Praktyczno-teoretyczny model grania cyfrowego

Autor

  • Milan Jaćević The Royal Danish Academy, Institute for Visual Design

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.06.01

Słowa kluczowe:

granie cyfrowe, teoria praktyki, Pierre Bourdieu, kompetencje ludyczne, groznawstwo, granie, umiejętności gracza

Abstrakt

Badania nad naturą grania są utrudnione przez różnorodność możliwych form, jakie może przybierać ta działalność. W artykule tym podejmuję ten problem, analizując gry (cyfrowe) pod szyldem teorii praktyki i próbuję rzucić więcej światła na praktyczne aspekty kompetencji ludycznych. Opierając się na założeniach teoretycznych i koncepcyjnych Pierre’a Bourdieu, przedstawiam ogólny model gier cyfrowych jako formy usytuowanej praktyki człowieka, a następnie prezentuję studium przypadku, zaprojektowane w celu przetestowania i skorygowania wstępnej wersji modelu. Choć poszerzenie zakresu stosowalności modelu wymaga badań na większej populacji graczy, wyniki naszego badania potwierdzają poprawność naszego modelu rozumianego jako teoria wyznaczania i osadzania praktyk wyrosłych z artefaktów ludycznych.

Biogram autora

Milan Jaćević - The Royal Danish Academy, Institute for Visual Design

Milan Jaćević – MSc, MA, is a PhD student at the Institute for Visual Design, The Royal Danish Academy. As part of his PhD project, he is creating digital game prototypes and conducting experimental studies to examine digital gaming from the standpoint of practice theory, centering said examination on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of the habitus.

Bibliografia

Apperley, Thomas H. (2006), Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres, “Simulation & Gaming”, no. 37(1), pp. 6–23.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282278

Arsenault, Dominic (2009), Video game genre, evolution and innovation, “Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture”, no. 3(2), pp. 149–176.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6003

Barr, Pippin (2008), Video game values: Play as human-computer interaction (Doctoral dissertation), Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1989), Social space and symbolic power, “Sociological theory”, no. 7(1), pp. 14–25.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/202060

Bourdieu, Pierre (1990), In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621558

Bourdieu, Pierre (1991), Language and symbolic power, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (2013), Outline of a theory of practice (Trans. R. Nice), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972).
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (2014), The logic of practice (Trans. R. Nice), Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1980).
Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Wacquant, Loïc (1992), An invitation to reflexive sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Bourgonjon, Jeroen (2014), The meaning and relevance of video game literacy, “CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture”, no. 16(5), pp. 1–8.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2510

Bryman, Alan (2012), Social Research Methods (4th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Buckingham, David (2008), What do young people need to know about digital media, [in:] Colin Lankshear, Michele Knobel (eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 73–88.
Google Scholar

Buckingham, David, Burn, Andrew (2007), Game literacy in theory and practice, “Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia”, no. 16(3), pp. 323–349.
Google Scholar

Consalvo, Mia (2007), Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1802.001.0001

Couldry, Nick (2012), Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), Building theories from case study research, “Academy of Management Review”, no. 14(4), pp. 532–550.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Flanagan, Mary (2003), SIMple and personal: Domestic space and The Sims, [in:] Proceedings of the Melbourne Digital Arts and Culture Conference, Melbourne, May 19–23, pp. 1–4.
Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent (2006), Five misunderstandings about case-study research, “Qualitative inquiry”, no. 12(2), pp. 219–245.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Gee, James P. (2003), What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595

Huang, Jeff, Yan, Eddie, Cheung, Gifford, Nagappan, Nachiappan, Zimmermann, Thomas (2017), Master maker: Understanding gaming skill through practice and habit from gameplay behavior, “Topics in Cognitive Science”, no. 9(2), pp. 437–466.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12251

Iacovides, Ioanna (2009), Exploring the link between player involvement and learning within digital games, [in:] Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: Celebrating people and technology, British Computer Society, pp. 29–34.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2009.4

Järvinen, Aki S. (2009), Games without Frontiers: Methods for Game Studies and Design (Doctoral dissertation), Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
Google Scholar

