A need for an update of Polish birth weight reference norms

Authors

  • Tomasz Hadada Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
  • Magdalena Kosińska Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0006

Keywords:

developmental norms, percentile charts, gestational age, birth weight

Abstract

The indicators of perinatal outcome are birth weight and gestational age. The standard method of assessing the outcome is comparing the newborn’s birth weight with the reference system, presented in the form of percentile charts. Acceleration or delay in prenatal development, which are associated with environmental changes, stress the need to validate the developmental norms. The goal of this study is to evaluate the need to construct new and accurate reference standards. The study includes data of newborns from singleton pregnancies: 4919 born in 2000 and 3683 born in 2015. Study variables included gestational age, sex, and birth weight. Percentile values estimated for two groups of infants born in years separated by a 15-year period, born in 2000 and in 2015, were compared. Birth weight percentiles, from the 28th to the 42nd week of gestation, were calculated using the Lambda Mu Sigma method. Estimated values revealed the birth weight standards in different weeks of gestational age for both years: 2000 and 2015. Comparison among medians estimated for infants born in these years showed the existence of significant differences among boys in the 28th, 36th, and 39th weeks and among girls in the 34th and 41st weeks of gestational age. As the period between the two measurements involves several years, environmental changes during this time period might have significantly affected the course of pregnancy and thus the birth weight. Hence, there is a need to validate the developmental norms. The reference standards should be renewed, and must be done on a periodical basis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arroyo V, Díaz J, Carmona R, Ortiz C, Lin-ares C. 2016. Impact of air pollution and temperature on adverse birth outcomes: Madrid, 2001–2009. Environ Pollut 218:1154–61.
View in Google Scholar

Badade A, Bhide A, Satoskar P, Wadekar D. 2013. Validation of the global reference for fetal weight and birth weight percentiles. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23:266.
View in Google Scholar

Beeckman K, van De Putte S, Putman K, Louckx F. 2009. Predictive social factors in relation to preterm birth in a metropolitan region. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:787–92.
View in Google Scholar

Bobak M, Pikhart H, Rose R, Hertzman C, Marmot M. 2000. Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Soc Sci Med 51:343–50.
View in Google Scholar

Chauhan SP, Rice MM, Grobman WA, Bailit J, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, et al. 2017. Neonatal Morbidity of Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates Born at Term in Uncomplicated Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 130:511–19.
View in Google Scholar

Cole TJ, Green PJ. 1992. Smoothing reference centile curves: The lms method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 11:1305–19.
View in Google Scholar

Davidson S, Sokolover N, Erlich A, Litwin A, Linder N, Sirota L. 2008. New and improved Israeli reference of birth weight, birth length, and head circumference by gestational age: a hospital-based study. Isr Med Assoc J 10:130–4.
View in Google Scholar

De Bie HMA, Oostrom KJ, Delemarre-Van De Waal HA. 2010. Brain development, intelligence and cognitive outcome in children born small for gestational age. Horm Res Paediatr 73:6–14.
View in Google Scholar

Evans N, Hutchinson J, Simpson JM, Donoghue D, Darlow B, Henderson-Smart D. 2007. Prenatal predictors of mortality in very preterm infants cared for in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:F34–40.
View in Google Scholar

Feldman PJ, Dunkel-Schetter C, Sandman CA, Wadhwa PD. 2000. Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosom Med 62:715–25.
View in Google Scholar

Gadzinowski J, Kaliszewska-Drozdowska, MD, Kosińska M, Mazela J, Stoińska B. 2003. Birth weight and gestational age of newborns from Wielkopolski and Lubuski regions. Ginekol Pol 74: 186–92.
View in Google Scholar

Giapros V, Drougia A, Krallis N, Theocharis P, Andronikou S. 2012. Morbidity and mortality patterns in small-for-gestational age infants born preterm. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:153–7.
View in Google Scholar

