Foreword

Authors

  • Erica Nagy Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5600 Békéscsaba, Szabó Dezso Street 42, Hungary
  • Judit Timár Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5600 Békéscsaba, Szabó Dezso Street 42, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2017-0006

Abstract

The idea of this special issue was inspired by two powerful processes that encompassed academic studies focused on socio-spatial inequalities within Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and beyond.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BALOGH, P. (2015), ‘The Land of Storms and the region where the country’s heart beats: changing images of peripherality in Hungary’, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64 (3), pp. 219–232.
Google Scholar

BEREND, I. (2005), ‘What is Central and Eastern Europe?’, European Journal of Social Theory, 8 (4), pp. 401–416.
Google Scholar

BEREND, I. and RÁNKI, G. Y. (1980), Underdevelopment in Europe in the Context of East-West Relations in the 19th Century, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Google Scholar

BIBÓ, I. (1946), ‘The Distress of the East European Small States’, [in:] NAGY, K. (ed.), Democracy, Revolution and Self-determination: Selected Writings of István Bibó, Boulder, CO: Social Science Monographs.
Google Scholar

BOATCA, M. (2006), ‘Semiperipheries in the world-system: Reflecting Eastern European and Latin American experiences’, Journal of World-systems Research, 12 (2), pp. 321–346.
Google Scholar

BOCKMAN, J. and EYAL, G. (2002), ‘Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 108 (2), pp. 310–352.
Google Scholar

BOHLE, D. and GRESKOVITS, B. (2007), ‘The State, Internationalization, and Capitalist Diversity in Eastern Europe’, Competition and Change, 11 (2), pp. 89–115.
Google Scholar

BÖRÖCZ, J. (1999), ‘From comprador state to auctioneer state. Property change, realignment, and peripheralisation in post-state-socialist Central and Eastern Europe’, [in:] SMITH, D. A., SOLINGER, D. J. and TOPIK, S. C. (eds.), States and sovereignty in the global economy, London–New York: Routledge, pp. 193–209.
Google Scholar

BÖRÖCZ, J. (2010), The European Union and global social change, London‒New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

BRAUDEL, F. (1992), Civilization and capitalism, 15th–18th century: The structure of everyday life, Berkeley: Los Angeles University of California Press.
Google Scholar

BRENNER, R. (1989), ‘Economic backwardness in Eastern Europe in light of developments in the West’, [in:] CHIROT, D. (ed.), The origins of backwardness in Eastern Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 15–52.
Google Scholar

CHIROT, D. (1989), ‘Causes and consequences of backwardness’, [in:] CHIROT, D. (ed.), The origins of backwardness in Eastern Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–14.
Google Scholar

DOMANSKI, B. and LUNG, Y. (2009), ‘Editorial: The changing face of the European periphery in the automotive industry’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 16 (1), pp. 5–10.
Google Scholar

DÜZGÜN, E. (2013), ‘The poverty of peripheralisation: Re-conceptualizing the peripheral space’, [in:] FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds.), Peripheralisation. The making of spatial dependencies and injustice, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 29–54.
Google Scholar

FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (2013), ‘Introduction: Peripheralisation as the social production of spatial dependencies and injustice’, [in:] FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds.), Peripheralisation. The making of spatial dependencies and injustice, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 9–26.
Google Scholar

GERSCHENKRON,A. (1959), ‘Economic backwardness in historical perspective’, [in:] HOSELITZ, B. F. (ed.), The progress of underdeveloped areas, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–29.
Google Scholar

KOCHANOWITZ, J. (1989), ‘The Polish economy and the evolution of dependency’, [in:] CHIROT, D. (ed.), The origins of backwardness in Eastern Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 92–130.
Google Scholar

KONRÁD, G. and SZELÉNYI, I. (1978), Az értelmiség útja az osztályhatalomhoz, Budapest: Gondolat.
Google Scholar

KOOBAK, R. and MARLING, R. (2014), ‘The decolonial challenge. Framing post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe within transnational feminist studies’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21 (4), pp. 330–343.
Google Scholar

KÜHN, M. and BERNDT, M. (2013), ‘Peripheralisation and Power – Theoretical Debates’, [in:] FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds.), Peripheralisation. The Making of Spatial dependencies and Social Injustice, Wiesbaden: Springer VC, pp. 302–317.
Google Scholar

