Investigation of hand index, digit finger ratio (2D:4D), and grip strength among court sports

Md. Hamidur Rahman; J.P. Sharma

doi:10.18778/1898-6773.87.3.03

Authors

Md. Hamidur Rahman Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India; Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-8822
J.P. Sharma Indira Gandhi Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2334-4394

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.87.3.03

Keywords:

hand anthropometry, hand index, digit ratio (2D:4D), grip strength, court sports

Abstract

Hand index, finger ratio, and grip strength are potential indicators of proficiency in court sports. The aim of this study is to explore hand dimensions, fingers length ratio, and grip strength in court sports players, a domain in which such characteristics can significantly influence performance. Measurements, such as hand length (HL), hand breadth (HB), hand index (HI), palm length (PL), hand span (HS), index finger length (2D), ring finger length (4D), 2D to 4D ratio (2D:4D), low digit ratio (LDR), and high digit ratio (HDR) were studied in the field of hand anthropometry, along with a handgrip strength (HGS) test. Data were obtained from 135 male court sports players, including basketball, handball, and volleyball, with 45 players from each discipline. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and an independent t-test were used to compare variables, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The ANOVA results indicated that there were no significant differences in hand variables, namely HL, HB, PL, HS, 2D, 4D, 2D:4D, LDR, HDR, and HGS, except for the HI variable. Post-hoc test results showed HI differences in basketball versus handball and volleyball. Compared to standard HI, their ranges show that all-court sports often fall into the Dolichocheri type, characterized by long fingers and a narrow, small palm. A low digit ratio may have some effect on HI in basketball and volleyball. However, it does not appear to have a significant effect on HGS across the study. In summary, the results of our study show that court athletes are similar in hand characteristics, 2D:4D, and grip strength for the nature of the game.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboul-Hagag KE, Mohamed SA, Hilal MA, Mohamed EA. 2011. Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in upper Egyptians. Egypt J Forensic Sci 1(2):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2011.03.001
View in Google Scholar

Apostolidis N, Emmanouil Z. 2015. The influence of the anthropometric characteristics and handgrip strength on the technical skills of young basketball players. J Phys Educ Sport 15(2):330–337. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2015.02050
View in Google Scholar

Bardo A, Kivell TL, Town K, Donati G, Ballieux H, Stamate C, Edginton T, Forrester GS. 2021. Get a grip: variation in human hand grip strength and implications for human evolution. Symmetry 13(7):1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071142
View in Google Scholar

Barut Ç, Demirel P, Kiran S. 2008. Evaluation of hand anthropometric measurements and grip strength in basketball, volleyball and handball players. Anat (Int J Exp Clin Anat) 2:55–59. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.08.055
View in Google Scholar

Blackwell JR, Kornatz KW, Heath EM. 1999. Effect of grip span on maximal grip force and fatigue of flexor digitorum superficialis. Appl Ergon 30(5):401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(98)00055-6
View in Google Scholar

Chanana A, Bandapalle D. 2022. Determining the hand index and hand shape in the population of delhi: a cross-sectional study. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 11(11):199–203.
View in Google Scholar

Chia T, Anyanwu GE. 2020. Anthropometric evaluation of hand dimensions and hand index in a young Nigerian population. Appl Med Res 7(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.5455/amr.20191119093914
View in Google Scholar

Dey S, Kapoor AK. 2017. Sex determination from hand dimensions for forensic identification. Int J Res Med Sci 3(6):1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150169
View in Google Scholar

Fallahi AA, Jadidian AA. 2011. The effect of hand dimensions, hand shape and some anthropometric characteristics on handgrip strength in male grip athletes and non-athletes. J Hum Kinet 29:151–159. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0049-2
View in Google Scholar

Faraji E, Sarvari F, Ebrahimi Atri A. 2014. Predicting grip strength based on anthropometric characteristics in female junior volleyball players. Iran J Health Phys Act 5(1):25–28.
View in Google Scholar

Forro SD, Munjal A, Lowe JB. 2023. Anatomy, shoulder and upper limb, arm structure and function. In StatPearls: StatPearls Publishing.
View in Google Scholar

Fusar-Poli L, Rodolico A, Sturiale S, Carotenuto B, Natale A, Arillotta D, Siafis S, Signorelli MS, Aguglia E. 2021. Secondto- fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of case-control studies. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 19(1):26–45. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2021.19.1.26
View in Google Scholar

Gaurav DV, Singh M, Singh DS, Singh DA, Sandeep. 2015. A study of hand dimensions and hand grip strength between adolescent basketball and volleyball players. Am Int J Res Humanit Arts Soc Sci 10(3):287–289.
View in Google Scholar

