14, Congressional Research Service 7-5700, RL32162, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/145595.pdf (21.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Mackenzie, G. A. (1991), ‘Public sector employment’, [in:] Chu, K., Hemming, R. (eds.), Public Expenditure Handbook: A Guide to Public Policy Issues in Developing, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Google Scholar

Magazzino, C. (2012), Politiche di bilancio e crescita economica, Torino: Giappichelli, pp. 137‒169.
Google Scholar

Moja Polis (2017), Moja Polis – Polska pod lupą, http://www.mojapolis.pl/ (25.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Obydenkova, A. V. and Salahodjaev, R. (2017), ‘Government size, intelligence and life satisfaction’, Intelligence, 61, pp. 85–91.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.01.008

Pevcin, P. (2012), ‘Local Government in Slovenia: Structure, Size, and Expenditures’, Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 12, pp. 705‒724.
Google Scholar

Phillips, K. L., Chen, B. (2007), ‘A panel data sensivity analysis of regional growth in China’, [in:] Lin, S., Zhu, X. (eds.), Private enterprises and China’s economic development, London: Routlege, pp. 126‒141.
Google Scholar

Polish Ministry of Finance (2017), www.mofnet.gov.pl (25.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Polish Statistical Office (2017), http://stat.gov.pl/ (25.04.2017).
Google Scholar

Sabra, M. M. (2016), ‘Government size, country size, openness and economic growth in selected MENA countries’, International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 9 (1), pp. 39–45.
Google Scholar

SalvinO, R. (2007), ‘Home Rule Effects on State and Local Government Size’, Working Paper, 701, Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Google Scholar

Scully, G. W. (2000), ‘The growth-maximizing tax rate’, Pacific Economic Review, 5 (1), pp. 93–96.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.00091

Scully, G. W. (2002), ‘Economic freedom, government policy and the trade-off between equity and economic growth’, Public Choice, 113 (1), pp. 77–96.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020308831424

Scully, G. W. (2003), ‘Optimal taxation, economic growth and income inequality’, Public Choice, 115 (3), pp. 299–312.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024223916710

Sellers, J. M., Barnes, J., Hoffmann-Martinot, V., Shipper, A. (2003), Between national state and local society: Infrastructures of local governance in developed democracies, Cleveland, OH: University of South California.
Google Scholar

Sineviciene, L. and Railiene, G. (2015), ‘The nexus between government size, tax burden and private investment’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 485–490.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.438

Sirait, S. (2017), ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Local Government Size: Evidence from Indonesia’, Public Policy and Administration Research, 7 (2), pp. 9‒14.
Google Scholar

Skica, T., Rodzinka, J. and Fryc, B. (2016), ‘Selection and Assortment of the Variables Describing the Relationship between the Economy and the General Government Sector Size by Application of the LEM2 Algorithm’, e-Finanse, 12 (3), pp. 69–84.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fiqf-2016-0003

SRIYANA, J. (2016). ‘Optimum size of government spending in Indonesia’, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 11 (3), pp. 441‒449.
Google Scholar

Statistical Yearbook of The Regions – Poland (2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Central Statistical Office of Poland, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M. and Stride, C. (2015), ‘Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (3), pp. 308–331.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.38

Tanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (2007), La spesa pubblica nel XX secolo. Una prospettiva globale, Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-8453-554-2

The Central Statistical Office of Poland (2017), http://stat.gov.pl/ (2.05.2017).
Google Scholar

The Heritage Foundation (2017), http://www.heritage.org/ (2.05.2017).
Google Scholar

Weiher, G. R. and Lorence, J. (1991), ‘Growth in State Government Employment: A Time Series Analysis’, Political Research Quarterly, 44 (2), pp. 373‒388.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299104400207

Yearbook of Labour Statistics (2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Central Statistical Office of Poland, Warsaw.
Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Zhu, C. and Hou, Y. (2016), ‘Fiscal Decentralization, Flat Administrative Structure, and Local Government Size: Evidence and Lessons from China’, Public Administration and Development, 36 (3), pp. 198–214.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1762