L’oeil-araignée. Descriptive systems like optical boxes in Diderot’s "Salons". A reading starting from Hamon’s theses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/2392-0718.08.03Keywords:
Philippe Hamon, Visual Studies, description/definition, pantonyme, Diderot’s "Salons"Abstract
The text aims to analyse how the descriptive systems work in the Salons of Diderot. Retrieving the dense network of operational definitions developed by Philippe Hamon in the well-known text Du descriptif, our study develops a series of analyses aimed at highlighting the distance of Diderot’s descriptive practice with respect to the theoretical statements of the rhetorical treatise before him or coeval, focusing above all on an absolutely original use of the pantonyme within the Salons.
References
ARASSE, D. (1973). L’image et son discours: deux descriptions de Diderot. Scolies : Cahiers de Recherches de l’ENS, 3-4, pp. 131-160.
Google Scholar
BACHELARD, G. (1943). L’air et les songes. Paris: José Corti.
Google Scholar
BARTHES, R. (2005). Leçon 1977, in Œuvres complètes V. Paris: Seuil.
Google Scholar
CARTWRIGHT, M. T. (1969). Diderot critique d’art et le problème de l’expression, Diderot Studies, 13, pp. 1-267.
Google Scholar
CHOUILLET, J. (1973). La formation des idées esthétiques de Diderot. Paris: Armand Colin.
Google Scholar
COHEN, H. (1991). Diderot et les limites de la littérature dans les Salons. Diderot Studies, 24, pp. 25-31.
Google Scholar
DE SAUSSURE, F. (1965). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Google Scholar
DIDEROT, D. (1995). Ruines et paysages. Salon de 1767. Paris: Hermann.
Google Scholar
DIDEROT, D. (2007). Essais sur la peinture. Salon de 1759, 1761, 1763. Paris: Hermann.
Google Scholar
DIDEROT, D. (2008). Salons. Paris: Gallimard.
Google Scholar
GENETTE, G. (1986). Figure III. Discorso del racconto. Torino: Einaudi.
Google Scholar
GRENAND, S. (2007). L’œil ravi. Violences du regard dans les premiers Salons de Diderot. Diderot Studies, 30, pp. 143-154.
Google Scholar
HAMON, P. (1981). Du descriptif. Paris: Hachette.
Google Scholar
IBRAHIM, A. (1995). Diderot et la question de la forme. Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar
LOJKINE, S. (2007). Le problème de la description dans les Salons de Diderot. Diderot Studies, 30, pp. 53-72.
Google Scholar
LYOTARD, J-F. (1985). La philosophie et la peinture à l’ère de leur expérimentation. In CAZENAVE, A & LYOTARD, J-F. (ed.), L’art des confins. Mélanges offerts à Maurice de Gandillac. Paris: PUF, pp. 465-477.
Google Scholar
ROGER, J. (1963). Diderot et Buffon en 1749. Diderot Studies, 4, pp. 221-236.
Google Scholar
SCHILLER, F. (1997). Sul Sublime, Milano: SE.
Google Scholar
SEGRE, C. (1999). Avviamento all’analisi del testo letterario. Torino: Einaudi.
Google Scholar
SERRES, M. (1974). La traduction. Hermès III. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar
SERRES, M. (1979). La distribution. Hermès IV. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar
SERRES, M. (1980). Le passage de Nord-Ouest. Hermès V. Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.