George D, Mallery P. 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 16th ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
View in Google Scholar

Hepping AM, Ploegmakers JJ, Geertzen JH, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. 2015. The influence of hand preference on grip strength in children and adolescents; a cross-sectional study of 2284 children and adolescents. PLoS One 10(11):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143476
View in Google Scholar

Islam MS, Kundu B. 2019. Digit ratio and soccer. Orthop Sports Med Open Access J 3(1):227–230. https://doi.org/10.32474/OSMOAJ.2019.03.000154
View in Google Scholar

Islam MS, Kundu B. 2020a. Low digit ratio (2D:4D) and masculine attributes: a critical analysis. Int J Res – Granthaalayah 8(7):384–390. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i7.2020.773
View in Google Scholar

Islam MS, Kundu B. 2020b. Soccer passing accuracy differentiates between high and low digit ratio (2D:4D) soccer players. Am J Sports Sci 8(3):49–55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20200803.11
View in Google Scholar

Islam MS. 2020. Digit ratio body composition and motor fitness components as determinants of soccer specific skill performance [Doctoral thesis, Visva-Bharti University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/324422
View in Google Scholar

Islam MS. 2021. Low 2D: 4D may reduce the use of doping in sports. Saudi J Sports Med 21(1):33–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjsm.sjsm_9_21
View in Google Scholar

Karakoç Ö, Taşkın C, Yüksek S, Özçöven M. 2015. Examining hand grip strength in different sports. Int J Sport Stud 5(10):1132–1136.
View in Google Scholar

Kim TB, Kim KH. 2016. Why is digit ratio correlated to sports performance? J Exerc Rehabil 12(6):515–519. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1632862.431
View in Google Scholar

Kobus M, Sitek A, Rosset I, Pruszkowska- Przybylska P, Żądzińska E. 2021. Association of prenatal sex steroid exposure estimated by the digit ratio (2D:4D) with birth weight, BMI and muscle strength in 6– to 13–year-old Polish children. PLoS One 16(10):e0258179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258179
View in Google Scholar

Kociuba M, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z, Kozieł S. 2019. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the change in handgrip strength on an aggressive stimulus: a study among Polish young adults. Early Hum Dev 128:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev. 2018.11.009
View in Google Scholar

Kociuba M, Kulik T, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z, Rokita A, Koziel S. 2022. Is digit ratio (2D:4D) associated with a religious profession? An exploratory study on male Polish seminary students. Anthropolo Rev 85(3):95–106. https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.85.3.07
View in Google Scholar

Koziel S, Kociuba M, Ignasiak Z, Chakraborty R. 2016. Is sports choice and participation related to 2D:4D? A study among adult male students in Wrocław, Poland. Coll Antropol 40(2):105–110.
View in Google Scholar

Koziel S, Kociuba MM, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. 2017. Physical fitness and digit ratio (2D:4D) in male students from Wrocław, Poland. Coll Antropol 41(1):31–37.
View in Google Scholar

Kozieł S, Konarski JM, Konarska A, Huechert J, Ignasiak Z, Chakraborty R. 2024. The change in handgrip strength, after physical exercise, is moderated by digit ratio (2D:4D): A study among the young adults in Poland. Am J Hum Biol e24078. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.24078
View in Google Scholar

Kurtoğlu A, Çiftçi R. 2023. Relationship between 2d:4d ratio, handgrip strength, and hamstring muscle length in different sports: a study of volleyball, football and basketball branches. Phys Educ Stud 27(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0103
View in Google Scholar

Lee SY. 2021. Handgrip strength: An irreplaceable indicator of muscle function. Ann Rehabil Med 45(3):167–169. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.21106
View in Google Scholar

Lu H, Shen D, Wang L, Niu S, Bai C, Ma Z, Huo Z. 2017. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength are correlated in women (but not in men) in Hui ethnicity. Early Hum Dev 109:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.04.005
View in Google Scholar

Mahmoud AG, Elhadidy EI, Hamza MS, Mohamed NE. 2020. Determining correlations between hand grip strength and anthropometric measurements in preschool children. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 15(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.01.002
View in Google Scholar

Malik A, Singh B. 2014. Digital finger ratio (2d:4d) and salivary testosterone level in elite sportsmen and non-sportsmen. Int J Behav Soc Mov Sci 3(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11572.24969
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Fink B. 2018. Digit ratio. In: Shackelford T, Weekes-Shackelford V, editors. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3829-1
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. 1998. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod 13(11):3000–3004. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT, Taylor RP. 2001. Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav 22(1):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00063-5
View in Google Scholar

