Pre-fortis shortening in Czech English: A production and reaction-time study

Radek Skarnitzl; Pavel Šturm

doi:10.1515/rela-2016-0005

Authors

Radek Skarnitzl Charles University in Prague
Pavel Šturm

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0005

Keywords:

pre-fortis shortening, vowel duration, voicing, Czech English, reaction times

Abstract

This study focuses on the production and perception of English words with a fortis vs. lenis obstruent in the syllable coda. The contrast is mostly cued by the duration of the preceding vowel, which is shorter before fortis than before lenis sounds in native speech. In the first experiment we analyzed the production of 10 Czech speakers of English and compared them to two native controls. The results showed that the Czech speakers did not sufficiently exploit duration to cue the identity of the word-final obstruent. In the second experiment we manipulated C and V durations in target words to transplant the native ratios onto the Czech-accented speech, enhancing the fortis–lenis contrast, and vice versa. 108 listeners took part in a word-monitoring task in which reaction times were measured. The hypothesized advantage to items in which the target word (with a fortis or lenis obstruent) was semantically congruent with the following context was not confirmed, and subsequent analyses showed that the words’ frequency of use and the collocations they enter into strongly affect speech processing and correlate to a large degree with the reaction times.

References

Benko, V. 2014. Aranea: Yet Another Family of (Comparable) Web Corpora. In P. Sojka, A. Horák, I. Kopeček and K. Pala (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue. 17th International Conference, TSD 2014, LNCS 8655, 257–264.
Google Scholar

Blevins, J. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32, 117–166.
Google Scholar

Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2015. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.4.20. [Computer programme]. Available from: http://www.praat.org
Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar

Chen, M. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22, 129–159.
Google Scholar

Černikovská, Š. and P. Čermák. in print. Rysy cizineckého přízvuku ve španělštině českých mluvčích. Časopis pro moderní filologii.
Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Munro. 2011. Intelligibility, comprehensibility and accent: Their relevance to pronunciation teaching. Speak Out! IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Newsletter X: 1–5.
Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Rossiter. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13, 1–17.
Google Scholar

Fejlová, D. 2013. Pre-fortis shortening in fluent read speech: A comparison of Czech and native speakers of English. AUC Philologica 1/2014, Phonetica Pragensia XIII, 101–112.
Google Scholar

Forster, K. I. and J. C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35/1, 116–124.
Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. and T. Azuma. 2003. Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31, 305–320.
Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. and U. H. Frauenfelder. 1996. A Guide to Spoken Word Recognition Paradigms: Introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 11/6, 553–558.
Google Scholar

Grossberg, S. 2003. Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31, 423–445.
Google Scholar

Hahn, L. D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38, 201–223.
Google Scholar

Jessen, M. 1998. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Kilborn, K. and H. Moss. 1996. Word Monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes 11/6, 689–694.
Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. 1984. Phonetic explanation in phonology: the feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 41, 150–174.
Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. 2011. A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 48–72. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Machač, P. and R. Skarnitzl. 2009. Principles of Phonetic Segmentation. Praha: Epocha.
Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1990. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, 148–172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U. H. and J. Segui. 1981. The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 298–305.
Google Scholar

Moulines, R. and F. Charpentier. 1990. Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication 9, 453–467.
Google Scholar

Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45, 73–97.
Google Scholar

Repp, B. H. 1982. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92, 81–110.
Google Scholar

Sendlmeier, W. F. 1995. Feature, phoneme, syllable or word: How is speech mentally represented? Phonetica 52, 131–143.
Google Scholar

Skarnitzl, R. and P. Šturm. 2014. Assimilation of voicing in Czech speakers of English: The effect of the degree of accentedness. Research in Language 12(2), 199–208.
Google Scholar

Skarnitzl, R., Volín, J. and L. Drenková. 2005. Tangibility of Foreign Accents in Speech: the Case of Czech English. In: A. Grmelová, L. Dušková and M. Farrell (eds.), 2nd Prague Conference on Linguistics and Literary Studies Proceedings,11–20. Praha: PedF UK.
Google Scholar

Smith, B. L., Hayes-Harb, R., Bruss, M. and A. Harker. 2009. Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics 37, 257–275.
Google Scholar

Šturm, P. and J. Volín. 2012. Syllables versus phones in a word-monitoring experiment. Studies in Applied Linguistics 3(1-2), 25–34.
Google Scholar

Wedel, A. 2011. Self-organization in phonology. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewan, E. Hume and K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 130–147. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar

Zampini, M. L. 2008. L2 speech production research: Findings, issues, and advances. In J. G. H. Edwards and M. L. Zampini (eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition, 219–249. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Google Scholar