Hanke W, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Sobala W, Kalinka J. 2001. Employment status of pregnant women in central Poland and the risk of preterm delivery and small-for-gestational-age infants. Eur J Public Health 11:23–8.
View in Google Scholar

Kaliszewska-Drozdowska MD. 1992. Noworodek – stan rozwoju fizycznego i trendy rozwojowe urodzeniowej masy ciała. Przegląd Antropol 55:33–43.
View in Google Scholar

Kirby RS, Wingate MS. 2010. Late preterm birth and neonatal outcome: is 37 weeks’ gestation a threshold level or a road marker on the highway of perinatal risk? Birth 37:169–71.
View in Google Scholar

Kosińska M. 2011. Stan okołourodzeniowy potomstwa jako efekt interakcji układu płód–matka–środowisko. Poznań. Wydawnictwo UAM.
View in Google Scholar

Kosińska M, Hadada T, Liczbińska G. 2019. Does extreme maternal age still act as a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome? Evidence from Poland 20 years after the social and economic transformation. Anthropol Rev 82:125–37.
View in Google Scholar

Kosińska M, Sierzputowska-Pieczara M, Gadzinowski J, Cygan D, Szpecht D. 2018. Percentile charts of twin birthweight. Pediatr Int 60:948–53.
View in Google Scholar

Koupilova I, Rahu K, Rahu M, Karro H, Leon DA. 2000. Social determinants of birth-weight and length of gestation in Estonia during the transition to democracy. Int J Epidemiol 29:118–24.
View in Google Scholar

Norris, T., Seaton, S.E., Manktelow, B.N., Baker, P.N., Kurinczuk, J.J., Field, D., Draper, E.S., Smith, L.K., 2018. Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 103:F577–F582.
View in Google Scholar

Ouyang F, Zhang J, Betrán AP, Yang Z, Souza JP, Merialdi M. 2013. Recurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 91:357–67.
View in Google Scholar

Peck MG, Sappenfield WM, Skala J. 2010. Perinatal periods of risk: A community approach for using data to improve women and infants’ health. Matern. Child Health J 14:864–74.
View in Google Scholar

Różdżyńska-Świątkowska A, Kułaga Z, Grajda A, et al. 2015. Siatki centylowe dla oceny wzrastania i stanu odżywienia polskich dzieci i młodzieży od urodzenia do 18 roku życia. Stand Med 12:119–35.
View in Google Scholar

Salavecz G, Chandola T, Pikhart H, Dragano N, Siegrist J, Jöckel KH, et al 2010. Work Stress and Health in Western European and Post-Communist Countries: An East–West Comparison Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:57–62
View in Google Scholar

Sowada C, Sagan A, Kowaska-Bobko I. 2018. Health System Review. Heal Syst Transit 21:1–234
View in Google Scholar

Strand LB, Barnett AG, Tong S. 2011. The influence of season and ambient temperature on birth outcomes: a review of the epidemiological literature. Environ Res 111:451–62.
View in Google Scholar

Szwed A, Kosińska M. 2012. Biological maturity at birth, the course of the subsequent ontogenetic stages and age at menarche. HOMO – J Comp Hum Biol 63:292–300.
View in Google Scholar

Villar J, Ismail LC, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, et al. 2014. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: The Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTER-GROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 384:857–868.
View in Google Scholar

Villar J, Ismail LC, Staines U, Giuliani, Ohuma EO, Victora CG, et al. 2018. The satisfactory growth and development at 2 years of age of the INTERGROWTH-21 st Fetal Growth Standards cohort support its appropriateness for constructing international standards. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:S841-S854.e2.
View in Google Scholar

Zhao X, Xia Y, Zhang H, Baker PN, Norris T. 2019. Birth weight charts for a Chinese population: an observational study of routine newborn weight data from Chongqing. BMC Pediatr 19:426.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

How to Cite

Hadada, T., & Kosińska, M. (2020). A need for an update of Polish birth weight reference norms. Anthropological Review, 83(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0006

Issue

Section

Articles