Manning JT. 2002. Digit ratio : A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Martin R, Saller K. 1957. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, Dritte Auflage. Vol. II. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
View in Google Scholar

Mazur A, Booth A. 1998. Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav Brain Sci 21(3):353–397.
View in Google Scholar

Nag A, Nag PK, Desai H. 2003. Hand anthropometry of Indian women. Indian J Med Res 117:260–269.
View in Google Scholar

Nara K, Kumar P, Rathee R, Kumar S, Pal Ahlawat R, Sharma JP, Singh S. 2022. Grip strength performance as a determinant of body composition, muscular strength and cardiovascular endurance. J Phys Educ Sport 22(7):1618-1625. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.07203
View in Google Scholar

Nicolay CW, Walker AL. 2005. Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int J Ind Ergon 35(7):605–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.007
View in Google Scholar

Rahman MH, Sharma JP. 2023. An assessment of maximal isometric hand grip strength and upper body explosive strength and endurance in various ball sports. Phys Educ Theory Methodol 23(6):932–939. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.6.16
View in Google Scholar

Ramos S, García A, Ayala F, Álzate D, Aguirre- Loaiza H. 2022. Variation of digit ratio (2D:4D) in athletes and differences with sports groups. J Sport Health Res 14(3):453– 464. https://doi.org/10.58727/jshr.87631
View in Google Scholar

Ranson R, Stratton G, Taylor SR. 2015. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness (Eurofit test battery) in school children. Early Hum Dev 91(5):327-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.03.005
View in Google Scholar

Reza MN, Rahman MH, Islam MS, Gayen A. 2023. An examination of audio-visual simple reaction times in selected court games. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 17(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.22587/ajbas.2023.17.1.2
View in Google Scholar

Ruiz JR, España-Romero V, Ortega FB, Sjöström M, Castillo MJ, Gutierrez A. 2006. Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers. J Hand Surg 31(8):1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.06.014
View in Google Scholar

Sarkodie FK, Adjei BM, Tetteh J, Bimpong S, Nketsiah J, Adjei-Antwi C, Abaidoo CS. 2023. A preliminary anthropometric study on second digit: fourth digit (2D:4D) ratio and other hand dimensions for sex determination. Forensic Sci Int Rep 7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2023.100320
View in Google Scholar

Schlüssel MM, dos Anjos LA, de Vasconcellos MT, Kac G. 2008. Reference values of handgrip dynamometry of healthy adults: a population-based study. Clin Nutr 27(4):601–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.004
View in Google Scholar

Shen D, Ma Z, Wang L, Huo Z, Lu H, Zhao J, Qian W. 2016. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength in a Chinese population of Han ethnicity. Early Hum Dev 103:141–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.09.014
View in Google Scholar

Tomaszewska A, Lubońska JA. 2022. 2D: 4D digit ratio and its relationship to BMI, sporting choices and physiological predispositions among women. Anthropol Rev 85(2):135–146. https://doi.org/10.18778/1898-6773.85.2.07
View in Google Scholar

Tomkinson G, Dyer M. 2017. Finger size does matter… in sports. Educ Health Behav Stud Fac Publ 23. https://commons.und.edu/ehb-fac/23
View in Google Scholar

Visnapuu M, Jürimäe T. 2007. Handgrip strength and hand dimensions in young handball and basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 21(3):923–929. https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287(2007)21[923:HSAHDI]2.0.CO;2
View in Google Scholar

Wichelhaus A, Harms C, Neumann J, Ziegler S, Kundt G, Prommersberger KJ, Mühldorfer-Fodor M. 2018. Parameters influencing hand grip strength measured with the manugraphy system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(54):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1971-4
View in Google Scholar

Wiliński W, Struzik A, Rokita A, Krejci M, Wieczorek M. 2022. Hand grip strength vs. locomotor efficiency in sitting volleyball players. J Hum Kinetics 82:275–282. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0081
View in Google Scholar

Zapartidis I, Palamas A, Papa M, Tsakalou L, Kotsampouikidou Z. 2016. Relationship among anthropometric characteristics, handgrip strength and throwing velocity in adolescent handball players. J Phys Educ Sports Manag 3(1):127–139. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpesm.v3n1a9
View in Google Scholar

Zhao D, Li B, Yu K, Zheng L. 2012. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and handgrip strength in subjects of Han ethnicity: impact of sex and age. Am J Phys Anthropol 149(2):266–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22130
View in Google Scholar