LAMPE, J. R. (1989), ‘Imperial borderlands or capitalist periphery? Redefining Balkan backwardness’, [in:] CHIROT, D. (ed.), The origins of in Eastern Europe, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 177–209.
Google Scholar

LANG, T. (2011), ‘Regional development issues in Central and Eastern Europe: shifting research agendas from a focus on peripheries to peripheralisation?’, [in:] ERŐSS, Á. and KARÁCSO NYI, D. (eds.), Geography in Visegrad and Neighbour Countries, Budapest, pp. 57–64.
Google Scholar

LANG, T. (2015), ‘Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda’, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64 (3), pp. 171–185.
Google Scholar

LEFEBVRE, H. (1991), The production of space, Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

MASSEY, D. (2008), For space, London–Thousand Oaks, CA–New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

MEYER, F. and MIGGELBRINK, J. (2013), ‘The subject and the periphery: About discourses, loopings and ascriptions’, [in:] FISCHER-TAHIR, A. and NAUMANN, M. (eds.), Peripheralisation. The making of spatial dependencies and injustice, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 207–223.
Google Scholar

PECK, J. and THEODORE, N. (2007), ‘Variegated capitalism’, Progress in Human Geography, 31 (6), pp. 731–772.
Google Scholar

PEET, R. and HARTWICK, E. (2015), Theories of development, New York‒London: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

PICKLES, J. and SMITH, A. (2015), ‘Narrating the Diverse Regional Economies of Post-Socialist Apparel’, [in:] LANG, T., HENN, S., SGIBNEV, W. and EHRLICH, K. (eds.), Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralisation, Basingstoke‒New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 40–61.
Google Scholar

PLÜSCHKE-ALTOF, B. (2017), ‘The Question of Responsibility: (De-)Peripheralizing Rural Spaces in Post-Socialist Estonia’, European Spatial Research and Policy, 24 (2) (in this issue).
Google Scholar

SCOTT, J. C. (1996), ‘Az ellenállás hétköznapi formái’, Replika, 23‒24, pp. 109‒130.
Google Scholar

SEBŐK, M (2016), ‘A moderizációs konszenzus mint a rendszerváltás ideológiája és közpolitikája’, [in:] FÖLDES, G. and ANTAL, A. (eds.), Holtpont. Társadalomkritikai tanulmányok Magyarorzág elmúlt 25 évéről, Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó, pp. 46–78.
Google Scholar

SMITH, A. and TIMÁR, J. (2010), ‘Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 17 (2), pp. 115–125.
Google Scholar

SMITH, N. (1984), Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

STENNING, A. and HÖRSCHELMANN, K. (2008), ‘History, geography and difference in the post-socialist world: or, do we still need post-socialism?’, Antipode, 40, pp. 312–335.
Google Scholar

SZALAI, E. (2006), Az újkapitalizmus és ami utána jöhet. Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó.
Google Scholar

SZŰCS, J. (1981), ‛Vázlat Európa három történeti régiójáról’, Történelmi Szemle, 3, pp. 313–359.
Google Scholar

TIMÁR, J. (2003), ‛Lessons from postsocialism: What’s left for emerging critical geography to do in Hungary?’, Antipode 35 (1), pp. 24–33.
Google Scholar

TIMÁR, J (2004), ‘More than ‘Anglo-American’, it is ‘Western’: hegemony in geography from a Hungarian perspective’, Geoforum, 35 (5), pp. 533–538.
Google Scholar

TIMÁR, J. (2007), ‘Gender studies in the gender-blind post-socialist geographies of East-Central Europe’, Belgeo, 3, pp. 349–369.
Google Scholar

TLOSTANOVA, M. (2012), ‘Postsocialist ≠ postcolonial? On Post-Soviet imaginary and Global Coloniality’, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 48 (2), pp. 130–142.
Google Scholar

WALLERSTEIN, I. (1974), The modern world system. Capitalist agriculture and the European world economy in the sixteenth century, New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

WALLERSTEIN, I. (2004), World system analysis. An introduction, Durham–London: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar

ZARYCKI, T. (2011), ‘Eastern Poland in a center-periphery perspective’, [in:] STEFANSKI, M. (ed.), Strategic issues of the development of the Lublin region, Lublin: Innovation Press, pp. 95–112.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-01-30

How to Cite

Nagy, E., & Timár, J. (2018). Foreword. European Spatial Research and Policy, 24(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2017-0006

Issue

Section

Articles