Analepsis: “Retrospection” or an “Excursion into the Past”?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-9681.13.16Keywords:
analepsis, retrospection, excursion into the past, remembrance device, analepsis motivation devices, dominant analepsis, non-dominant analepsisAbstract
Possible motivations for analepsis as a plot-shaping device are analyzed in the paper. In the Russian scholarship this device is interpreted either as retrospection introduced by remembrances, or as an excursion into the past conditioned by auctorial activity. An analysis of Yuri Polyakov’s novella Apofegei, supported by references to other Russian works, demonstrates that to motivate analepsis not only remembrance but also many other devices are used, such as introducing a new referent, anadiplosis of informative contexts, or an announced message. That is why the author of the paper proposes to use along with the terms retrospection and excursion into the past also the terms dominant analepsis and non-dominant analepsis. It is underlined that both the retrospection built on basis of a character’s remembrances and excursions into the past produced by the narrator’s constructing activity can be used within the frames of dominant and non-dominant analepses.
Downloads
References
Bernadskaya, Nina I. Ideino-khudozhestvennaya funktsiya vremennykh smeshchenii v kompozitsii sovremennogo romana. Avtoreferat dissertatsiyi na soiskanie uchenoi stepieni kandidata filologicheskich nauk. Kiev, 1986.
Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Mikhail A. Master i Margarita. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. Vol. 9. Moskva: Golos, 1999: 156–522.
Google Scholar
Bunin, Ivan A. Legkoe dykhanie. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. Vol. 4. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1988: 94–98.
Google Scholar
Galperin, Igor R. Tekst kak obyekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya, 5-e izd. Moskva: KomKniga, 2007.
Google Scholar
Gorbunova, Galina A. Dialogichnost i retrospektsiya kak sposoby kompozitsionnogo postroeniya romana Ya. L. Vishnevskogo ≪Odinochestvo v seti≫. In: Molodaya nauka: sbornik nauchnykh trudov nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii dlya studentov i molodykh uchenykh, ed. N. G. Goncharova. Simferopol: IT «ARIAL», 2016: 332–333.
Google Scholar
Grin, Aleksandr S. Alye parusa. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. Vol. 3. Moskva: Pravda, 1980: 3–69.
Google Scholar
Leites, Natalya S. O nekotorykh novykh osobennostyakh funktsii vremeni v kompozitsii romana (na materile nemetskoi literatury). In: Sbornik materialov k nauchnoi sessii vuzov Uralskogo ekonomicheskogo raiona (fevral 1963). Filologicheskie nauki. Literaturovedenie, ed. B. A. Bazilevskii. Sverdlovsk, 1963: 60–65.
Google Scholar
Markovich, Vladimir M. ≪Arkhaicheskie≫ konstruktsii v ≪Palate № 6≫: http://lit.phil.spbu.ru/article.php?id=22
Google Scholar
Maslov, Yurii S. Struktura povestvovatelnogo teksta i tipologiya preterialnykh sistem slavyanskogo glagola. In: Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologiya. Obshchee yazykoznanie. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, 2004: 216–249.
Google Scholar
Merkulova, Maiya G. Retrospektsiya: shekspirovskaya model retrospektsii v ≪Hamlete≫. http://www.worldshake.ru/ru/Encyclopaedia/3770.html
Google Scholar
Polyakov, Yurii M. Apofegei. Moskva: Izdatelstvo AST, 2015.
Google Scholar
Rogova, Galina I. Retrospektsiya kak forma kompozitsionnykh poiskov v sovremennoi sovetskoi proze. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepieni kandidata filologicheskich nauk. Moskva, 1983.
Google Scholar
Rzhevskaya, Nelli F. “Kontseptsiya khudozhestvennogo vremeni v sovremennom romane (funktsiya «retrospektsii» v romane)”. Filologicheskie nauki. No. 4 (1970): 28–40.
Google Scholar
Sukhikh, Igor N. Teoriya literatury. Prakticheskaya poetika: uchebnik. Sankt-Peterburg: Filologicheskii fakultet SPbGU, 2014.
Google Scholar
Tendryakov, Vladimir F. Tugoi uzel. In: Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. Vol. 1. Moskva: Goslitizdat, 1963: 145–376.
Google Scholar
Tolstoi, Aleksei N. Gadyuka. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 8 t. Vol. 4. Moskva: Pravda, 1972: 65–104.
Google Scholar
Tolstoi, Lev N. Smert Ivana Ilicha. In: Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90 t. Vol. 26. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1936: 61–113.
Google Scholar
Tyupa, Valerii I. Analiz khudozhestvennogo teksta: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov filologicheskikh fakultetov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii, 3-e izd. Moskva: Izdatelskii tsentr «Akademiya», 2009.
Google Scholar
Yefimenko, Aleksandr E. Analepticheskoe informativnoe soobshchenie kak faktor tekstoporozhdeniya. In: Russkaya slovesnost v nauchnom, kulturnom i obrazovatelnom prostranstve (k 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora V. I. Maksimova): materialy dokladov i soobshchenii XXI mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii, ed. N. T. Svidinskaya. Sankt-Peterburg: FGBOUVO «SPbGUPTD», 2016: 228–233.
Google Scholar
Yefimenko, Aleksandr E. Logika samorazvitiya sobytiya i konstruktivnaya aktivnost narratora. In: Aktualnye voprosy filologii i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov: stati i materialy Vosmoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Aktualnye voprosy filologii i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov». 24–25 fevralya 2016 g., ed. T. L. Masych. Sankt-Peterburg: RGGMU, 2016: 74–80.
Google Scholar
Yefimenko, Aleksandr E. ≪Smert Ivana Ilicha≫ L. N. Tolstogo: motivirovki porozhdeniya diegezisa. In: Interpretatsiya teksta: lingvisticheskii, literaturovedcheskii i metodicheskii aspekty: materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, ed. L. V. Butylskaya. Chita: ZabGU, 2018: 36–39.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
