Language Experience and Phonetic Training as Factors Influencing Timing Organisation in Polish Learners of English

Anna Gralińska-Brawata

doi:10.2478/rela-2014-0018

Authors

Anna Gralińska-Brawata University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0018

Keywords:

non-native speech rhythm, rhythm measures

Abstract

The paper investigates the dynamics of speech rhythm in Polish learners of English and, specifically, how rhythm measurements revealing durational characteristics of vocalic and consonantal intervals through the measures (%V, ΔV, ΔC, VarcoV, VarcoC and nPVI) change along the process of second language acquisition as a result of language experience and phonetic training, and influence rhythmic characteristics of L2 English. The data used for the analysis come from 30 Polish first-year students of the University of Łódź recorded reading two texts (English and Polish) during two recording sessions separated by a 7-month period of language studies and compared to the data obtained from the recordings of native speakers of English. The experiment aims at verifying whether the participants achieve progress in the rhythm measure scores under the influence of language experience and phonetic training, as it has already been confirmed that general proficiency of non-native speakers of English is a key factor contributing to the successful production of rhythmic patterns in English (Waniek-Klimczak 2009, Roach 2002). The results have shown no substantial and consistent progress for the whole group and across all the measures. Statistical tests, however, have revealed significant changes in the subjects' performance with respect to the vocalic measures ΔV and VarcoV. This may reflect the effect of the type of phonetic training the students are offered, which is segment-based with particular emphasis on vowels.

References

Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Adams, C. 1979. English Speech Rhythm and the Foreign Learner. The Hague: Mouton.
Google Scholar

Asu, E.L., Nolan, F. 2005. Estonian rhythm and the Pairwise Variability Index. In: Proceedings, FONETIK 2005, Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
Google Scholar

Avery, P. and Ehrlich, S. 1992. Teaching American English Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Barry, W.J., Andreeva, B, Russo, M., Dimitrova, S. and Kostadinova, T. 2003. Do Rhythm Measures Tell us Anything about Language Type? In: D. Recasens, M.J.Solé and J. Romero, editors, Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2003), Barcelona: 2693-2696.
Google Scholar

Boersma, P. And Weenink, D. 2008. Praat:Doing phonetics by computer (verion5.0.29). Retrieved 14th July 2008, from http://www.praat.org/
Google Scholar

Dauer, R. 1987. Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Tallin, Vol.5: 447-450.
Google Scholar

Dauer, R. M. 1983. Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalysed. Journal of Phonetics 11: 51-69.
Google Scholar

Dellwo, V., F. Gutierrez Diez, and N. Gavalda. 2009. The development of measurable speech rhythm in. Spanish speakers of English In Actas de XI Simposio Internacional de Comunicacion Social, Santiago de Cuba: 594-597.
Google Scholar

Dellwo, V. 2010. Influences of speech rate on the acoustic correlates of speech rhythm: An experimental phonetic study based on acoustic and perceptual evidence. PhD-Dissertation, Universität Bonn, electronic publication: http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de:90/2010/2003/2003.htm
Google Scholar

Dellwo, V., Wagner, P. 2000. Relations between language rhythm and speech rate. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Science. Barcelona: 471-474.
Google Scholar

Ferragne, E. and Pellegrino, F. 2008. Le rythme dans les dialectes de l’anglais: une affaire d’intensité ? Actes de Journées d’Etude de la Parole, Avignon, 9-13 juin 2008.
Google Scholar

Grabe, E. and Low, E.L. 2002. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In: C. Gussenhoven and N. Warner (eds) Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar

Gut, U. 2012. Rhythm in L2 Speech. In Gibbon, Dafydd (ed.), Speech and Language Technology. Poznań: 83-94.
Google Scholar

Hayes, B. and S. Puppel. 1985. On the rhythm rule in Polish. In: van der Hulst, H. and N. Smith. (eds) Advances in non-linear phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications: 59-81.
Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Jian, Hua-Li. 2004. On the syllable timing in Taiwan English, In B. Bel /. I. Marlien (eds) Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2004, Nara (Japan) 23-26 March 2004, ISCA Special Interest Group on Speech Prosody (SproSIG), 247-250.
Google Scholar

Laver, J. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Low, E. L., Grabe E. and Nolan F. 2000. Quantitative characterization of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech 43: 377-401.
Google Scholar

Mok, P., Dellwo, V. 2008. Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. Speech Prosody 2008, Campinas, 423-426.
Google Scholar

Nespor, M. 1990. On the rhythm parameter in phonology, Roca Iggy M., (ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition, Dordrecht: Foris: 157-175.
Google Scholar

Ordin, M., Polyanskaya, L., Ulbrich, Ch. 2011. Acquisition of Timing Patterns in Second Language. INTERSPEECH 2011, 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Florence, Italy, August 27-31, 2011, Florence, Italy; 08/2011.
Google Scholar

Pike, K.L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar

Ramus, F., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 72, 1-28.
Google Scholar

Roach, P. 2002. Studying rhythm and timing in English speech: Scientific curiosity, or a classroom necessity? In: E. Waniek-Klimczak and P. J. Melia (eds) Accents and Speech in Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology. Łódź Studies in Language Vol.5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang: 199-206.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. and Booij, G.E. 1985. A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66, North Holland: 281-319.
Google Scholar

Shport, I. 2009. The effect of oral proficiency on production of rhythm in spontaneous second language (L2) Japanese speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America vol. 125: 2728-2728.
Google Scholar

Stockmal, V., D. Marcus, and D. Bond. 2005. Measures of Native and Non-Native Rhythm in a Quantity Language. Language and Speech 48: 55-63.
Google Scholar

Wagner, P.S. 2012. Speech rhythm in native and non-native Polish. Proceedings of the International Conference of Experimental Linguistics ExLing 2012: 27-29 August 2012, Athens, Greece.
Google Scholar

Wagner, P.S., Dellwo, V. 2004. Introducing YARD (Yet Another Rhythm Determination) And Re-Introducing Isochrony to Rhythm Research. Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan.
Google Scholar

Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2009. Sources of difficulty in the acquisition of English rhythm by Polish learners: A developmental perspective. In M. Wysocka (ed.) On Language Structure, Acquisition and Teaching: 359-169. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar

Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2005. Temporal Parameters in Second Language Speech: An Applied Linguistic Phonetics Approach, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

White, L. and Mattys, S. 2007. Rhythmic typology and variation in first and second languages. In P. Prietro, J. Mascaró, and M. J. Solé (eds) Segmental and prosodic issues in romance phonology (Current issues in linguistic theory series). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar