The Death and the (Eternal) Return of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra

Authors

  • Michał Kruszelnicki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.43.01

Keywords:

Nietzsche, Zarathustra, death, the eternal return of the same, interpretation, difference, selection

Abstract

The paper argues that F. Nietzsche’s magnum opus Thus Spoke Zarathustra can be looked upon as a narrative about the protagonist’s maturation to understand, articulate and accept the thought of the eternal return which is tantamount to accepting the prospect of his own imminent death and the enigma of afterlife. I seek to prove that Zarathustra purposely defers systematic and coherent explanation of his deepest thought, as well as he dismisses its interpretations proposed by his animals, disciples, and by his main enemy – the dwarf. The thought of the eternal return can only be revealed, enacted. For this purpose, Zarathustra must actually die and return and by so doing bestow on the next generations the gift of his secret intuition. It can be argued convincingly that the last two chapters of part IV of Thus Spoke Zarathustra are conceived as a powerful performative reenactment of the thought of the eternal return as a selective force. The force, however, which does not bring a different (resp. “better”, “stronger”…) existence, as Gilles Deleuze would want it, but the very same, identical life.

References

Deleuze G. (1994). Difference and Repetition, trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Deleuze N. (1993). Nietzsche i filozofia, przeł. B. Banasiak, Warszawa: Spacja.
View in Google Scholar

Gooding-Williams R. (2001). Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804780193

Jung C.G. (2010). Zaratustra Nietzschego. Notatki z seminarium 1934- 1939, t. I-II, wydał J. L. Jarrett, przeł. R. Reszke, Warszawa: KR.
View in Google Scholar

Loeb P. S. (2010). The Death of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770821

Löwith K. (1979). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same, trans. J. H. Lomax, Berkeley: University of California Press.
View in Google Scholar

Nietzsche F., (1986), Sämtliche Briefe. Kritische Studienausgabe in 8 Bänden, hg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari (KSB), Berlin-New York, Band 6.
View in Google Scholar

Nietzsche F. (1967), Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, hg. von G. Colli und M. Montinari (KSA), Berlin-New York: Verlag Walter de Gruyter, Band 4, 11.
View in Google Scholar

Nietzsche F. (1999), To rzekł Zaratustra, przeł. S. Lisiecka i Z. Jaskuła, Warszawa: PIW.
View in Google Scholar

Nietzsche F. (1905), Tako rzecze Zaratustra, przeł. W. Berent, Warszawa: Wyd. Jakuba Mortkowicza.
View in Google Scholar

Pieniążek P. (1988). Problem wiecznego powrotu w filozofii Fryderyka Nietzschego, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica”, nr 5, ss. 179-201.
View in Google Scholar

Published

2018-12-30

How to Cite

Kruszelnicki, M. (2018). The Death and the (Eternal) Return of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Hybris, 43(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.43.01

Issue

Section

Articles