Jenkins, Richard (1992), Pierre Bourdieu, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Juul, Jesper (2005), Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Graeme (2015), The formation of gaming culture: UK gaming magazines, 1981–1995, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305107

Klevjer, Rune, Hovden, Jan F. (2017), The Structure of Videogame Preference, “Game Studies”, no. 17(2).
Google Scholar

Leino, Olli T. (2009), Understanding Games as Played: Sketch for a first-person perspective for computer game analysis, [in:] Proceedings of the Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, Oslo 2009, pp. 1–15.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Julianne, Rowlands, Julie, Gale, Trevor, Skourdoumbis, Andrew (eds.), (2016), Practice Theory and Education: Diffractive readings in professional practice, Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640532

Malaby, Thomas M. (2007), Beyond play: A new approach to games, “Games and culture”, no. 2(2), pp. 95–113.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007299434

Ortner, Sherry B. (1984), Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties, “Comparative studies in society and history”, no. 26(1), pp. 126–166.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500010811

Rouse, Joseph (2007), Practice theory, [in:] Stephen P. Turner, Mark W. Risjord (eds.), Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Elsevier, pp. 639–683.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451542-1/50020-9

Shaw, Adrienne (2013), Rethinking game studies: A case study approach to video game play and identification, “Critical Studies in Media Communication”, no. 30(5), pp. 347–361.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2012.701013

Squire, Kurt (2006), From content to context: Videogames as designed experience, “Educational Researcher”, no. 35(8), pp. 19–29.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019

Squire, Kurt (2008), Video-game literacy: A literacy of expertise, [in:] Donald J. Leu, Julie Coiro, Michele Knobel, Colin Lankshear, Handbook of research on new literacies, pp. 635–670.
Google Scholar

Strauss, Anselm, Corbin, Juliet (1998), Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Tengblad, Stefan (ed.) (2012), The work of managers: Towards a practice theory of management, Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639724.003.0018

Vahlo, Jukka (2017), An Enactive Account of the Autonomy of Videogame Gameplay, “Game Studies”, no. 17(1).
Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958), Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.), Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1953).
Google Scholar

Yin, Robert K. (2009), Case study research: Design and methods, Los Angeles CA: Sage.
Google Scholar

Zagal, José P. (2010), Ludoliteracy: Defining, understanding, and supporting games education, LaVergne TN: ETC Press.
Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Eric (2009), Gaming Literacy: Game Design as a Model for Literacy in the Twenty-First Century, [in:] Mark J.P. Wolf, Bernard Perron (eds.), The video game theory reader 2, London: Routledge, pp. 23–31.
Google Scholar

Bungie. (2003). Halo: Combat Evolved [Windows]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Game Studios.
Google Scholar

Firaxis Games. (2010). Civilization V [Windows]. Novato, CA: 2K Games.
Google Scholar

iD Software. (1993). Doom [MS-DOS]. New York City, NY: GT Interactive Software Corp.
Google Scholar

iD Software. (1996). Quake [MS-DOS]. New York City, NY: GT Interactive Software Corp.
Google Scholar

Maxis. (2000-present). The Sims [Windows]. Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.
Google Scholar

Metanet Software. (2016). N++ [Windows]. Toronto, Ontario: Metanet Software.
Google Scholar

Pajitnov, A., Pavlovsky, D., Gerasimov, V. (1986). Tetris. Moscow, Russia: AcademySoft.
Google Scholar

Squaresoft. (1998). Final Fantasy Tactics [PlayStation]. San Mateo, CA: Sony Computer Entertainment.
Google Scholar

Team Meat. (2010). Super Meat Boy [Windows]. Team Meat.
Google Scholar

Terry Cavanagh. (2014). VVVVVV [iOS]. Santa Ana, CA: Nicalis, Inc.
Google Scholar

Ubisoft Montpellier. (2013). Rayman Legends [Windows]. Montreuil, France: Ubisoft.
Google Scholar

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2019-12-30

Jak cytować

Jaćević, M. (2019). Praktyczno-teoretyczny model grania cyfrowego. Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies, 6(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.06.01

Numer

Tom 6 Nr 1 (2019)

Dział

Articles

Licencja

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC